Free Reports

Would you pay more to a 25 or a 35 year old?

Apr 21, 2015

In this issue:
» Why management integrity is non-negotiable
» Is India better prepared for a crisis this time?
» How well has Jan Dhan Yojana promoted financial inclusion?
» The RBI should ensure that savers get a good deal
» ...and more!


00:00
Students often go to visit Warren Buffett. And when they do, he often plays a little game on them.

He asks each student to pick a classmate. Not just any classmate, but the classmate they would choose if they could demand a claim on 10% of that classmate's earnings for the rest of their lives. Then he would ask, "Which classmate would you pick and why?"

"Are you going to pick the one with the highest IQ?" asks Buffett. "Are you going to pick the guy who can throw a football the farthest? The one with the highest grades? What qualities will cause you to pick them?"

He follows up with more questions. "Who would you think least likely to succeed? Why?"

He asks the students to take out a sheet of paper and list the positive attributes on the left and the negative ones on the right.

Inevitably, the most useful qualities have nothing to do with IQ, grades or family connections. He then asks the students which of the qualities they are incapable of having and which they are incapable of stopping?

To Buffett, the answer is "none". It's quite simple in the end. Develop qualities from the left and try to stop doing the ones on the right.

And finally he has this piece of solid advice to look for the best partners. "You're looking for three things, generally, in a person," says Buffett. "Intelligence, energy and integrity. And if they don't have the last one, don't even bother with the first two." He then tells them, "Everyone here has the intelligence and energy-you wouldn't be here otherwise. But the integrity is up to you. You weren't born with it; you can't learn it in school."

Buffett and Munger used exactly these filters while evaluating the managers and CEOs of the scores of companies that they have invested in.

The reason I am revisiting this lesson in human resource from the value investing legends is because of a question I was asked by the founder of Equitymaster, Ajit Dayal; some 8 years back. He asked me, "Would you pay more to a 25 or a 35 year old?" Sensing my naive eagerness to reply to his seemingly simple question, he asked me to think hard. "You may definitely want to reward an intelligent and energetic 25 year old that can bring in breakthrough ideas and execute them well. But you should wait to pay him more than a person with far more experience only once the performance matches up."

Doesn't this logic apply in long term investing as well? Think about it. The companies that you invest in for 5-10-20 years are literally partners in your growth. You would want them to be innovative, high growth and high potential ones. But at the same time you would want them to allow you to have a good night's sleep. In other words you should not have to worry about their ability to weather business challenges.

So going by this logic, would you want to pay a lot more for a new high growth loss-making company than a safe, fundamentally solid one with an established track record? Well, the investors in new-age technology business have managed to take to stratospheric levels the valuations of yet to breakeven firms like Flipkart, Snapdeal and Ola Cabs. So much so that the market valuations of these unlisted entities have tipped the market cap of bluechips like M&M, Tata Steel and Indian Hotels. The disruptive digital edge of the new companies is apparently a lot more enticing to the investors than the boring brick and mortar models of the bluechips.

However, what you must not forget is that the bluechip-like market value of the new entities does not make them bluechips. As I learnt from Ajit, you would definitely want to pay a premium for these high potential stocks only once they prove themselves to be worthy of partnering you in your long term portfolio.

How do you go about selecting your 'partners' for your long term wealth building portfolio? Let us know your comments or share your views in the Equitymaster Club.

--- Advertisement ---
Some Old Rules Are Meant To Be Broken...

If you follow the old rules, you might not even think of investing in small caps.

And you might miss out on some amazing returns.

Returns like 217% in 3 years and 11 months, 177% in around 2 years, 100% in 1 year 8 months and many more...

Sure, not all small caps deliver such good returns. Only a few, well chosen, solid small caps can give such returns.

But Equitymaster has been finding such 'hidden gems' for the past 7 years. And discounting a few misses, a majority of our recommendations have given good returns for our subscribers.

