The great Indian govt Ponzi scheme is here to stay

Mar 4, 2015

- By Vivek Kaul

Vivek Kaul
In the budget speech that he gave in July 2014, while presenting his first budget, the finance minister Arun Jaitley had said: "My Road map for fiscal consolidation is a fiscal deficit of 3.6 per cent for 2015-16 and 3 per cent for 2016-17." Fiscal deficit is the difference between what a government earns and what it spends. It finances the deficit through borrowing.

In the budget speech that Jaitley gave on February 28, 2015, he put fiscal consolidation on the back burner, when he said: "I will complete the journey to a fiscal deficit of 3% in 3 years, rather than the two years envisaged previously. Thus, for the next three years, my targets are: 3.9%, for 2015-16; 3.5% for 2016-17; and, 3.0% for 2017-18."

This is a worrying trend. Finance ministers want to increase government expenditure but they do not have much of an idea about how to increase its income. In the process, they end up running higher fiscal deficits, which leads to the government borrowing more.

--- Advertisement ---
Small Caps Could Make A Big SPLASH... Literally!

Investing in small caps has at times doubled and even tripled the investments of a select group of investors.

How did they do it?

Well, by knowing two simple facts -- which small stocks to invest in, and when to invest in them.

That knowledge has given them amazing returns like 177% in 2 years, 217% in 3 years and 11 months, 250% in 2 years and 1 month... and more.

Click here to know how YOU too could become privy to that knowledge... and potentially make those kind of returns.
---------------------------


As can be seen from the table that follows the Ponzi ratio of the Indian government has gone up over the years. In 2009-2010, it was at 0.70, and in 2015-2016, it will be at 1.23. Before I go about explaining what this means, it is important to go back in history and talk about a certain Charles Ponzi.

Year Interest payment Repayment of principal Total debt servicing Fiscal Deficit Ponzi ratio
2015-2016 4,56,145 2,25,574 6,81,719 5,55,649 1.23
2014-2015 4,11,354 2,00,955 6,12,309 5,12,628 1.19
2013-2014 3,74,254 1,62,976 5,37,230 5,02,858 1.07
2012-2013 3,13,170 1,15,218 4,28,388 4,90,190 0.87
2011-2012 2,73,150 1,11,933 3,85,083 5,15,990 0.75
2010-2011 2,34,022 1,47,793 4,68,044 3,73,591 1.25
2009-2010 2,13,093 81,764 2,94,857 4,18,482 0.70

Sometime in 1919, Charles Ponzi, an Italian immigrant into the United States, promised investors in the city of Boston that he would double their money (i.e. give them a 100% return on their investment) in 90 days.

Ponzi had hoped that to make this money through a huge arbitrage opportunity that he had spotted among the international postal reply coupons being sold across different countries. But due to various reasons both bureaucratic as well as practical, he could never get around to executing the scheme he had come up with.

But by the time Ponzi realised this, big money was coming into his scheme and he had got used to a good lifestyle. At its peak, the scheme had 40,000 investors who had invested around $ 15 million in the scheme.

Ponzi kept his investors happy by using money brought in by the new investors to pay off the old investors who wanted to redeem their investment. And that is how the scheme operated up to a point. On July 26, 1920, the Boston Post ran a story questioning the legitimacy of the scheme.

Within a few hours, angry depositors lined up at Ponzi’s door, demanding their money back. Ponzi asked his staff to settle their obligations. The anger subsided, but not for long. On Aug 10th, 1920, the scheme collapsed. The auditors, the newspapers and the banks declared that Ponzi was definitely bankrupt.

Ponzi was not the first individual to run a Ponzi scheme, just that his name stuck to it. A Ponzi scheme is essentially a fraudulent investment scheme in which money brought in by new investors is used to redeem the payment that is due to existing investors.

Governments also degenerate into Ponzi schemes over the years, though there is no intention of fraud. This happens when governments do not earn enough and issue new debt to repay old debt as well as pay interest on it.

Take a look at the table shared above. In 2009-2010, the interest payment on the total debt of government of India stood at Rs 2,13,093 crore. Over and above this, the government had to repay around Rs 81,764 crore of debt that was maturing. The total debt servicing cost came to Rs 2,94,857 crore. This amount divided by the fiscal deficit of Rs 4,18,842 crore was around 0.70. This ratio I refer to as the Ponzi ratio.

