Rapid growth may be a thing of the past - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 11 July 2013
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
Rapid growth may be a thing of the past A  A  A

Normandy, France

Not much in the markets today to draw our attention.

Then, whither our thoughts? How about to the end of the world as we have known it? This from the Wall Street Journal:

    That HSBC group chief economist Stephen King shares a name with a famous writer of scary stories is a coincidence that he may tire of hearing.

    But it's fair to say that with his latest book, When the Money Runs Out: The End of Western Affluence, he is dabbling in the financial equivalent of the horror genre. Perhaps even scarier, his is the stuff of nonfiction.

    Mr. King's thesis - outlined in an interview at The Wall Street Journal - is that we in the West are in line for a shock when we discover that the high-growth rates to which we're accustomed aren't coming back. In the U.S., we've been wrongly budgeting for a return to 3.5% average real growth rates that persisted through the second half of the 20th century - an affliction suffered by both policymakers and households that he calls an "optimism bias" - and yet even before the financial crisis destroyed trillions of dollars of wealth the economy was only clocking gains of 2.5% per year.

    Forget worrying about the post-crisis onset of a Japan-style "lost decade," Mr. King says. "We have been through a lost decade already."

    Among the reasons for this long-term shift to a slower potential growth rate, he cites the exhaustion of various one-off productivity gains that boosted growth after World War II: the entry of women into the workforce; the liberalization of world trade; a tripling in rates of consumer credit founded on an unsustainable increase in housing prices; and education. These gains are no longer to be had, he says, but policymakers are blind to that fact and so are burdening the economies of the U.S., Europe and Japan with long-term debts.
Is that so? Probably. No one knows what the future has in store, but a wise man hopes for the best and prepares for the worst. Slower rates of growth are not the worst thing the future can send our way...but they pose a big challenge.

--------------------------- All New 5-Yr Data Factsheets On Leading Indian Companies ---------------------------

You asked. We delivered!

Presenting our all-new Company Factsheet pages, with 5-Yr data and analysis! Plus a much more user-friendly format, with charts showing important long term trends including sales and profits.

Click here to view the all new Infosys Factsheet...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


For most of our lives, economic growth has been a given. We depended on it to bring us more stuff. More jobs. More government spending. And to make us richer.

The WSJ article does not mention two other reasons rapid economic growth may be a thing of the past, not the future. One has been discussed here. The other is obvious.

As to the first, almost everything in nature is subject to the law of declining marginal utility. You get one ice-cream sundae for dessert. You like it. You get another, and probably get less satisfaction from it. The third begins to make you sick. Likewise, by the 1970s, mature economies - Europe, America, and Japan - were already reaching the point of declining marginal in energy. They still liked it. But they weren't getting the sugar high that it used to give them.

In addition to the factors mentioned by the WSJ above, it was fossil fuels that gave the developed economies such a big leap forward in the post-war years. Energy use went up; GDP growth rose too. But then, in the '80s and '90s, energy use began to level off, and even fall - especially in Europe. GDP growth rates declined as well. Because the return on energy investments no longer paid off the way they had before. People already had automobiles, trucks, machines, appliances - all the paraphernalia of modern life. They could get little real growth by adding more.

That's why the shale oil/fracking discoveries in the US are important to the energy industry, but probably not for the rest of the economy. America never lacked energy; it just can't use more of it effectively.

As to the second missing issue - demography - we won't be the first to notice that the social welfare systems of all mature democracies depend on growth. One generation - richer and more numerous than the one before it - has to pay the cost of supporting parents. Health care and pensions have become the number one items on government budgets...and the most resistant to cuts.

Those systems, private and public (they include corporate health and pension plans as well as national ones) are now threatened by declining birth rates, resulting in what Ed Hadas calls "zombie economics:"
    Get used to zombie economics

    Zombies are neither really alive nor fully dead. Moviegoers know that, but the idea is also useful in demographics and economics. Although economic zombification receives little attention, its effects could be as important as monetary policy, fiscal deficits and structural reforms.

