Can India Inc. continue its current way of doing business?

Oct 22, 2011

In this issue:
» Youth unemployment in the West on the rise
» Balancing growth & inflation a tougher task for US Fed
» What will be the RBI's next step?
» Traditional banking business has declined
» ...and more!
----------------------------- Don't Miss! Best of The Daily Reckoning... -----------------------------

We are proud to present an exclusive publication - The Guide to Gold, a compilation of Bill's most popular articles on Gold.

Join Bill as he discusses the past, present and most importantly, the future of Gold as an investment opportunity. And find out if Gold is still the best bet for you...

Quick! Sign Up Right Away & Get this guide FREE!


India Inc. has come a long way. And it is the private sector that has put the country on the global map given that companies in this space have been more dynamic, optimistic and nimble footed than their peers in the public sector space. And if India is to become the world's third largest economy in the future then all hopes will be pinned on the private sector to help the country achieve its goal. Especially if the government continues to be myopic in terms of introducing reforms that will take India's growth to the next level.

What makes Indian companies unique is that many of them are family run businesses who are ready to take the responsibility and spend large amounts of money on long term projects in India. This has helped many of them to become conglomerates. This business model is viewed favourably by quite a few companies since it gives the management more headroom to raise capital without having to cede control. What is more, the inadequacies of the government have also in a sense helped family run businesses to thrive. Legal issues are a grey area, infrastructure is often poor, supply chains not well developed, red tape a hazard, and markets for people, materials and finished goods unreliable. As a result, as the Economist points out, companies have take upon themselves the responsibility of doing things on their own and have worked out a system by which they can capitalise on the shortcomings of the government. Unfortunately, in many cases, it has also led to wide scale corruption.

But can this style of doing business continue for long? Indeed, today's way of doing things reflects a rational response to the way the government operates, and has helped India's economy motor along despite them. But at some point, the returns may not be that beneficial. Because at the end of the day, for India to be even considered as a country to be reckoned with, it will have to tackle the chronic issues of poor infrastructure, corruption, land allocation, education among others. It then follows that if the government is able to suitably address these concerns, the current way of doing business in India will no longer hold good. Given how slow and ineffective the government has been, this may not be such a big problem now, but is certainly a scenario that cannot be ruled out.

That said, Indian businesses do have the ability to adapt and the above scenario playing out may not turn out to be a very big challenge. But they will have a bigger responsibility towards the Indian people who have much higher expectations from them than they have from the government. And those companies which will have the ability to lead and not merely follow and at the same time have impeccable corporate governance practices to match will certainly stand the test of time.

Will India Inc. be able to continue doing business the way it has in the years ahead? Share with us or post your comments on our Facebook page.

 Chart of the day
It is a well documented fact that prolonged recession in the developed world has resulted in a surge in overall unemployment. And what these countries will have to worry about more is the unemployment prevalent among the youth. As today's chart of the day shows, youth unemployment has risen in the developed world with Spain leading the pack at 46%. Indeed, over time unemployment among the young population can be a dangerous thing as it means years lost due to no jobs, unattractive salaries and the diminishing prospect of getting a better job in the future. What is more, it creates great unrest and the prospect of revolution of the kind we have been witnessing in certain countries.

Data Source: The Economist

We may be blaming the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for being incompetent in taming inflation. But balancing growth and inflation could be tougher task to handle for the US Fed as compared to any other central bank. According to Fed Governor Charles Plosser the US Fed needs to step up on its monetary tightening act. Else the will be too much liquidity chasing too few goods. Plosser believes that the US economy could grow between 2.5% to 3% in 2012, if no major obstacles crop up. However, in the current excess liquidity scenario, even a nominal growth rate could spurt price rises in the economy. More importantly he offered a very critical advice to the US central bank. That of safeguarding its own reputation. By stoking inflation under the pretext of supporting economic growth with loose monetary policies the Fed may not be doing any favour to itself. We wonder why Mr Bernanke has chosen to turn deaf ears to some smart advice at his disposal!

