Does an aging population in the US really matter? - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 25 February 2014
Does an aging population in the US really matter? A  A  A

Baltimore, Maryland

Dow up 103 yesterday...into record territory again.

Gold up $14...still recovering last year's losses.

Tomorrow, we intend to outline our big picture view. But today, we're going to reply to colleagues with caveats, quibbles, and corrections.

First, our colleague Merryn Somerset-Webb Scotland, who lives in Edinburgh, Scotland, took issue with our suggestion that small governments are, ceteris paribus, better than big ones:

    If Scotland votes for independence it will be as a socialist nation not a wealthy capitalist one. The result will be profound misery... I really don't think it is something to wish for... Already a disaster in the making... What small countries actually do these days if they aren't tax havens full of educated people (Switzerland) is indulge in one variety or the other of nepotism/theft/corruption/public sector crowding out and then collapse
She's probably right about that. Big country or small one, the ruling elite always wants as much mis-government as the country can afford - and often more!

The whole idea of modern government, we remind readers, is to pretend that the feds work for the citizen. The little guy is led to believe that his enemies will be smitten, that the rich will be robbed so that the stolen loot will be given to him, and that all he holds dear will be protected, enhanced and made obligatory. It's hard to feel sorry for the guy...even when the feds clean him out.

Registrations Closing in Just 5 Days: As you must know, we've just launched our first "Dynamic" portfolio Recommendation Service - Extreme Value Portfolio. And it has received an overwhelming response with hundreds of smart investors joining in within days of launch. However, now that we've already begun creating the portfolio and have also released our first report with the first 3 stock picks, we're sure you understand that we need to close the Founder Member Registrations. So, if you haven't gone through the details yet, we'd recommend you do that right away. Just Click Here...

Meanwhile, another colleague - Chris Hunter of the Bonner Family Office - corrects us. The US consumer is no longer deleveraging, he says. Now, he's borrowing again. Reuters has the story:
    U.S. household debt rose in the latest quarter by the most since before the recession, a sign that Americans may be nearing the end of a multi-year belt-tightening trend, data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York showed on Tuesday.

    Total consumer debt rose 2.1 percent to $11.52 trillion in the fourth quarter of 2013 from $11.28 trillion in the third quarter, the New York Fed said in its quarterly household debt and credit report. The increase, $241 billion, marked the biggest quarterly jump since the third quarter of 2007.
If this is so, it is either 1) mistaken, 2) flukey, or 3) an important new trend. For the moment, we're going with 1 or 2. But we give the American consumer his due. If there is any way for him to get himself into a deeper hole, he'll get out the spade. And the Fed's low-interest rates are waiting for him. And now that he has a little more equity in his house, he may be inclined to start digging.

But he's getting older. He tires faster. And he's seen what happens when he gets himself in over his head. He remembers how uncomfortable it made him feel. Demography is beginning t turn against the 'borrow and spend' economy. So, it is not clear that he will continue and spending at last quarter's rate.

Age and population - along with debt - have big consequences for stock prices. We included a wild figure for the effect of demography on stock prices in yesterday's letter. Even before we were challenged, we had our doubts. So we wrote to the analyst responsible for it to ask for clarification.

It turns out that the NEGATIVE 15% figure was a composite, Much of that number is based on the market value of stocks compared to GDP. At today's levels - based on historical patterns since 1871 - the model predicts that stocks are going down...for a long, long time.

Demography is just one component. Our analyst tells us that demography alone would account for a negative pull equal to about 5% per year - the largest negative number ever recorded. Which makes sense; never have so many people in the US approached retirement at the same time.

But wait. Does an aging population in the US really matter?

"Nearly half of S&P profits come from overseas," one of our colleagues pointed out. "US demographics shouldn't have so much effect."

"But most of those overseas profits come from Europe and Japan," replied another. "And their demographics are worse than our own."

Finally, we decided that the source of S&P profits didn't matter. The model looks at the effect of demographics on stock prices, not on earnings. Prices today are built upon today's earnings - which include overseas sales and profits. The study merely predicts that old people will sell stocks - no matter what their profits - reducing the P/E...and, of course, the prices.

For a nation, as for its capital structure, debt and demography are destiny.

But wait again. Any model based on history assumes that the future will be more or less like the past. It anticipates that extraordinary things that are happening today will be 'normalized' tomorrow. In the past, when stock prices, GDP, debt and demographics have been similar to today's, the process of normalization brought stocks down...a lot. And over a long time.

But never in the past did a nation have QE and Janet Yellen. Stay tuned.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Does an aging population in the US really matter?". Click here!


Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.