Click here for full details...

------------------------------


02:15
At a time when the worries of a currency war are still keeping central bankers on the edge of their seat, Dr Raghuram Rajan seems less worried. The governor of India's central bank, RBI, has over the past few months tactically built up a larger forex kitty. Something that he believes will not just aid India counter rise in global interest rates but also avert a currency crisis, if any. As per Reuters, India's forex reserves stood at US$ 343 bn at the end of March 2015. It was up more than US$ 20 bn from December 2014 levels. And it is up a good 13% YoY. However it is not the same story across emerging markets. Across emerging markets excluding China, reserves were US$ 4.89 trillion at the end of March 2015 compared to US$ 4.94 trillion a year ago.

The divergent trend in forex accumulation is to be blamed for the stagnancy in reserves. Now, capital inflows into emerging markets have slowed compared to pre-crisis years. However, unlike the uptrend in forex reserves in economies such as Korea and India, Russia's political instability has cost it a lot of its reserve surplus. Others such as Indonesia and Turkey are being forced to tolerate currency depreciation because of the trade-off between depleting reserves and currency weakening. So, most of the developing economies except China still remain very vulnerable to a possible currency crisis. The Indian central bank would do well to be on guard.

03:05
  Chart of the day
Prime Minister Modi's Jan Dhan Yojana has been a big success. Its rapid roll out has ensured that almost every Indian household now has access to a bank account. This was a positive step taken by the government to channel India's vast savings pool into the banking sector. The success of the scheme has attracted a lot of interest. The World Bank has conducted a detailed study. Its findings however, have put a bit of a dampener on the enthusiasm.

As seen from the chart, the large increase in bank accounts has not yet translated into usage. Most new account holders are from rural areas. They still do not perceive bank accounts as a means of saving. Hopefully the idea will catch on soon. Surprisingly, subsidy payments are still not being transferred electronically in a big way. However, it must be kept in mind that these low percentages will improve going forward, hopefully in a big way. We believe financial inclusion is a non-negotiable step to be taken on the road to becoming an economic power.

Financial inclusion still a long way off

04:05
Long time readers of the 5 Minute WrapUp will be aware of our concern about India's current account deficit (CAD). When India's CAD got out of hand in FY14, the rupee collapsed to nearly 70 to a US dollar and India earned entry into the infamous Fragile Five club. Things have certainly improved since then. Gold import curbs as well as falling crude prices have led some to believe that India may end up with a current account surplus in FY16! We won't be that optimistic. We believe it is important to learn from history.

As per a very interesting article in the Mint, the sharp deterioration in the CAD during FY11-FY13 was largely a result of a jump in household spending. Traditionally, India was a high savings rate country. However, the massive increase in subsidy spending during the UPA years was a leading cause of high inflation. This discouraged savers and they responded by increasing consumption (including Gold). Had they received sufficiently high interest on bank deposits, the situation would have been totally different. The lesson is thus clear. To avoid a repeat of the 2013 crisis, the RBI must encourage savings. The best way is to ensure the interest on bank deposits is higher than inflation.

04:40
Meanwhile, the Indian stock markets were trading flat. The BSE-Sensex was trading down 12 points (0.04%) at the time of writing. Banking stocks were leading the gainers while pharma stocks were leading the losers. The midcap and small cap indices were outperforming with gains between 0.2 and 0.3%. Most Asian indices ended in the green. European indices have also opened on a positive note.

04:50
 Today's investing mantra
"Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing." - Warren Buffett

This edition of The 5 Minute WrapUp is authored by Tanushree Banerjee.

Today's Premium Edition.

