More intervention, but no real recovery - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 6 August 2012
More intervention, but no real recovery A  A  A

Paris, France

"Deja vu" is a French expression that means...well, you know what it means.

For our purposes, we will use it to refer to the slumpy economy...and to the feds' response. We've see it all before.

"Dans la merde" is another French expression...which refers to where you end up when the feds' undertake to fix it.

But the Dow shot up 217 points on Friday. Gold went up $18. How to explain it?

-------------------------- Asad Dossani's Secret "Wealth Radar System" Revealed! --------------------------

Make The Right Trade. At The Right Time. At The Right Price. View Now!


With Europe on the brink of a blow-up (where it's been for years)...China's economy slowing down dangerously...and much of the rest of the world already in recession you'd expect investors would think twice before buying more stocks. After all, what are stocks? They're shares in real businesses. When those businesses do well, the shareholders should do well. But businesses don't usually do well in a recession.

Investors, however, seem to be following a different line of thinking. They are responding to two entirely different hypotheses.
  1. The economy is doing well. That was the news in the latest unemployment report. Therefore it makes sense to own stocks and gold. As the economy improves, more people will borrow and spend. As they do so, interest rates and consumer prices will rise. Businesses will do better as their sales rise. Higher inflation rates will cause gold to go up, too.

  2. The economy is not doing well. And the worse it does the more pressure builds on central bankers to 'do something.' What can they do? Only add more cash and credit. More liquidity will send both stocks and gold up.

Now, you will look at these two hypotheses and think you have discovered a sure thing, no? A can't-lose proposition, right? Either the economy is doing well. Or not. Either way, stocks are going up!


How about a third hypothesis? In this one, the whole world is sliding into recession. Britain and Europe are already there. Japan is almost there. The US is trailing, but not by much.

Recession is what should happen. The developed economies are still in a Great Correction. And the effects of massive doses of new credit...cheaper money...and a big increase in the world's money supply (central bank assets have doubled since '08)...are wearing off. Once again, the private sector is trying to correct its mistakes -- shucking off bad debt however it can. People are being more careful with their money - which is why sales fall and unemployment rises.

Nothing new about this either.

And nothing really new about the feds' reaction. Murray Rothbard described the feds' response after the crash of '29:

"If the Federal Reserve had an inflationist attitude during the boom, it was just as ready to try to cure the depression by inflating further. It stepped in immediately to expand credit and bolster shaky financial position. In an act unprecedented in its history [but repeated after '08..] the Federal Reserve moved in during the week of the crash...the final week of October...and in that brief period added almost $300 million to the reserves of the nation's banks. During that week the Federal Reserve doubled its holding of government securities..."

Then, as now, the big increase in money supply produced something that looked like a recovery. Rothbard continues:

By mid-November, the great stock break was over, and the market, falsely stimulated by artificial credit, began to move upwards again.

In our current episode, stocks have recovered from their '08-'09 crash. Banks, teetering on the brink of collapse, were saved too - as the feds let it be known that they would do 'whatever it takes' to spare them from the consequences of their own mistakes.

And the leaders of the rescue, mainly Ben Bernanke himself, are hailed as heroes...having saved civilization. The 1930s had its heroes too. The first was Mr. Herbert Hoover, who had engineered rescue efforts following the Great Crash. Rothbard:

President Hoover was proud of his experiment in cheap money and in his speech to the business conference on December 5, he hailed the nation's good fortune in possessing the splendid Federal Reserve System, which had succeeded in saving shaky banks, had restored confidence, and had made capital more abundant by reducing interest rates.

We know, however, that heroes of the '30s had not really saved the financial system from a day of reckoning; they merely postponed it...and stretched it out.

The crash and depression of '20-'21 was more severe than the current crisis, but it was over within 24 months, during which time the feds made no rescue attempts. The washout after October 1929 probably would have been a short and violent too. Instead, the feds came to the rescue and turned it into a 20-year period which included a Great Depression and WWII.

That's our third hypothesis: deja vu all over again, with more intervention, but no real recovery. Instead, the day of reckoning will be pushed into the future...and the whole correction process will be turned into a long, painful episode of little growth, high unemployment and periodic financial crises.

And here's an additional forecast: Ben Bernanke will not want to re-live the '30s. He will not want that deja-vu experience. When the US economy is 'dans la merde,' he will give it more cash and that it is even further 'dans la merde!'

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "More intervention, but no real recovery". Click here!

2 Responses to "More intervention, but no real recovery"


Aug 12, 2012

On the ultimate day of reckoning for US (and for some other economies too) the country will close down all businesses except one: PRINTING CURRENCY NOTES.

All due to the reckless approach of the bankers and politicians who look at nothing beyond fooling the people for personal aggrandisement. The bankers want to show that they have prevented a recession (temporarily). The politicians want electoral victory in the next elections. None have the guts to face reality.


abanindra nath das

Aug 7, 2012

From the history of financial crisis we can learn that if we take measures to give the economy a lift we only hinder the natural process of corrections.At the time of crisis the economy should be left with itself so that it can proced with its own pace of recovery.Efforts from any quarter either government or corporate will only make the situation more worse and it only prolongs our sufferings.When economic situation s are good, does that reflect sound health of economy?With every boom fear of deep fall larks behind.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "More intervention, but no real recovery". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.