People have a desire and not need for wealth - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 2 February 2011
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
People have a desire and not need for wealth A  A  A

Baltimore, Maryland

It's still the same old story
A fight for love and glory
'As time goes by'
By Herman Hupfeld
Dow up 148 points yesterday. Gold rose $5.

----------------------One Year FREE Access ----------------------
Equitymaster's "Intelligent" Portfolio Tracker just got even better... Sign up for one year, and get the next year's subscription absolutely FREE of charge! Don't Wait! Register NOW!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

And look at the euro. It's back up to $1.38. Or, looked at from the other direction...the dollar is headed down again.

All that new money is having the effect Ben Bernanke wanted - sort of. It's boosting asset prices. People feel richer. So, they spend more money. Trouble is, they're not really richer. And after they spend more...they have less.

Here's a subject you're going to hear more about: wealth inequality. The rich have gotten richer. The poor have gotten poorer. People don't know why. But they don't like it. And they figure it has something to do with the rich rigging the system. They're right...but not in the way they think.

But who cares if some people are richer than other people?

People obviously have a need for wealth. That is, they must eat. They need shelter, clothing... They don't really need much more than that.

But there's more to it, isn't there? People have a desire for wealth. For status. For power. These things are more important than wealth itself.

Why? After a bare minimum, wealth doesn't really affect a person's survival. You don't need more than the basics for that. Arguably, anything you eat more than what you actually need has a negative effect on your life.

And clothes? You can go to Walmart and get all the clothes you need for $100.

Maybe less.

Shelter? Well, that's a bit more expensive. But there's a guy we see everyday who lives out on the street. He stands in the entrance to the abandoned Greyhound bus station in Baltimore, next to a mattress and a sleeping bag. He always is standing when we come by. And he is always facing south. He never turns his head, neither right nor left, neither up nor down...but he just looks straight ahead to the south.

Arguably, you don't need more shelter than that. He seems to stay there...at no cost whatsoever. Not that we'd recommend it. But you could get a perfectly comfortable trailer for practically nothing.

What's our point? That you don't really NEED much money.

So why bother with it? And why do people care if you have a lot more than they do?

Humans seem driven to fight for wealth, power and status. Partly, you can explain it as a survival mechanism. No, you don't need much money to survive. But for thousands of years, the person who was able to store up a little extra grain...or hunt a little extra meat...was the one who, in time of famine, might survive.

Of course, this is just theory...but you can imagine too that women would want to be close to the fellow who could get food when no one else could. She would want to have his children - fit and able - rather than the children of say, a tax collector or TSA inspector. First, because she might have a better chance of survival. And second, because her children might have a better chance of survival. He might keep them fed - after all, they're his children! Not only that, they might be genetically well suited for survival anyway.

So, the kids that survive are likely to have the same survival instincts as the parents...which is to say, they're likely to be good hunters/providers...or want to hook up with one.

There, anything else you want to know about socio-biology?

No? We didn't think so.

So, let's keep moving. Why did we bring this up?

Just to show that the relative wealth or status of people is very important - even though it is not directly related to their own survivability. Everyone wants to be rich, famous, and an Olympic rower - like the Winkelvoss twins!

Naturally, they've got their eyes open all the time - sizing up the competition. They want to know where they stand. So, they spend a lot of time and effort not only trying to get ahead - trying to become rich, famous, and an Olympic rower - but also trying to bring the other fellow down!

Yes, dear reader, we're sorry to have to tell you this. But jealousy, envy, resentment, backbiting, backstabbing, and income redistribution are just natural human instincts too.

And here's another important point. Since more wealth is only interesting from a RELATIVE point of view...that is, it is only useful when it gives you higher status...a normal, healthy human being cares more about 'fairness' than he does about absolute wealth. Of course, fairness can mean practically anything you want it to mean. It can mean fairness of opportunity - as in, we all play by the same rules. Or it can mean fairness of outcome - as in, we all end up in the same place.

In an up and coming economy, with limited government and low taxes - like the US in the early part of the last century - people care more about fairness of opportunity. People are making money. They're creating status for themselves. Things change fast. You are responsible for creating your own wealth, power and status.

Later, as the economy matures, fairness of outcome becomes more important. New wealth is harder to get. It's harder to move 'up' in society. People get a hold of the government and turn it into a zombie-protector. They use it to make sure the rich get richer and the poor stay poor.

That is when people become very interested in "equality of income." They think it is not fair. And, they're often right. Because, by that time, the elites, the privileged, and the zombies have usually been able to rig the system for their own benefit.

As we put it in this space a week ago, when government meddling plays a bigger role in an economy, having access to the meddlers become more important.

The fight for love and glory continues...but the battlefield moves to the government.

*** "You know, I always try to figure out what license plates are telling me."

The person speaking was probably insane. But you come across a lot of insane people.

He was an electrician we call from time to time. "Sparky," we call him. Maybe he had been shocked too often.

"Well, the numbers mean something. You just have to figure them out. Last night, for example, I saw a license tag with 8 7 59 on it. Well, I knew it was talking to me. Because that was the day I was born. The 7th of August, 1959.

"But why was it speaking to me? Well, I had to read the other license plates and try to decipher it. It's not easy. And it's not always clear. I mean sometime they give you lottery numbers to play. Sometimes they tell you who you should be talking to.

"After I saw my birth date, for example, I saw 301. Well, I knew what that meant. I had to call my mother. That's her area code.

"But I was looking at the auto tags so much, I almost ran into a cement truck. His license tag was a warning. It was 666, you know, the mark of the beast. It was telling me to stay away...watch out for the devil and all his works."

*** What's the matter with apples? Half of them are inedible. We had a beautiful Delicious apple yesterday. Looked great. But the skin was tough. And the fruit was mealy.

That's the trouble. They're meant to look good. Hotels put them in baskets. Businesses display them. They're everywhere. More than half are probably thrown away. They are decorative items. Not foodstuffs.

Some people are like that too.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "People have a desire and not need for wealth". Click here!

5 Responses to "People have a desire and not need for wealth"

Joe

Feb 20, 2011

Good article, interesting to read.

Like 

Jen

Feb 2, 2011

Very interesting article. Good reading.

Like 

abhi

Feb 2, 2011

sir, your starting is quite intres
ting...plzz..start your artical with poem line always.plzz..we love it..

Like 

Saravanan V

Feb 2, 2011

The cycle of demand for equality of opportunities and equality of outcomes.. A wonderful point made.

I have been reading u for a while now.. I like the way of ur writing.

Like 

tinku

Feb 2, 2011

what's the point that you are trying to make. Utter waste of time.

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "People have a desire and not need for wealth". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.