The currency advanced 0.36 percent to 6.802 per dollar as of 1:45 p.m. in Hong Kong, the biggest gain since Oct. 7, 2008, according to the China Foreign Exchange Trading System. The 12- month non-deliverable yuan forward rose 1.4 percent to 6.6209, implying traders are betting on a 2.7 percent appreciation.What, not even a 1% move?
Our guess is that China has just stolen a march on its US critics. The currency move didn't make any real difference. And by agreeing to end the peg, the fickle finger of blame now turns from the East to the West.
The complaint against China was that it was under-pricing its output, by keeping the yuan tied to the dollar. America was China's number one customer. It made sense to keep the two currencies in line. But since China is a more efficient producer, it also caused US companies to lose market share to
Chinese competitors or to shift their own production to Chinese subcontractors.
The best solution to that problem was just to ignore it. But US lawmakers needed a scapegoat and China was the best they could do.
But what are they going to do now? Who to blame? They could try "bourgeoisie parasites," like Hugo Chavez, (more below.) But Marxist mumbo jumbo never caught on in the US. Too many voters wanted to be bourgeois!
While China might have under-priced its output, the US certainly overpriced its ability to consume all that Made-In-China stuff.
"It's just bad economics to pretend we can fix the lives of middle class American workers by getting the Chinese to revalue its currency vis-a-vis the dollar -- it's a horrible misconception," Stephen Roach, chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd. said in a June 15 radio interview from Hong Kong with Tom Keene on Bloomberg Surveillance.But don't worry, dear reader. This is a problem that takes care of itself.
"Bill, you've been talking about a Great Correction for months. I don't disbelieve you, but what the hell is a Great Correction?"
A Great Correction is what you get when a great many things need to be corrected at the same time. When the crisis of '07-'09 came, economists immediately began talking about a 'recovery.' But there was no way the economy could go back to being what it had been. What it had been was excessive, over-the-top and unsustainable. It couldn't go back. It had to go forward.
Specifically, it had to correct the many mistakes made by Americans who spent too much...and Chinese who made too much stuff for them to buy. On the Chinese side, that correction will take time. But it's not a major change of direction. There is now more consuming going on in the emerging markets than there is in the US. GM sells more cars in China than it does in North America. And Coke says it's profits went up the first quarter, even though it's North American sales went down.
China will have to adjust its product mix and its marketing/distribution system. But there is no theoretical reason it can't continue doing what it does best - making things. China's economy can recover (it just needs something to recover from!)
The bigger problem is on the US side, where no recovery is possible. Many people have houses they can't afford - even after the price of housing was cut by around 20%. Many banks have more debt than credit, even after dozens of them have been knocked out of business. The big banks have still not been corrected. Their mistakes went into the Federal Reserve's vault. So that is another thing that remains to be corrected.
At the household level, people have generally spent too much money. They had no savings...even as they were getting closer and closer to retirement. That situation has begun - but only begun - to correct itself. Savings rates are rising, while a good deal of debt has been cancelled, written off, or restructured.
Of course, there were many, many more mistakes - from private equity deals to commodity prices to over-employment in the retail sector. Most of them are being corrected.
If that were all there were to it, it would be an important correction, but not a Great Correction. As we keep saying, private industry and private initiative can make mistakes. But if you really want to make a mess of things you need taxpayers support.
Of course, the taxpayers were in on this from the get-go. The feds largely created the bubble in the housing market bubble. And then, when the bubble blew up, they took over Fannie and Freddie...stuck the taxpayers with trillions more in liabilities...and generally made things worse.
But there are couple of things, specifically, that make us think this correction will be worthy of the Great modifier.
First, it appears to mark the end of a 60-year credit expansion. That alone ought to make for an interesting correction.
Second, it also appears to signal the high water market for the USA. America may be on top of the world for a while longer; but other countries are growing much faster so that, relatively, the US will never be in such a superior position again.
The third thing to be corrected is the most interesting of all. The US-dollar based money system, created in '71, is surely building up for some kind of correction.
While the private sector generally tries to correct its problems, the public sector adds to its own. It is living beyond its means. Sooner or later, it will need to be corrected too.
When will it happen? When the bond market is ready.
Already, in Europe, bond buyers forced the issue. Governments have begun to address the problem of excess public deficits. At least people are talking about it...and governments are promising cutbacks.
"We're all austerians now," says Martin Wolf, reprising the language that got us into the mess in the first place. (Richard Nixon once famously remarked that 'we're all Keynesians now," referring to the widespread belief that government needs to meet downturns with counter-cyclical stimulus spending.)
Yes, dear reader, austerity is in style in Europe this summer. But not in the US. Which makes us think that investors are making a big mistake by buying dollar bonds. Dollar bonds are the investor's choice because the US, and only the US, is ready, willing and able to print as many dollars as it needs.
Which is what worries us...
*** A bad zombie movie...
Anyone who wants to vote probably shouldn't be allowed to vote. Voting is the first step towards zombification - trying to get something without actually working for it. People who can't get what they want by honest trade or innocent persuasion turn to the ballet box. The next thing you know they're voting for Hugo Chavez.
And look what happens! Want to see what zombies do to an economy? Look at Venezuela. Reuters reports:
"Mountains of rotting food found at a government warehouse, soaring prices and soldiers raiding wholesalers accused of hoarding: Food supply is the latest battle in President Hugo Chavez's socialist revolution.
"Venezuelan army soldiers swept through the working class, pro-Chavez neighborhood of Catia in Caracas last week, seizing 120 tons of rice along with coffee and powdered milk that officials said was to be sold above regulated prices.
"The battle for food is a matter of national security," said a red-shirted official from the Food Ministry, resting his arm on a pallet laden with bags of coffee.
"It is also the latest issue to divide the Latin American country where Chavez has nationalized a wide swathe of the economy, he says to reverse years of exploitation of the poor.
"Chavez supporters are grateful for a network of cheap state-run supermarkets and they say the raids will slow massive inflation.
"They are not going to stop us in the plan, which is to give the people what is their right," Chavez said Friday during the inauguration of a supermarket chain the government bought this year from French retailer Casino.
"Food prices are up 41 percent in the last 12 months during a deep recession, government figures show, despite the government's growing network of state-run supermarkets that sell at discounts of up to 40 percent and are popular with his poor supporters.
"South America's top oil exporter, Venezuela imports about 70 percent of its food and analysts say the economic hardships could give the opposition a boost at the ballot box-although most expect Chavez to retain a reduced parliamentary majority.
"Fighting back, Chavez says he is in an economic war against the "parasitic bourgeoisie" that tries to convince Venezuelans that socialism does not work by twisting facts and taking advantage of honest mistakes."
This is typical zombie talk. The bourgeoisie is, of course, the most productive part of a society. These are people who work...who make things...who run shops and industries. So Chavez calls them 'parasitic'...as he takes away their food!
Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.