------------------------- The Right Way to Make Big Returns from Small Cap Stocks... -------------------------
There was a time when small cap stocks used to be known for "quick" returns.
People would put as much money as they could into small cap stocks that were on the up, and cash out in a few days with a good sizable profit to show for it.
Unfortunately, things are not so simple anymore.
If you really want to make the BIG returns that only small caps are capable of giving today... without worrying about the frequent market movements... then our Hidden Treasure service can help you do it.
And for a limited time, you can try this service for Rs 499 only!
Click here for full details...
Yet, the subject of the AlphaNow comment is something we all know about...money. It's something we all understand. Or, we think we do. But this is a particular kind of money - credit-based money. It is money that isn't always what it seems. Our brains are not sure what this credit-based money is all about...what it's worth...how it gets its value...what it will be worth in the future...or when it will be totally worthless.
Our awakening to money began about a week ago when we picked up David Graeber's book, "Debt, the first 5,000 years." Mr. Graeber is an anthropologist and a historian. He is very clever. He sets out with a new perspective - not the familiar cliches of an economist or speculator. And he adds the penetrating insights of a sharp man with an axe to grind. Like the rest of us, of course, he can be bright. But sometimes he mis-places his thinking cap.
Like so many historians, he often takes himself far too seriously. More than once he makes the biggest mistake you can make in historical analysis: post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Just because A happened after B, it doesn't mean B caused A.
Connecting this thought to the AlphaNow comment above, interest rates may go up...or may not. Either way, the central bankers may or may not be responsible for them. Who the hell knows?
Often, Mr. Graeber thinks he knows more than he really does. If he had chosen a different career path, he could be a central banker. He believes he can know unknowable things. And he is willing to believe things that aren't true. What's more, he has a remarkable faith in the ability of bureaucrats and politicians to do what can't be done by anyone. But his book - which we strongly recommend - helped us to catch a glimpse of something he missed.
Graeber notes that the origin of money was probably not as Adam Smith and other early economists imagined. They thought they saw primitive man bartering corn for pelts...or arrow heads for women....and then realizing that 'money' would make the transactions easier. If you didn't happen to have what the other person wanted you could still do business, accepting 'money' as a place-holder and then completing the exchange with someone else who actually had what you wanted. Money caught on like the internal combustion engine or like the internet - because it made life easier and more efficient.
Not so, says Graeber. Governments invented money to pay mercenaries and support armies in distant locations. This may or may not be true. To us, it makes sense that money arose where it was needed. And, if the anthropological research Graeber cites is correct, money was probably not needed in primitive, tribal settings.
In a small community, money is not necessary. Markets, as we know them, do not exist in small, primitive communities. The exchange of goods and services was not a matter of simple rational calculation. Instead, exchanges were an integral part of social, cultural, religious and community life. People gave gifts. They 'paid' for brides. They traded favors. Or, they practiced a form of archaic communism, each providing what he can...others taking what they need, infinitely nuanced by the particular beliefs and prejudices of the people involved. To the extent they were keeping score, individuals remembered who owed what to whom...and wove complex webs of debt that stretched over many generations.
But while this form of organization - though endlessly elaborated over thousands of years - is suited to small groups, it won't work for large ones. Humans are well adapted - over thousands of years -- to certain activities. They can throw a stone or drive a car. No problem. In small groups they can also organize themselves and solve problems. But the evolutionary adaptations that make humans suited to problem solving in small communities cause them to make a mess of problem solving on a large scale. This is as true of money...as it is of war and social welfare programs.
A stockbroker in New York eats fresh figs for breakfast. He doesn't know who grew them, who shipped them, or even who owns the store where he bought them. He walks around in shoes made in Italy...surely he has a debt to the cobbler. Should he send him a stock tip? Should he offer to trade his portfolio for free? Should he offer him his wife? And what about the mason in Queens who built his chimney? Or the assembly line worker in Malaysia who put together his I-pad?
It would be impossible for him to maintain a recollection of all the obligations he owes these people...even if he knew who they were. What can he do?
More on that tomorrow...
But before we leave you...consider this. A headline from the Financial Times:
"Geithner joins after-dinner top table with $400,000 for three speeches."
Without modern money, Geithner's speech might bring him two goats and one ugly daughter. Instead, today, his payoff for bailing out the banks (with other peoples' money) is more of other peoples' money. From the banks, of course. Deutsche Bank alone gave him $200,000 - according to the FT. Blackstone and Warburg Pincus each ponied up as much as $100,000 more.
Let's see, a few speeches. A few consulting gigs. A seat on a board of directors. Maybe fees for lobbying Congress or the administration. And heck, why not a partnership in a private equity firm? Hey...don't worry about Tim Geithner! The zombies will take care of him; he's one of their own.
Geithner gave the bankers trillions - in cash and guarantees. He helped make it possible for them to earn extravagant fees, commissions and bonuses when the going was good. Then, when their reckless wagers blew up and the going turned bad...he and the Fed dug them out of the rubble and put their losses onto the public.
None of this would have been possible without money. But it was a specific kind of money that enabled the banks to make a fortune in the first place and Tim Geithner to protect their ill-gotten gains in the second.
Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.