In 2015-2016, the interest payment on government debt will be at Rs 4,56,145 crore. The maturing debt that needs to be repaid is at Rs 2,25,574 crore. This leads to a total debt servicing cost of Rs 6,81,719 crore. The fiscal deficit for the year has been projected to be at Rs 5,55,649 crore. This means a Ponzi ratio of 1.23.

Hence, the entire fiscal deficit or the difference between what a government earns and what it spends, and which is financed through borrowing, is being used to pay interest on existing debt as well as repay the debt that is maturing. In fact, this is eating into the government revenues as well.

Hence, because of the burgeoning debt the Indian government is spending more and more of its money on servicing debt. This is clearly not a good sign as it leaves a lesser amount of money to be spent on other things.

In the July 2014 budget speech, Jaitley had said: "The Government will constitute an Expenditure Management Commission, which will look into various aspects of expenditure reforms to be undertaken by the Government. The Commission will give its interim report within this financial year." The Commission led by former Reserve Bank of India governor Dr Bimal Jalan, submitted its report in January earlier this year. Nevertheless, the recommendations of the Commission do not seem to have made it into the budget.

The one big-ticket expenditure item that Jaitley had to deal with in this budget were the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission which increased the states' share of central taxes from 32% to 42%. The other big-ticket item that Jaitley should have done something about, he chose to more or less ignore.

The public sector banks need a huge amount of capital in the years to come. The PJ Nayak committee report released in May 2014, estimated that between January 2014 and March 2018 "public sector banks would need Rs. 5.87 lakh crores of tier-I capital."

The report further points out that "assuming that the Government puts in 60 per cent (though it will be challenging to raise the remaining 40 per cent from the capital markets), the Government would need to invest over Rs. 3.50 lakh crores." In the next financial year's budget Jaitley has committed just Rs 7,940 crore towards this.

Further, as Jaitley said in his speech: "uncertainties that implementation of GST will create; and the likely burden from the report of the 7th Pay Commission." This will make expenditure management even more difficult in the years to come. This means that the government Ponzi scheme will only get bigger than it currently is. Let's see how this goes.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

Using Deposits to Rescue Banks is a Bad Idea; It Needs to Be Nipped in the Bud December 11, 2017
The Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance(FRDI) Bill proposes to do just this.
5 Agents of Change Investors Need to Know About Now December 11, 2017
The world is changing fast right now in ways that many investors might not easily recognize or want to admit. If you're not paying attention, you could be letting opportunities pass you by without even realizing it.
Why Economists Are Morons December 9, 2017
Why are most modern economists such nincompoops? The quick answer: because it pays.
Bitcoin is the Best Offshore Bank Account December 8, 2017
The biggest advantage bitcoin has over offshore banks is that it's truly offshore. Not just off Britain's shores, but off every country's shores.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "The great Indian govt Ponzi scheme is here to stay". Click here!

3 Responses to "The great Indian govt Ponzi scheme is here to stay"

Ravindra

Mar 12, 2015

"Hence, because of the burgeoning debt the Indian government is spending more and more of its money on servicing debt. This is clearly not a good sign as it leaves a lesser amount of money to be spent on other things"

But if the government would have never borrowed in the first place, capital expenditure would have suffered. Inadequate capital expenditure would have severely reduced our growth rate and our infrastructure would have suffered too. The higher rate of growth due to higher spending by govt increases GDP and consequently the revenue through taxation.

Like 

M. Agrawal

Mar 5, 2015

as i could see from the chart that, though the number of deficit vis-a-viz debt servicing is getting bigger year by year, but we are improving as we are able to pay something out of govt revenues toward servicing of debt. but yes, the figure of debt and its servicing getting bigger is definitely a cause of concern

Like 

Gopalan

Mar 4, 2015

Dear Mr Vivek,
Many thanks for conscience keepers like you.Further to your great calculations I don't think I will be wrong if I say and quote an article by Mr Deep Mukherjee of India Ratings in my most favourite- First Post- that the 'budget is .......based on an assumption of crude oil remaining below $60-65 per barrel and dollar-rupee at 63 or thereabouts'. I think the FM is fishing in deep troubled waters as the entire budget has been predicated on these assumptions which is absolutely global in nature and completely beyond our control. Will we land in a catastrophe ?

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "The great Indian govt Ponzi scheme is here to stay". Click here!