Was this Alan Greenspan's plan all along?

Jan 5, 2012

Baltimore, Maryland

Hey...that rascal, Alan Greenspan, is back in the newspapers. And this time he has something sensible to say: "The emerging fight over the future of the welfare state, a paradigm without serious political challenge in eight decades, is accentuating the center's declining. The welfare sate has run up against a brick wall of economic reality and fiscal book-keeping. Congress, having enacted increases in entitlements without visible means of funding them, is on the brink of a stalemate...'
Let's back up to bring Dear Readers fully into the picture. Alan Greenspan came to Washington in the '70s...to join Gerald Ford's Council of Economic Advisors. But he arrived with some very unusual baggage. Accompanying him at his swearing in ceremony was none other than Ayn Rand herself, who said that Greenspan was her "man in Washington."

Greenspan was a member of her "collective" in New York, a group of anarcho-libertarian-randites who got together and argued about how to build a better world order. They were in agreement about the basics - government had to be cut down to size. And governments' paper money had to be replaced by gold.

Greenspan wrote a famous defense of gold, pointing out that paper money was merely a way of stealing money from the people. You would think that would have disqualified him from taking over the top job at the Fed. After all, America's central bank was charged with promoting and protecting the value of its paper money. And after 1971, that was no easy mission; the dollar had no real value at all.

But Greenspan was a great schmoozer...and somehow he schmoozed his way into the executive branch...and then into the Fed. He was on the job at the Fed when America's finances started to spin out of control. As a share of GDP, financial sector debt doubled on his watch. Each time, the economy threatened to come to its senses, Greenspan gave it more credit. In emergency of the recession of 2001, Greenspan cut rates below the level of consumer price inflation - and left them there for years. This was not exactly what you would have expected from a hard-money Randite. Instead, you might have expected him to "pull a Volcker," protecting the nation's money...and its financial integrity, even at the cost of his own career. But Greenspan had long sense left his friends, his integrity and his beliefs behind (Ayn Rand died on his birthday).

The emergency low rates lasted much longer than the emergency. But 4 years later they had created another emergency - the housing and finance bubble - which blew up in 2007. By then, Alan Greenspan had retired.

Since then we have heard from him from time to time. Usually, his newspaper columns have been little more than weak apologia and lame denials. He claimed, for example, that the bubble in housing invisible...when we Dear Readers saw it very clearly...and that there was nothing that he could have done to stop it.

But now he has a new theme. And we are wondering whether it is not time to reappraise his career and his character.

He now sees with both eyes. "We face a revolution," he says. "Arithmetic demands it."

Whence cometh this revolution? The young have no jobs. The old have no savings. The middle class is becoming more and more desperate. The Wall Street Journal:
More aging Americans are doing something they never would have imagined: turning to family for financial aid. Some are even asking their children for a place to live.

The problem has been building as more Americans 55 and older have lost jobs or run through savings faster than expected.

Thirty-nine percent of adults with parents 65 and older reported giving parents financial aid in the past year, according to a September Pew Research Center survey. Some parents may have trouble acknowledging it: 10% of parents 65 and older reported receiving aid
The arithmetic that demands a revolution is the arithmetic of a broke welfare state. It makes promises, based on assumptions of growth and prosperity. Now, with neither growth nor prosperity at hand, the politicos wonder how to make good on the promises.

They talk about raising taxes. But no serious observer thinks they could raise enough new money - net - by increasing taxes in order to forestall bankruptcy.

They borrow money too. But the end of that must be approaching too. The average debt level among OECD countries is over 400% of GDP. At a real interest rate of 5%, one dollar of output out of every 5 must be applied to debt service. That is as if every Monday's work had to be devoted to the dead, rather than the living.

In Europe, all around the periphery, lending rates are edging near the point where lending has to stop. In America, fear of Europe keeps lending rates - for the US government - low. But the more it borrows, the deeper its hole becomes. For the more it owes the less likely it will be to pay it back. And sooner or later lenders are going to realize that buying debt from the world's biggest debtor - who continues to borrow more and more money it cannot pay back - is not a great way to preserve capital.

Let's see. Can't tax...can't borrow...then, what can the feds do to pay their bills and honor their commitments? Print money

Yes, dear reader. That's what it will probably come to. That is the endgame of paper money schemes. And when the government prints money...as in Zimbabwe or Argentina...or Weimar Germany...all hell breaks loose.

It makes us wonder. What if it were Alan Greenspan's plan all along? What if he really were Ayn Rand's man in Washington? What if he intended to bankrupt the US government, by setting up a financial calamity?

Maybe he knew it was inevitable anyway. Maybe he figured that it was easier to go along with it than to fight it...and that it took him where he really wanted to go - towards the collapse of the paper dollar and the Big Government of the USA.

What if he weren't such a scoundrel after all? ---------------------------------------- Did you miss the Webinar? ----------------------------------------

Equitymaster's Webinar on the Future Prospects for the Indian Economy with Mr Ajit Dayal was broadcasted on 30th of December, 2011.

