Don't confuse a great company with a great stock

Mar 27, 2015

- By Vivek Kaul

Vivek Kaul
"Buy great companies," is a cliche one often hears from people who make a living out of peddling stock market tips. But what they don't bother to tell us is "how do you identify a great company?" And even if one has done that, does a great company always make for a great stock? Or is the timing of buying the stock equally important?

Gary Smith, answers a part of this question in his book Standard Deviations-Flawed Assumptions, Tortured Data and Other Ways to Lie With Statistics. He takes the example of an American company called Sears. It was dropped on November 1, 1999, from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Dow), which is one of America's premier stock market indices. Stocks which are a part of the Dow are supposed to be "substantial companies-renowned for the quality and wide acceptance of their products or services-with strong histories of successful growth."

Sears was one of America's biggest success stories. It sold everything from watches to toys and even ready to assemble houses. It had been a part of the Dow for 75 years before it was dropped. It was replaced by Home Depot.

So why was Sears dropped and replaced with Home Depot? "Sears...was struggling to compete with discount retailers like Walmart, Target and yes, Home Depot. Revenues and profits were falling, and Sears' stock price had dropped nearly 50 percent in 6 months. Home Depot on the other hand, was booming... and was opening a new store every 56 hours," writes Smith.

--- Advertisement ---
The Challenge Many Investors Face In The Stock Market...

We all know the stock market has immense potential to generate huge returns for investors.

However, one of the biggest challenges many investors face is finding good stocks that have the potential to generate such huge returns.

But we have some good news for you now.

We've been picking high-potential companies from a special segment for over 7 years now.

And some of our picks have given out returns such as 217% in 3 years and 11 months, 288% in 2 years and 5 months, 100% in just 1 year 8 months, and more.

And what's even better is that you too could get access to such companies and benefit from them immensely in the long run.

Just click herefor full details...
---------------------------

The question is if a stock is dropped from an index and replaced by another stock, which stock gives better returns in the days to come? The stock which is added to the index? Or the one which is dropped?

Common sense tells us that the stock which is added to the index is the one that should give us better returns. But that is not what happened in this case. Sears gave a return of 103% over the next five and a half years, before it was bought out by Kmart. On the other hand Home Depot lost 22%.

Interestingly, in 1999, four substitutions were made to the Dow-Home Depot, Microsoft, Intel and SBC. These stocks became a part of the Dow at the cost of Sears, Goodyear Tire, Union Carbide and Chevron. All the four stocks that became a part of the Dow were great companies. Nevertheless, they performed poorly over the next ten years.

An investment of $ 2,500 each in the four stocks that were added to the Dow would have been worth $6,604 ten years later. An investment of $2,500 each in the four stocks that were deleted from the Dow would have been worth $16,367 ten years later.

The basic point that comes out of this example is inherently simple. As Smith points out: "No matter how good the company, we need to know the stock's price before deciding whether it's an attractive investment."

Another great company that Smith talks about in his book is IBM. In 1978, the earnings of IBM had been growing at about 16 % per year (adjusted for inflation) for more than 50 years. A saying that was popular at that point of time was: "No purchasing manager ever got fired for buying IBM computers, and no portfolio manager ever got fired for buying IBM stock."

Given this, many portfolio managers recommended IBM stock in 1978 and predicted that its price would triple over the next ten years. Based on the earnings that the company made during the period 1968-1978, it was predicted that by 1988, the earning per share of IBM would be $18.50. The company achieved only half of that.

What went wrong? The analysts were simply projecting that IBM will continue to grow at the same rate as it had in the past, without realizing that it was simply not possible. As Smith points out: "If IBM kept growing at 16 percent annually and the overall US economy continued to grow at its long-run 3 percent, by 2003 half of US output would be IBM products and in 2008 everything would have been made by IBM."

This example also tells us that IBM may have been a great company in 1978, but it was no longer a great stock-at least not something on which you could earn fantastic returns. Log story short-the point of time at which an investor buys a stock is extremely important.

An excellent example in the Indian case is Infosys in the late 1990s. As Parag Parikh points out in his book Stocks to Riches: "The stock price [of Infosys] shot up from around Rs 2,000 (Rs 10 paid- up) in January 1999 to around Rs 12,000 (Rs 5 paid-up) in March 2000. Nothing spectacular had happened to the company to justify such a steep increase. But by the end of September 2000, the stock was down to Rs 7,000. Nothing had gone drastically wrong with the company either since March when it was quoted around Rs 12,000."

The analysts justified this increase by saying that Infosys was growing at the rate of 100%. What they did not tell the investors was that Infosys couldn't keep growing at such a rapid rate. As Parekh points out : "In the financial year 2000, Infosys reported revenues of Rs 882 crore. If we were to compound this figure at 85% annually for 10 years (as some people believed the growth would continue), then in 2010, Infosys would report revenues of a staggering Rs 4,14,176 crore. At that time, assuming a market capitalisation of 100 times revenues (similar to what Infosys was quoting at its peak), it would put Infosys' value at $9.2 trillion. The GDP of the US was around the same figure!" So, Infosys in 2000 was a great company. But it was clearly a bad investment.

The moral of the story at the end of the day being-don't confuse a great company with a great stock.

Name the great companies in the Indian stock market which presently do not make for a good investment? Post your comments or share your views in the Equitymaster Club.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

Using Deposits to Rescue Banks is a Bad Idea; It Needs to Be Nipped in the Bud December 11, 2017
The Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance(FRDI) Bill proposes to do just this.
5 Agents of Change Investors Need to Know About Now December 11, 2017
The world is changing fast right now in ways that many investors might not easily recognize or want to admit. If you're not paying attention, you could be letting opportunities pass you by without even realizing it.
Why Economists Are Morons December 9, 2017
Why are most modern economists such nincompoops? The quick answer: because it pays.
Bitcoin is the Best Offshore Bank Account December 8, 2017
The biggest advantage bitcoin has over offshore banks is that it's truly offshore. Not just off Britain's shores, but off every country's shores.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Don't confuse a great company with a great stock". Click here!

4 Responses to "Don't confuse a great company with a great stock"

Krishna

Mar 30, 2015

Nice article.....certainly articulate.....driven home the points nicely

Like 

Subhasish Banerjee

Mar 28, 2015

RELIANCE INDUSTRY, TATA STEEL, ITC,SUZLON ENERGY, THERE ARE MANY MORE COMPANIES HAVING BEST PRODUCTS AND HIGHER ASSETS BUT SHARE VALUE ARE NOT APPRECIATING. SO I AGREE WITH YOU AND THANKS FOR GIVING AWARENESS AMONG RETAIL CUSTOMERS INVEST OUR HARD EARNED MONEY AND AFTER LONG WAITING NO APPRECIATION IN VALUE

Like 

Rahul Mathur

Mar 27, 2015

The great Indian companies which presently do not make for a good investment: HUL,MARUTI SUZUKI, L&T and many more. But now market is correcting so there will be buying opportunities, but one should remember: "Price is what you pay and Value is what you get".

Like 

Anil Singhvi

Mar 27, 2015

Reliance Industries and ITC to name a couple

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Don't confuse a great company with a great stock". Click here!