MEP Infra IPO: Our View

Equitymaster analyses Initial Public Offering (IPO) of MEP Infrastructure Ltd, one of the largest road toll operators in India
Read On...Get Access

Recent Articles

Let Safety Work FOR Your Retirement Not AGAINST It December 12, 2017
A small group of people have been using this strategy, to retire wealthy, over the past fifteen years.
Which Chips Do You Want to Own - Black, White or Blue? December 9, 2017
The best way to retire wealthy - Buy real blue chips over poker blue chips
If You're Not Looking for 'Excitement' but 'Big Returns' from Stocks, This Is for You December 7, 2017
One does not have to necessarily invest only in 'exciting' stocks to become wealthy.
The Big 'I' That Can Topple the HDFC Banks and Wells Fargos of the World December 5, 2017
A risk that cannot be ignored in even the biggest and well run businesses.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Would you pay more to a 25 or a 35 year old?". Click here!

3 Responses to "Would you pay more to a 25 or a 35 year old?"

Kasturi Gajla

Apr 22, 2015

I loved your first article today.
Thanks for the great work. Your all articles and newsletters are highly educational and very lucidly written.

Great Job Equitymater team.

Like 

Kirandeep Atwal

Apr 22, 2015

This is misinterpretation of what Warren Buffet was saying.

How many times publishers turned down Harry Potter. It seems that the author of Harry Potter was much smarter than the people who turned her down. All the greatest business tycoons were once inexperienced. What is experience -- anyone can get that, given time. But you cannot fake intelligence, energy and integrity.

Of course, talented recruit can outshine you. They could fly up the career ladder and even overtake you. This is the fear that haunts most of the people.

But remember, these people will go to the top with or without you. What is the age of Napoleon, Alexander and Mark Zuckerberg?

I know you will not publish this. You will only publish the thoughts of people that are inline with your views.

Like 

Anis

Apr 21, 2015

I used to ask myself why HT recommendations of EM are too late and why not it can be done when the stocks were more cheaper. Today I got the answer “it is the difference between 25 & 35”. This was really an excellent and priceless article. Thanks

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Would you pay more to a 25 or a 35 year old?". Click here!
DISCLOSURES UNDER SEBI (RESEARCH ANALYSTS) REGULATIONS, 2014
INTRODUCTION:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Equitymaster"/"Company") was incorporated on October 25, 2007. Equitymaster is a joint venture between Quantum Information Services Private Limited (QIS) and Agora group.

BUSINESS ACTIVITY:
An independent research initiative, Equitymaster is committed to providing honest and unbiased views, opinions and recommendations on various investment opportunities across asset classes.

DISCIPLINARY HISTORY:
There are no outstanding litigations against the Company, it subsidiaries and its Directors.

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR RESEARCH REPORT:
For the terms and conditions for research reports click here.

DETAILS OF ASSOCIATES:
Details of Associates are available here.

DISCLOSURE WITH REGARDS TO OWNERSHIP AND MATERIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
  1. Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have any financial interest in the subject company.
  2. Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have actual/beneficial ownership of one percent or more securities of the subject company at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the research report.
  3. Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of the research report.
DISCLOSURE WITH REGARDS TO RECEIPT OF COMPENSATION:
  1. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  2. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company in the past twelve months.
  3. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  4. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for products or services other than investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  5. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation or other benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the research report.
GENERAL DISCLOSURES:
  1. The Research Analyst has not served as an officer, director or employee of the subject company.
  2. Equitymaster or the Research Analyst has not been engaged in market making activity for the subject company.
Definitions of Terms Used:
  1. Buy recommendation: This means that the investor could consider buying the concerned stock at current market price keeping in mind the tenure and objective of the recommendation service.
  2. Hold recommendation: This means that the investor could consider holding on to the shares of the company until further update and not buy more of the stock at current market price.
  3. Buy at lower price: This means that the investor should wait for some correction in the market price so that the stock can be bought at more attractive valuations keeping in mind the tenure and the objective of the service.
  4. Sell recommendation: This means that the investor could consider selling the stock at current market price keeping in mind the objective of the recommendation service.
Feedback:
If you have any feedback or query or wish to report a matter, please do not hesitate to write to us.