    The demographic trends are well known. For the past three or four decades in most developed economies, the number of children born has been too low, often by a wide margin, to keep the population constant. Japan is the leader in this decline. Indeed, the zombification of the Japanese population could well be the most dramatic such shift in history, at least during a period of peace, prosperity and good health.

    Of course, Tokyo and Osaka are not actually filled with walking, flesh-eating corpses. But as in a horror film, the nation's life-force is waning. Over the last decade, the number of Japanese people aged between 20 and 25 years old has declined by 22 percent. Since there is almost no immigration, the demographic future is easy to predict: another 22 percent drop over the next 20 years.

    By comparison, the euro zone decline looks modest: a 5 percent fall in the size of the 20 to 25 age group in the past decade. Some parts of Europe have relatively high birth rates, and immigration keeps the numbers up. Still, the region overall can look forward to almost certain demographic decay.
The United States has resisted the zombie curse. The number of 20 to 25 year olds is 12 percent higher now than a decade ago. A dip is likely in the next few years, thanks to the lingering effect of the sharp decline in family size after the post-World War Two baby boom. But thereafter, the native-born young population should stay almost stable. With immigration, it will probably keep rising, although more slowly than in the past.
    Economic zombification does not necessarily make people poorer. Wealth depends on the productivity of the economy, not the number of people or their ages. But it does have consequences.

    The most obvious is much slower recorded GDP growth. The decline is larger than simple comparisons of total populations or workforces would suggest. In zombification, the young people who would join the economy if the birth rate were at or above the replacement level go missing. It is a significant gap, because young adults start new households.

    Household formation requires a lot more than clothes and bedding. In developed economies, new families need houses, cars and the other infrastructure which makes modern life so comfortable: power stations, cables, roads, computer servers and airports.

    Infrastructure requires capital investment, so family-starters are the most GDP-intensive portion of the population.
We wish Mr. Hadas had not used the term 'zombies' to describe slow-growing economies. Zombification, properly used, refers to the way in which, over time, more and more people figure out how to get something for nothing. People become 'educators,' and never teach a single student. They go on 'disability.' They turn whole industries - defense, health, finance - into vast wealth transfer schemes that produce little or no net benefit for the people they are supposed to serve. In short, zombies consume more than they produce; they are a net-negative for society.

But Mr. Hadas is right about the effects of lower birthrates. They also lower 'growth.' And without substantial growth, life as we have known it will come to an end. Stocks will be fall, creditors (bondholders, for example) won't be paid, and governments must cut back on their expenses...or go broke.

Trouble is, the people whose benefits would have to be cut are also the voters. The zombies are now in control ...of the major industries...and of the government itself. What will happen when the government can no longer give the zombies what it has promised them?

Plato guessed. From Classical Wisdom Weekly:
    In book VIII of The Republic... democratic leaders will realize that they are only easily supported when there is a war that the people can rally behind. And so the democratic leaders will unnecessarily become involved in violent affairs, creating wars to distract the people. To ensure their power, the leaders will create laws to bolster their position. The rulers will impose heavy taxes against the commoners to ensure they are unable or unwilling to fight back... And any who do oppose the leaders will be labeled as an enemy and persecuted as a spy.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Rapid growth may be a thing of the past". Click here!

2 Responses to "Rapid growth may be a thing of the past"

LOVEPAREEK

Jul 12, 2013

GLAD 2 C THE RETURN OF ZOMBIES.......IT WAS LIKE, LOOOONG TIME, NO ZOMBIES.

Like 

LOVEPAREEK

Jul 12, 2013

DEAR BILL.
ALL OF THAT U AV WRTTN MAKES ENUFF SENSE, AND ONCE AGAIN ITS A GREAT WRITEUP AS USUAL. BUT U HAVE TO CONCEDE THAT "the exhaustion of various one-off productivity gains that boosted growth after World War II" HAS BEEN OFFSET BY THE RECENT DISCOVERY OF FRACKING & SHALE OIL. THAT COMES AS A GREAT BOOSTER FOR THE DYING SOUL, AND ONCE AGAIN THE PARASITE IS NOURISHED ENOUGH TO START CORRUPTING THE WORLD

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Rapid growth may be a thing of the past". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.