The webinar answered questions that could be troubling any Indian Investor today. Where is the Indian Economy headed in 2012? Is Gold still a good investment? Could the Stock Market touch the 21000 figure in 2012?

If you missed watching the webinar, here is your chance to access the same.

Click Here to watch: Indian Economy - From Darling to Damned (Rebroadcast)

And let's understand what lies ahead for India and how could this impact your investments.


*** We are giving Alan Greenspan the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps we should reconsider Thomas L. Friedman's oeuvre too?

Friedman was among those who pushed and applauded the administration of George Armstrong Bush into the war in Iraq. He didn't mention it at the time, but now he tells us that the reason he backed the war was because he was curious.

"Could we collaborate with the people of Iraq," he wanted to know, "to change the political trajectory of this pivotal state in the heart of the Arab world and help tilt it and the region onto a democratizing track?"

There are a lot of things we'd like to know too. Such as whether Tom Friedman knows a mixed metaphor when he writes one. Or whether he sustained some form of brain injury as a child that causes him to want to experiment with the lives of millions of people - killing hundreds of thousand in the process. Or that when he talks about a "democratizing track" is he referring to the kind of track that got Adolph Hitler or Benito Musolini elected? Or is it some kind of track where voters get run around and around until they get worn out and don't care what S.O.B. gets elected?

Apparently, Friedman saw a 2002 report which said Iraq had a "deficit of freedom, a deficit of knowledge and a deficit of women's empowerment." That was enough for him; he was ready start a war as a result.

Well, maybe if we had seen the major issues framed so clearly we would have been more curious too.

And now that the test is completed, Friedman is happy:

"I don't know if Iraq will make it...but creating this opportunity was an important endeavor....I have nothing but respect for the Americans, Brits and Iraqis who paid the price to make it possible."

Yes, thanks to you dead people...we'll get to see what happens when you invade a foreign country, kill a lot of people, spend a lot of money, and then leave. Thanks a lot.

But maybe Friedman has a hidden agenda too. Maybe this jackass thing is just an act. Maybe he too is merely helping the US along to its rendezvous with destiny. All empires die. Maybe Friedman figures it's inevitable. 'The sooner the better,' he may say to himself. Prodding the US into the spending $3 trillion on a pointless war merely helps it towards the tomb.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

A New Infrastructure Boom March 26, 2019
Selva Freigedo talks about the potential in 5G network and how it could transform the way we communicate.
A 40 Somethings Guide to YouTube Hits March 20, 2019
Vivek dwells into a new YouTube phenomenon.
As the Economy Slows Down, Maruti and Two-Wheeler Companies Cut Production March 19, 2019
The country's largest car maker has cut production by more than a fourth.
In Supporting Demonetisation, RBI Behaved Like an Old Uncle Not Willing to Take a Stand March 13, 2019
The minutes of the meeting of the RBI Board which happened before demonetisation have been released.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Was this Alan Greenspan's plan all along?". Click here!

3 Responses to "Was this Alan Greenspan's plan all along?"


Jan 5, 2012

Hi Sharad and Bill.
Interesting article and comments. However, placing Bush in the league of Hitler et al. seems hackneyed thought. It has become a fashion to make such shocking, brutal, and irrelevant comparison like this which are now a days routinely being made in Indian politics. Sensationalism is the trick that media has taught to each people, specially in India. Any way, I would like to draw your attention that hundreds of thousands of people have been killed not only by Hitler and likes, which was obviously crime, but also in Sundry wars by kings that are not so well known and hence lack sensation-quotient to get mentioned any where. Recall turk invaders, alexander the great etc. What Bush did needs to be looked into the context of a safe America that provides Bill and many others a safe place to live, mediate and write great articles that we all enjoy. If not convinced, try living in any city of Pakistan and you will realize the virtues of bush's deeds. What Bush did needs a liberal dose of courage, something we in India can never appreciate as we have many to sacrifice at the altar of terrorism.



Jan 5, 2012

Hey Bill , Is Bush & co. is the part of this.
...........divinecosmos start here davids blog 995 lawsuit end tyranny as hyperlink are not allowed as comment so you can find it by Google. i have deleted all web code. plz



Jan 5, 2012

Hi Bill,

1. I read your newsletter with great interest and find them brutally honest and hard hitting and having the guts to tell that "the king is naked". I remember about 23 years ago in 1988 when I was freshly out of college I had commented to a group of visiting American Consultants from Westinghouse that Americans are living far beyond their means, the guys rolled their eyes wondering at the audacity of a third world guy criticizing US. In retrospect, I feel vindicated about my observation.

2. How is George Bush any different from Adolf Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini having single handedly causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people including Americans and British not to speak of financial calamity he brought upon Americans and the world? Should he not be tried for "crimes against humanity"? It is a surprise that he was let go so easily and moving around as a free man.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Was this Alan Greenspan's plan all along?". Click here!