Turnaround story vs. Boring business: Which is better?

Jul 22, 2015

In this issue:
» Cheaper in China: Steel or cabbage?
» Banks lose out to cheaper fund sources
» ...and more!

One of the key tenets of value investing is to invest in stocks that are trading at a sufficient discount to their intrinsic value. But does this hold true for each and every such stock?

Let us consider two companies that are trading at low valuations. For instance, Company A has had a few years of poor operational performance. This could be due to a variety reasons such as inability to adapt to the changing market dynamics, not much innovative capabilities, ineffective management, surging costs and the like. The market has already punished the stock for this and now the valuations are so attractive that it looks like a value buy at that moment. What more, since things have reached rock bottom, one assumes that they can only improve from thereon. Plus, should the company begin focusing more on innovation and keep costs under control, the upside from this point onwards is only huge. In other words, Company A could be a classic turnaround story.

Let us consider Company B. It is one of those companies that have been growing revenues and profits at a steady pace. It has quite a boring business; certainly not a fancy tech start-up that has been hogging the limelight these days. There is no real story in this case that can catch the fancy of investors, other than the fact that it is a solid, healthy business. The only thing is that the company is trading at low valuations only because investors have probably forgotten it exists. The business is boring after all and the management just goes about running the business rather than focusing on where its stock price is headed.

From a purely numbers point of view, both the companies are attractive because both of them are trading at depressed prices. But if you had to still make a choice between the two, which one would you go with.

Most people investing in equities are attracted towards the next big stories, themes and interesting ideas. So the prospect of a turnaround story is always mouth watering. But it is not as simple as it seems. The assumption is that the company can capture the glory of its past and so the benefits are immense. But there is never any guarantee of this. The turnaround hinges a lot on dramatic changes in the way the business is being run, which may or may not happen. If it works, investors benefit tremendously, but if does not, the losses are crippling as well.

A boring business on the other hand may not have all the fanciness of a turnaround story. But it has something that the prudent value investor will certainly not ignore: a business that has been growing surely but steadily, a management that knows what it is doing and does a very good job of allocating capital.

No prizes for guessing that our preference lies with Company B!

Of course, there will be the odd super turnaround story of a stock that will go on to give fabulous long term returns. But if one would like to invest over and over in one of the above kinds of stocks, we certainly like to think that the long term odds would favour an investor always going for boring but rock solid businesses.

Does the prospect of a turnaround story excite you or do you prefer stable, steady businesses? Let us know your comments or share your views in the Equitymaster Club.

--- Advertisement ---
One Proven Way To Increase Your Overall Returns...

Yes! Investing in the right small caps has the potential to increase your overall returns too.

Some of the small caps we have recommended have given returns like 250% in 2 years, 110% in 2 years 4 months, 288% in 2 years and 5 months, 124% in just about 7 months and more...

And you know that every individual return adds to your overall gains.

So just think how quickly you could build up your wealth with a handful of good small caps in your portfolio.

Don't delay...

So click here to find out how you could become privy to high potential small cap stocks much before other investors...


What do you think is cheaper in China: steel or cabbage? If you thought it was the latter, think again. The big plunge in stock markets in China has had a toll on commodity prices in the country too. So much so that iron ore prices have plunged to a fresh 6 year low. And so on a per tonne basis, steel (for which iron ore is a key raw material) is cheaper than cabbage.

As reported in the Guardian, iron ore prices have fallen by more than 10% to US$ 44.5 per tonne and this is the lowest level since May 2009, during the depths of the global financial crisis. Little wonder then that stocks of international metals and mining companies have taken a beating.

The scenario is not different back home where many of the Indian metal companies are also grappling with lower commodity prices. Many of them are forced to lower their prices as well to align with international prices and this has taken a toll on the overall performance of these companies. When the tide is expected to turn is anybody's guess.

 Chart of the day
The banking industry has been highly impacted by the slowdown in the economy. On one hand, the sluggish credit offtake has reduced its interest income. At the same time increased loan defaults by the troubled infrastructure sector have led to increased provisioning and reduced earnings for banks. Also piling up of bad debts has constrained the capital strength particularly of public sector banks. But economic recession may not be the sole reason for the subdued financials of banks in FY15. An interesting study has pointed out that banks may have also battled competition from non-banking sources during the year.

As per a study, banks saw their share in incremental fund flows in the economy erode from 65% in FY14 to 45% in FY15. And the gap has been filled in by non-banking fund sources such as corporate debt and equity financing. According to the study, the net portfolio inflows in to corporate debt stood at $17 bn in FY15 as compared to net portfolio outflows of $4 bn in FY14. On the other hand, equity financing from foreign direct investment (FDI) and primary market issues increased from $34 bn in FY14 to $46 bn in FY15. The falling corporate bond spreads in turn fuelled the rally in equity markets translating into cheaper capital for companies. Thus higher inflows of foreign funds provided companies with low cost alternatives to bank credit in FY15.