The RBI has thrown everything in its arsenal at stubborn inflation. But prices refuse to budge. The latest food inflation number, based on the wholesale price index, came in 10.6% higher from a year earlier. All eyes are now on the central bank, who meets early next week to decide its latest monetary policy stance. Is 13 the lucky number for the RBI, or will it stop after a dozen rate hikes? 12 rate hikes and a 5% increase in policy rates have done nothing to dampen inflationary pressure. Since it hasn't succeeded at cooling inflation, maybe easing its aggressive stance to not damage growth further may be a better option. But, since its prime responsibility is to tame inflation, India may not be out of the woods just yet.

The commercial office space business, which has been the only bright spot in a grim real estate market has also hit turbulence. Rising interest rates and inadequate financing are blamed for the slowdown. Moreover delays in clearances have also added to the builders woos. According to a leading consultant firm, leasing activity has fallen around 33% in the commercial segment in the last quarter. This is the first decline in over a year. The report has also said that sale of office space, has fallen by 35% month-on-month and 25% year on year, indicating a slowdown. However developers point out that while companies might not be taking space for expansion at the moment, consolidation of space is still happening. Corporates are feeling the need to have all operations under one roof, which will bring economies of scale, as there is pressure to cut costs. They have reduced space per employee by decreasing common area sizes. These measures are helping companies optimise their real estate usage and reduce costs by at least 25%.

There was a time, not too long ago, when the best business to be in was the business of banking. However, this does not seem to be the case anymore. Go anywhere in the world and every banker has a sob story. The global financial crisis has hurt them all in some way or the other. Business from the traditional banking business has declined as people no longer wish to avail loans due to their own financial troubles. To top this the increased regulations have made it difficult for banks to earn through the innovative financial products as they used to in happier times. Increased regulation has actually hurt banks in more than one way. In addition to killing the lucrative business from financial innovation, it has also led to higher costs of compliance. This in turn has increased their cost income ratios thereby hurting their margins. One may think that the situation is better in the developing world. Well to some extent it is. Banks in countries like India are not bleeding. But higher interest rates have hurt their business as well. Nevertheless they are still in a much better position vis-a-vis their western counterparts. And we all know who to thank for that - the RBI.

It was a mixed week for the global stock markets. While the US and the UK were up by 1.4% and 0.4% each, most of the Asian and European markets closed the week in the red. The US markets in particular saw their highest levels since early August in anticipation of the upcoming European Union summit. The US markets also got a boost from strong earnings declared by blue-chip companies. As per Thomson Reuters, most of the S&P 500 companies that have declared results so far have exceeded analyst expectations.

Indian stock markets however fell by almost 1.7%. The markets were plagued with a number of fears including the worsening of European debt crisis resulting in the outflow of FII (Foreign Institutional Investor) money. There were concerns about inflation remaining at intolerably high levels and the RBI hiking interest rates yet again. Amongst the other world markets, Brazil and Germany were up by 0.4% and 0.1% respectively. Asian stock markets were down led by China (down by 4.4%).

Data Source: Yahoo Finance

 Weekend investing mantra
"What you really want to do in investments is figure out what's important and knowable. If it's unimportant or unknowable you forget about it." - Warren Buffett

Today's Premium Edition.

Recent Articles

All Good Things Come to an End... April 8, 2020
Why your favourite e-letter won't reach you every week day.
A Safe Stock to Lockdown Now April 2, 2020
The market crashc has made strong, established brands attractive. Here's a stock to make the most of this opportunity...
One Stock that is All Charged Up for the Post Coronavirus Rebound April 1, 2020
A stock with strong moat is currently trading near 5-year lows.
Sorry Warren Buffett, I'm Following This Man Instead of You in 2020 March 30, 2020
This man warned of an impending market correction while everyone else was celebrating the renewed optimism in early 2020...

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Can India Inc. continue its current way of doing business?". Click here!

