How did the rich get so rich? - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 16 July 2012
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
How did the rich get so rich? A  A  A

Madrid, Spain

The Daily Reckoning...proved right again!

We've been sticking our necks out. We had a strong hunch that the rich had gotten a whole lot richer not because they were suddenly greedier or suddenly smarter, but because of the feds. The feds were handing out money. The rich were first in line.

But we didn't have any real proof...until now.

Relatively speaking, the rich have gotten a lot richer over the last 30 years. The whiners and fixers want to do something about it. They say the rich weren't taxed heavily enough...and they weren't regulated enough.

That had little to do with it, we pointed out. Instead, the meddlers themselves caused the caused the rich to get richer.

------------------------------- Coming Soon - A Wealth Radar System -------------------------------

We are developing a Wealth Radar System that can detect market movements early so you can zero in on profit-making opportunities. It's Top Secret right now, but if you want to be the first to know about it, just click here...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Who's right? We are, of course...

A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York suggests that the bulk of equity returns for more than a decade are due to actions by the US central bank. Theoretically, the S&P 500 would be more than 50 percent lower-at the 600 level-if the bullish price action preceding Fed announcements was excluded, the study showed. Posted on the New York Fed's web site Wednesday, the study sought out to explain AP why equities receive such a high premium over less risky assets such as bonds. What they found was that the Federal Reserve has had an outsized impact on equities relative to other asset classes. For example, the market has a tendency to rise in the 24-hour period before the release of the Fed's statement on interest rates and the economy, presumably on expectations Chairman Ben Bernanke and his predecessor, Alan Greenspan, would discuss or implement a stimulus measure to lift asset prices. - CNBC

How do you like that? Without the intervention of the central bankers, the rich would be about $7.5 trillion less rich. But wait...actually, they'd be even less rich than that. We'll come back to that, tomorrow....

Let's look at how the rich got so rich. Did they get a lot smarter in the last 30 years. Did they become a lot greedier? Nah...they were in the right place at the right time. They owned stocks just when the Fed was dumping beaucoup money into the financial system.

We didn't have much proof for these assertions when we first made them. They just seemed, superficially, correct. The Fed increased the money supply (M2) 13 times since the early '80s...and the Dow rose about 13 times too. It seemed a little fishy to us.

Wages and prices, meanwhile, were held in check by outsourcing. The US outsourced its consumer and labor inflation to China. So relatively, the rich got richer...leaving the tired, poor multitudes to get even poorer.

And now we have proof. Without the intervention of the central bank stocks would by at half today's prices.

One scam after another. It is amazing anyone takes economists or central bankers seriously. And now the same bumblers who caused the rich to get so rich are still on the job...offering more scammy solutions. Here's the Atlantic Magazine:

...in one of the most famous passages from the Federalist Papers (No.51). James Madison wrote: "If men were angels, no government would be necessary."

...the issue [is] how to realize the benefits of market capitalism while restraining the powerful impulses to cut corners, cheat, and commit fraud. This ageless question is of special moment in this polarized political season, in which the role of government is central. The cases rebut the assertions of the Republicans, Tea Partyers, libertarians, and corporate leaders who wish to reduce the reach of law and government and who believe that markets will always self-regulate -- people from Ayn Rand and Russell Kirk, to Ron Paul and Grover Norquist, to Tea-Party Republican majorities in the House who want to "starve government," to individual and corporate donors to super PACs, all of whom are today shaping the Republican message.

The cases support people who believe in a mixed economy that gives a central role to economic freedom and free markets -- but a system that also places important legal and regulatory limits in order to prevent corruption and protect social goods.

Get it? Businessmen and investors aren't angels. So government regulators...backed by economists...and opinion leaders...have to step in.

And here's Jeffrey Sachs calling for major new central planning...

In short, we need new economic strategies to overhaul broken systems of finance, labour markets, taxation, ecological management, budget management and investment incentives. Those challenges cannot be fixed through lowering taxes on the rich or higher fiscal deficits to create aggregate demand. The new approaches must be long-term, structural, sensitive to inequalities of skills and education, aligned with the need for more sustainable technologies and "smarter" infrastructure (empowered by information technology) and congruent with long-term demographic trends. It's time we moved beyond the Republican Party economics of the 1920s and the Democratic Party economics of the 1930s, to a new macroeconomics for the 21st century.

Never explained is how people on the public payroll got to be such angels...and so smart! If you cut them, do they not bleed? If you insult them, aren't their feelings hurt? If you wave a $100 bill in front of them, won't they do your bidding?

Bob Diamond hoped so. Moyers and Winship report:

...the disgraced financier would no longer be hosting one of two Romney fundraising events for American expatriates being held in London later this month. But no worries. The Boston Globe notes that "still among those hosting the events is Patrick Durkin, a registered lobbyist for Barclays... Durkin, who has been a top Romney bundler, is one of seven chairs for the reception and among the 13 co-chairs for the dinner.

"Others involved in hosting the events are Dwight Poler, managing director at the European branch of Bain Capital, the firm Romney founded; Raj Bhattacharyya, managing director at Deutsche Bank; and Dan Bricken, a managing director at Wells Fargo Securities. " Each guest at the dinner event will pay between $25,000 and $75,000 for the opportunity to sup with the Republican presidential nominee..."

More tomorrow...on the whole corrupt and degenerate spectacle. How the feds rigged the system...and how they use the crisis they caused to rig it even more.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "How did the rich get so rich?". Click here!

3 Responses to "How did the rich get so rich?"

NVS

Jul 18, 2012

In the modern world a person's worth is measured by the money, status and power wielded and not by character and service rendered to Society by him/her. So long as this value system remains and greed is good philosophy prevails, people trying to get richer by fair or foul means will continue.

In India, the ruling class actually collude with rich to help themselves rich and more powerful and the aam admi is needed only for his votes. Otherwise he/she is not in the scheme of things at all. In his name the nation is getting looted.

Like 

MAHARAJ SINGH

Jul 17, 2012

A critical analysis of failure of Capitalist system is welcome as a sigh of relief but the failure of socialists is equally heartening to those who believe in a value based economy and governance. Ultimately what will survive is a pure naturalistic system of economy and governance derived from scriptures like Gita and theory of Karma.

Like (1)

Dr. V.Narendran

Jul 16, 2012

Rich becoming richer by fair means is ok. But rich becoming richer through unfair means is very serious in a progressive society. Unfortunately, majority of rich people in India are corrupt. Their master mind to exploit every situation through unfair means for their unreasonable wealth creation is the main roadblock for India's development....The middlemen exploit grassroot level people in India who are struggling for their living....

Like (2)
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "How did the rich get so rich?". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Dear PM Modi, India is Already Land of Self-Employed, and It Ain't Working
August 21, 2017
Most Indians who cannot find jobs, look at becoming self-employed.
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...