Banks lose out to cheaper fund sources
Data Source: RBI & Edelweiss Securities

Even as corporate debt funds have gained importance in FY15, the wait for the rupee denominated offshore funds or 'masala bonds' got a little longer. Indian companies that raise funds through External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) are eligible to issue masala bonds. The Reserve Bank of India has already come out with draft norms for the bonds last month. But in the absence of guidelines on the withholding tax structure for foreign institutional investors (FIIs), domestic companies may not risk raising money through this route for the fear of ending up paying a higher coupon rate. Presently, the withholding tax for FIIs is 5% for ECBs as well as domestic corporate bonds. And the draft guidelines have proposed the maximum limit on pricing of the bonds at not above 5% over government bond yields of similar maturity. As withholding tax structure for masala bonds would require amendments in income tax laws, they are unlikely to be implemented any time soon.

After a weak opening, Indian markets gained ground in subsequent trading hours as buying activity intensified across index heavyweights. At the time of writing, the Sensex was trading higher by about 272 points, with gains being seen in stocks from the banking and auto spaces. Stocks from the IT space were, however, trading weak. Both the midcap and smallcap indices also were trading firm today, with the BSE-Midcap and BSE-Smallcap indices up by about 1% each.

 Today's investing mantra
"The secret to investing is to figure out the value of something - and then pay a lot less" - Joel Greenblatt.

This edition of The 5 Minute WrapUp is authored by Radhika Pandit (Research Analyst) and Madhu Gupta (Research Analyst).

Today's Premium Edition.

Should you be excited about investing in 'new economy' companies?

A look at how e-commerce companies stack up against older economy companies as investments.
Read On...Get Access

Recent Articles

All Good Things Come to an End... April 8, 2020
Why your favourite e-letter won't reach you every week day.
A Safe Stock to Lockdown Now April 2, 2020
The market crashc has made strong, established brands attractive. Here's a stock to make the most of this opportunity...
One Stock that is All Charged Up for the Post Coronavirus Rebound April 1, 2020
A stock with strong moat is currently trading near 5-year lows.
Sorry Warren Buffett, I'm Following This Man Instead of You in 2020 March 30, 2020
This man warned of an impending market correction while everyone else was celebrating the renewed optimism in early 2020...

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Turnaround story vs. Boring business: Which is better?". Click here!

2 Responses to "Turnaround story vs. Boring business: Which is better?"


Jul 23, 2015




Jul 22, 2015

Lovely analysis of Flipkart by Rahul.

I sometimes wonder how well-heeled investors can also be as foolish as the man on the street. :)


Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Turnaround story vs. Boring business: Which is better?". Click here!
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Equitymaster"/"Company") was incorporated on October 25, 2007. Equitymaster is a joint venture between Quantum Information Services Private Limited (QIS) and Agora group. Equitymaster is a SEBI registered Research Analyst under the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014 with registration number INH000000537.

An independent research initiative, Equitymaster is committed to providing honest and unbiased views, opinions and recommendations on various investment opportunities across asset classes.

There are no outstanding litigations against the Company, it subsidiaries and its Directors.

For the terms and conditions for research reports click here.

Details of Associates are available here.

  1. 'subject company' is a company on which a buy/sell/hold view or target price is given/changed in this Research Report
  2. Equitymaster has financial interest in SAIL and BHEL.
  3. Equitymaster’s investment in the subject company is as per the guidelines prescribed by the Board of Directors of the Company. The investment is however made solely for building track record of its services.
  4. Equitymaster's Associate has financial interest in Mahindra and Mahindra
  5. Equitymaster’s Research Analyst or his/her relative have no financial interest in the subject company.
  6. Neither Equitymaster, it’s Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have actual/beneficial ownership of one percent or more securities of the subject company at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the research report.
  7. Neither Equitymaster, it’s Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of the research report.
  1. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  2. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company in the past twelve months.
  3. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  4. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for products or services other than investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  5. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation or other benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the research report.
  1. The Research Analyst has not served as an officer, director or employee of the subject company.
  2. Equitymaster or the Research Analyst has not been engaged in market making activity for the subject company.
Definitions of Terms Used:
  1. Buy recommendation: This means that the investor could consider buying the concerned stock at current market price keeping in mind the tenure and objective of the recommendation service.
  2. Hold recommendation: This means that the investor could consider holding on to the shares of the company until further update and not buy more of the stock at current market price.
  3. Buy at lower price: This means that the investor should wait for some correction in the market price so that the stock can be bought at more attractive valuations keeping in mind the tenure and the objective of the service.
  4. Sell recommendation: This means that the investor could consider selling the stock at current market price keeping in mind the objective of the recommendation service.
If you have any feedback or query or wish to report a matter, please do not hesitate to write to us.