What shaped US' credit driven economy? - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 10 April 2014
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
What shaped US' credit driven economy? A  A  A

Gualfin, Argentina

Today, we return to familiar territory. We have seen it before: The slowdown in the economy. The over-pricing of assets (particularly stocks). The huge increase in debt. The Feds' QE program.

But for all its familiarity, it remains strange...and mysterious.

Let's backtrack.

The foundation for today's peculiar economy was laid in the '60s and '70s. In 1968, America's money became - effectively - removed from gold. In 1971, foreign nations could no longer redeem their dollars for gold, making the dollar the world's monetary reserve. Thenceforth, the supply of money and credit was largely taken out of the invisible hands of a free economy, and given to Ph.D. economists working for the US central bank, the Fed.

These economists had a theory, one that seems childishly naive, yet nevertheless seems to work in practice, so far. The more you could get people to borrow, they reasoned, the more demand for goods and services...and the more the economy would produce...giving everyone more access to jobs, incomes, and the satisfaction of getting something for nothing. The theory maintained that as long as consumer prices didn't get out of control, more and more credit could be added, stimulating growth.

After some shilly-shallying around in the '70s, the new credit-driven economy began to take shape in the '80s. Since then, $33 trillion of spending, buying, investing, producing, consuming and speculating has taken place - funded entirely by additional credit. That is, if the level of debt/GDP had kept steady, there have been approximately $1 trillion per year less economic activity over the last 3 decades.

Advertisement
5 Potential Long Term Wealth Creators...

We have zeroed in on 5 Stocks which hold the potential to be big long-term wealth creators of your portfolio....

And full information on these 5 Blue Chips is available in our Special Report - Equitymaster's Top 5 for 2020.

We want you to access these stocks right away...

And that's why we are giving you an opportunity to claim a copy for Free.

How can you do that? So, Don't Delay and Just click here for full details...

Is that a success for the Ph.Ds? Or what?

"Or what?" is our guess and our question.

During almost that entire time, from 1980 to 2013, not only did consumer prices not get out of control, instead, they seemed to come more into control, with gradually falling CPI numbers (aided by jiving the figures!) from over 13% in 1980 to barely 1% today.

But here is the curious and incomprehensible part.

If you earned $100 a week, you could normally spend $100 a week. If you had $10 in savings...your savings would represent stored-up purchasing power. So you might choose, in one week, to spend that too. In that week, you would enjoy $110 worth of what the world had on offer. And the economy around you would enjoy an extra $10 worth of demand.

But the $33 trillion spent by Americans over the last 4 decades did not come from savings. Instead, it came out of the blue - from central banks and the banking system. It did not represent resources that had been set aside - like seed corn - to prime future growth. No one ever deprived himself of a single meal or as much as a single beer to save the money. No one troubled himself to work even a single hour to earn it. No one toiled or spun...

Now, if the guy with the saved $10 lent it to someone else...and the borrower spent it...it would have the same effect as if he had spent it himself. So, if the economy had borrowed $33 trillion from savings...and spent it...you'd see the same effect, right?

And what if the $10 or the $33 trillion couldn't be paid back? Then, the savings would be lost. The savers would be out. But at least it would make sense. The autos, shopping malls, vacations, retirements, silly gadgets, health care scams, parasitic legal actions, and false-shuffle financial products would have been funded by real money. They would exist for a reason, if not necessarily a good one.

But what happens if the $33 trillion of pure credit, unbacked by savings, cannot be repaid? Who is out? Who loses?

And how did all those real things...the $33 worth of goods and services ...come to exist in the first place, if there were no real money or resources ever made available to fund them?

Is anyone else concerned about this? Are we all alone here?

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "What shaped US' credit driven economy?". Click here!

3 Responses to "What shaped US' credit driven economy?"

Niraj

Apr 11, 2014

The point that we are missing out is that although the concept of economics are being applied to a country, since the US $ is the Reserve Currency, inflation will not result in the US till such time as other countries keep on supplying goods and services to USA and keep holding their Treasury Bonds. Therefore the inflation is actually being exported to these countries.

Like 

Om Prakash Sharma

Apr 11, 2014

Today as your FED operates it seems that Ph.D's are winning And AS you are left alone I am there to give you company

Like 

Lalit

Apr 10, 2014

When any money is lent, the borrower gets indebted to the lender to that extent. If he cannot repay, the lender has a right on the borrower. But here the lender i.e. The Fed, who is the lender to The US State i.e. its Citizens has built this right over a period of time. But The FED got this money by just printing the same i.e. out of thin air. So even without lending any real money the US FED is the creditor and The US citizens are the debtors. So the real beneficiary is The US Fed. Now who owns The Fed is the biggest question mark??? The share holders of The Fed are the private bankers like Goldman Sachs, Merril Lynch, BoFa etc and who owns these banks?? So in effect the owners of these banks are also the owners of The US Fed and they are the beneficiary of this Credit SYstem. Who are they?? Some say they are Rothschild family, Rockfeller family?? Now if this true then it is they who shaped US' credit driven economy. Can you answer this question?? Than your question is also answered.

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "What shaped US' credit driven economy?". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Deep State First
August 23, 2017
Nowhere was the darkness deeper than in the nation's capital. There, no light shone. No flicker of awareness...observation...learning...or reflection appeared.
A Darkness Is Spreading Across the US
August 22, 2017
Today, we are attacked by one preposterous thing after another, each of them even more absurd than the last.
Dear PM Modi, India is Already Land of Self-Employed, and It Ain't Working
August 21, 2017
Most Indians who cannot find jobs, look at becoming self-employed.
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.