6 Responses to "Can India Inc. continue its current way of doing business?"


Oct 23, 2011

After Mr. Rajiv Gandhi India never had a single party government. The next person capable of doing something is Mr. Modi of Gujarat. But there it is single party government. With the regional parties coming to forefront and their short term petty interests will any national party depending on them to survive will ever show the political will to stop the petroleum subsidy and various other populist measures which is really pulling India down on various infrastructural projects. The most prominent one is the power and next is the national highways. Now with our great Mr. Anna Hazare and his team the things are now getting worse. With our babus in the Delhi South and North Block will just go on pushing the files on contentious issues without taking any decisions. Therefore India will remain like this with our politicians just think for only the 5 years and not beyond.


Harsh Gupta

Oct 23, 2011

Generally agree with what your report states.If we professionalise governance including introducing more elements of E- governance and improve/enhance effiency/ effectiveness of service delivery for inclusive growth India's growth rate can be in double digits in a sustainable way forthe next decade,besides reducing poverty,addressing education and health sectors in a more focussed way and improving overall quality of life
in larger increments.I a retired senior civil servant,that there serous gaps in commitment and accountability in various government and semi-government
structures. On the other hand government has available with it the recommendations/reports of innumerable commissions/committees on various aspects of required public policy reforms, monitoring and evaluation.In addition best practice experience of the developed countries and multilateral agencies studies and reports are also available.While the anti-corruption agitation by civil society activists has the merit of raising public awareness and pressure on power strutures, much more is required for creating a momentum which can move on its own once the initial push is available through a series of measures on which ther is national consensus



Oct 22, 2011

Unless you get rid of the crony capitalist cum oligarch ( Marwadi+Gujju+ Bania Aggarwal) model there is no way we can cross becoming even a middle income country - hopefully we will reach there . Do you see any competition or inovation from these communities in India worth the name ? Ambanis own the government ( Anil is a kadka Gujju financed by the Chinese Govt . He is the pimp for the Chinese thugs ) Mukesh cannot develop any technology nor buy deep water extraction companies , nor build a refinery without Bechtel al .Tatas make a nani nano which burns, ! The Punjabi clans of DLF, Mittals practically live off the GOI oxygen . Are these communities going to invent anything ? The South Indian oligarchs are as bad . Infy /TCS are Kannada and Tamil Brahmin clubs of back office, body shopping hamals, period , They will remain that way . When the rupee weakens they wax eloquently on their superior Brahmin brains which cannot even come up with a basic Android phone or a Indian languages Tool bar let alone spear fish and attack Chinese Govt secret website , when the rupee strengthens they rush to their idli sambhar for solace. The rest of India must rise the NORTH and SOUTH Indian Mafias have failed this country .


shome suvra

Oct 22, 2011

India requires more industrialization rather than only redistribution of income. The current scenario demands the liberal fiscal policy to strengthen the supply side eg; investment subsidy as RBI has tight monetary policy to fight inflation.



Oct 22, 2011

Sirs, Today*s analysis of Indian Corp business models, the trend in banking business etc. are excelllent. I am sure the readers are much benefited by ur articles. Continue ur good work. Thanks.


Santosh Bhatnagar

Oct 22, 2011

Most of the private companies in India are family owned, some of these have performed real good and made an international name, these are professionally managed and kept themselves abreast of the competition through technology evolution. Why many of these companies have not performed well is that they do not trust the technical or managerial experts engaged or hired from outside the family. I can cite around 100 such units who made big names and then vanished because they did not trust the technical or managerial experts. The owners or promoters engage the experts but they want them to run the way their forefathers ran, without any development in technology, resulting in the industry getting sick. The units initiated by technical experts made tremendous progress in the beginning but after amassing money, they neglected the technical development side.
The progress of any unit is the joint contribution of its employees and if everones' inputs are not harnessed in a proper way, the unit cannot survive. Many of the hired administrators still believe in divide and rule policy, this results in the failure or breakup. Many a times the family fued is responsible for the failure.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Can India Inc. continue its current way of doing business?". Click here!