|»5 Minute Wrap Up by Equitymaster|
On This Day - 22 SEPTEMBER 2015
Does Alibaba Meet The 'Buffett-Would-Buy' Criteria?
In this issue:
And yet, despite all the hype and hoopla, the company didn't in the least bit interest Warren Buffett. Now why is that?
To answer this question, we must first understand the types of businesses that would interest Buffett. To this end, Charlie Munger, Buffett's partner at Berkshire Hathaway, offers an interesting analogy...
A hypothetical rich Atlanta businessman, Mr Glotz (Buffett's alter ego), is very keen to turn US$2 million into US$2 trillion by investing in businesses over the next 150 years. To decide which businesses he will invest in, Mr Glotz will have meetings with various CEOs not lasting more than 15 minutes. So those companies need to have compelling businesses before Mr Glotz even considers investing in them.
Now Mr Glotz will zero in on those companies based on how well he thought they had built an indomitable global moat based on a strong trademark and a 'universal appeal' that compels consumers to buy almost addictively.
In this 'analogy', Coca Cola fits the bill perfectly. Alibaba does not. Let us see why.
Coca Cola is not just some generic beverage. But a strong, legally protected trademark. It is a powerful brand with just the kind of unbreachable moat that Buffett/Glotz so admires. It is also a brand with longstanding universal appeal that consumers will continue to buy. Moreover, changes in technology aren't likely to impact the brand's moat.
The same cannot be said for Alibaba. Ecommerce is a very competitive space, and Alibaba does not boast of competitive advantages that set it apart from the rest. It also does not enjoy the same universal appeal of companies such as Amazon and eBay. Moreover, given the pace of technological changes, there is a big question mark whether Alibaba is equipped to respond to those changes.
But what if the price of Alibaba fell significantly to the point that valuations began to look compelling? Mind you, while the quality of a business is crucial for Buffett, he also emphasises the need to pay the right price.
Indeed, since listing last year, Alibaba has lost 30% of its value. Does that change Buffett's view on the company? No.
Even if the price fall brings Alibaba to more attractive levels, Buffett may have doubts over the long term sustainability of the company's moat, if any.
The lesson for the value investor is that it is crucial for these factors to come together: Not only must the business boast of a strong sustainable moat, but its stock has to be attractively priced as well. One cannot compromise for the other.
This is the approach that my team and I follow for ValuePro, our portfolio recommendation service. We focus on only those businesses that have strong competitive advantages in their fields. Furthermore, only if they are trading at attractive valuations do we consider buying them for our portfolios and recommending our subscribers to do the same.
Other points in favour of this argument is that financial engineering and access to cheap funds has allowed companies to improve their balance sheets and thus their earnings profile; something which may not be sustainable once the ZIRP trend reverses.
On the other side, experts are arguing the high payouts and quality of earnings justify such valuation levels. Essentially, companies are paying out a big chunk of their profits. This would largely be a function of capex and growth levels being way lower than earlier. But again, this brings us back to the point of whether such a trend would be sustainable incase the US returns to its capex cycle and in the process invests more and pays out less.
All we can say is that at the current juncture, the times are very interesting. Investors would do well to stick to the basics and remember the basics - the odds of making good money reduce as and when one pays up more for stocks.
The fact of the matter is that FIIs have a big role to play in Indian stock markets and thus any volatility in the US would make EMs (including India) quite vulnerable to their whims and fancies. Investors would do well to be aware of such risks.
As you can see, the chart very much puts in perspective the cost advantage that India has when compared to its global and emerging market peers. And this is despite the rising incomes in India. In fact, India is believed to have swapped places with China this year, making it one of the lowest paying nations for mid-career IT professionals. Average annual salaries for mid level professional in India stood at the range of US$ 41,200 in 2015 as compared to that of about US$ 42,700 in China and US$ 132,900 in the US.
It must be noted that the figures do not take into consideration the purchasing power parity. So while the cost arbitrage remains intact, Indian IT firms cannot rest easy. That's because their clients are no longer only interested in cost savings. In an extremely challenging global economy, western corporations want Indian IT firms to deliver a more compelling value proposition in terms of growth prospects. Not all of the Indian IT firms will be up to the task we believe.
Many Indians do not give much thought to retirement planning. While they focus on leading a rich and fulfilling life in their younger years providing for their kids and families, most are not able to maintain that lifestyle once they become senior citizens. Anisa Virji, the Managing Editor of Common Sense Living, has made a very strong case for retirement planning and why it is necessary if you want to continue leading a rich, independent life without having to depend on your children. Well, if you are serious about living well today and retiring well tomorrow, I recommend you read Anisa's thoughts on this and how you can get access to the Ultimate Retirement Bundle...
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement
Disclosure & Disclaimer: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (Research Analyst) bearing Registration No. INH000000537 (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. The Author does not hold any shares in the company/ies discussed in this document. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed in this document under any of its other services.
This document is confidential and is supplied to you for information purposes only. It should not (directly or indirectly) be reproduced, further distributed to any person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose whatsoever, without the consent of Equitymaster.
This document is not directed to, or intended for display, downloading, printing, reproducing or for distribution to or use by, any person or entity, who is a citizen or resident or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, reproduction, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or what would subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. If this document is sent or has reached any individual in such country, especially, USA, Canada or the European Union countries, the same may be ignored.
This document does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Our research recommendations are general in nature and available electronically to all kind of subscribers irrespective of subscribers' investment objectives and financial situation/risk profile. Before acting on any recommendation in this document, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. The price and value of the securities referred to in this material and the income from them may go down as well as up, and subscribers may realize losses on any investments. Past performance is not a guide for future performance, future returns are not guaranteed and a loss of original capital may occur. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster and its affiliates do not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The views/opinions expressed are our current opinions as of the date appearing in the material and may be subject to change from time to time without notice. This document should not be construed as an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any security or asset in any jurisdiction. Equitymaster and its affiliates, its directors, analyst and employees will not be responsible for any loss or liability incurred to any person as a consequence of his or any other person on his behalf taking any decisions based on this document.
As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (Research Analyst) 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407