The mess in public sector banks will not be easy to sort out

Mar 12, 2015

- By Vivek Kaul

Vivek Kaul
The finance minister Arun Jaitley met the chiefs of public sector banks yesterday for a quarterly review of performance. Media reports suggest that among other things the banks were also asked to cut interest rates on their loans.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has cut the repo rate by 50 basis points to 7.5% during the course of this year. Repo rate is the rate at which the RBI lends to banks. But banks haven't passed on this cut to their end consumers.

There are multiple reasons for the same. Typically when the RBI increases the repo rate, the banks match the increase very quickly. But the same thing is not seen when it comes to a scenario where the RBI cuts the repo rate. Banks are normally very slow to pass on cuts to consumers.

As Crisil Research points out in a research note: "Lending rates show upward flexibility during monetary tightening but downward rigidity during easing. Between 2002 and 2004, while the policy rate declined by 200 basis points, lending rates dropped by just 90-100 basis points. Conversely, in 2011-12, when the policy rate rose by 170 basis points, lending rates surged 150 basis points."

--- Advertisement ---
An Easy Solution For A Big Problem...

The stock market has many examples of small caps that went on to become industry leaders.

Small caps are capable of making you Big Returns.

But there is a basic problem - finding good small companies with high potential is not easy.

Yes! Believe it or not, this is the biggest stumbling block when it comes to small companies, and that's why many investors prefer to stay away from small caps.

Not our subscribers though...

For the past 7 years, Equitymaster has guided a small group of people towards many high-potential small caps.

Small caps that have delivered returns like 177% in 2 years, 100% in 1 year 8 months, 217% in 3 years and 11 months, and more.

And now, YOU too can join this group and start benefiting from high-potential small caps.

Click here for full details...
---------------------------


But there is a little more to it than just this. The balance sheets of public sector banks are in a big mess. As the latest financial stability report released by the RBI in December 2014 points out: "PSBs [public sector banks] continued to record the highest level of stressed advances at 12.9 per cent of their total advances in September 2014 followed by private sector banks at 4.4 per cent."

What this clearly shows is that public sector banks are not in great shape. The stressed asset ratio is the sum of gross non performing assets plus restructured loans divided by the total assets held by the Indian banking system. The borrower has either stopped to repay this loan or the loan has been restructured, where the borrower has been allowed easier terms to repay the loan (which also entails some loss for the bank) by increasing the tenure of the loan or lowering the interest rate.

What this means in simple English is that for every Rs 100 given by Indian banks as a loan (a loan is an asset for a bank) nearly Rs 10.7 is in shaky territory. For public sector banks this number is even higher at Rs 12.9.

Also, as the following table from Credit Suisse shows, 46% of public sector banks have a tier I capital of less than 8% and un-provided problem loans greater than 100% of their networth.

62% of PSU banks have Tier-I < 9% and
Un-provided problem loans > 100%
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

What this clearly tells you is that banks many public sector banks do not have enough money to cover their losses. The public sector banks are hoping to recover some of these losses by cutting their deposit rates but staying put on their lending rates. And this leads to a situation where even though the RBI has cut the repo rate once, it hasn't had much impact on the lending rates of banks.

Further, banks do not have enough capital going around. Take the case of Tier I capital mentioned earlier. It is essentially sort of permanent capital that the bank has access to andincludes equity capital and disclosed reserves. As the RBI master circular on this points out: "Tier I capital consists mainly of share capital and disclosed reserves and it is a bank's highest quality capital because it is fully available to cover losses."

As the following table shows the average tier I capital of public sector banks is less than 8%. While this is the more than 6% tier I capital that banks are required to maintain under current norms, it is very close to the 7% tier I capital that banks will have to maintain under the Basel III norms, which need to be fully implemented by March 31, 2018.

Average Tier-I for PSU banks is less than 8%
Source: *3Q15 data not available

This lack of capital has and will continue to constrain the ability of the public sector banks to lend and keep growing. The PJ Nayak committee report released in May 2014, estimated that between January 2014 and March 2018 "public sector banks would need Rs. 5.87 lakh crores of tier-I capital."

The report further points out that "assuming that the Government puts in 60 per cent (though it will be challenging to raise the remaining 40 per cent from the capital markets), the Government would need to invest over Rs. 3.50 lakh crores." In the next financial year's budget the finance minister Arun Jaitley has committed just Rs 7,940 crore towards this.

As analysts Ashish Gupta, Prashant Kumar and Kush Shah of Credit Suisse point out in a recent research note: "The amount allocated is almost the same as our estimate of total dividend likely to be paid by all PSU banks to the government in FY16. This indicates that government capital infusion going forward could be a function of only the profit generation ability of PSU banks."

Also, by allocating a very small amount to towards public sector banks recapitalization, the message that the government seems to be giving the banks is that they are on their own. This in a way is good, given that the government clearly is not in a position to commit the kind of money required to recapitalize the public sector banks.

Nevertheless, many public sector banks are not in a position to raise money on their own, given the mess their balance sheet is in. As the Credit Suisse analysts point out: "Smaller/weaker PSU banks with limited ability to raise capital from markets will be worst affected as there is very little likelihood of getting capital next year as well."

So what is the way out? The only way out for the government is to sell off the weaker banks. There is no reason that the government of India should be running more than 20 banks. It simply doesn't make any sense. Mergers of the weaker banks with the stronger ones is not a feasible option for the simple reason that it will tend to pull down the well performing banks as well.

Of course politically this will be difficult to implement. But that is the kind of strong governance that Narendra Modi promised the people of this country. It is now time to deliver.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

Bitcoin: Just a Game December 13, 2017
Yesterday, we wrote about business as usual. Despite the sound and fury of the last 12 months...
Oil at Two-Year Highs as Saudi Arabia Engages in Its Own "Game of Thrones" December 12, 2017
Recently I identified five agents of change that I believe investors should know about right now. I'd like to add one more to the list: Mohammad bin Salman.
The GOP Tax Bill Is a Deep State Scam December 12, 2017
The mainstream press seems obsessed by the harm being done to Americans... by foreigners.
India Has 8.4 Crore More Workers in Agriculture Than is Economically Feasible December 12, 2017
A new NITI Aayog discussion paper points this out.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "The mess in public sector banks will not be easy to sort out". Click here!

2 Responses to "The mess in public sector banks will not be easy to sort out"

Brij Singh

Mar 12, 2015

The govt needs to take strong steps to set tight the mindset of people by not bending against the threat of strikes. In a country where people are waiting for jobs why should one be afraid of strike. Association of bank officers, union of staff, officers of armed forces, OE so to say any one with majority can force this country to bend before them and get their demands met.the politicians coming to parliament after spending carores which they were given by big industrialist are fighting for the promised they made. None wants to dee the real India where the disparity can be seen daily on streets. So the important aspect is to enforce the laws rather creat more and make every one responsible for his action be it judiciary or administrative and situation will change.

Like (1)

Ajit Kumar L

Mar 12, 2015

While I agree with the main argument of the article -- there is a a lot mess to be sorted out, transmission of interest rates has another aspect to it too. Banks accept term deposit (which is a major portion of the deposits) with a committed interest rate, whereas the loans are mostly at rates which are linked to the Base Rate. So, the moment a Bank decides to bring down the Base Rate, the yield on loans comes down, whereas the cost of deposits remains static. That will have a big impact on the profitability.

Like (1)
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "The mess in public sector banks will not be easy to sort out". Click here!