The juice is in 'security' - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 30 August 2012
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
The juice is in 'security' A  A  A

Ouzilly, France

Go Isaac, Go! Blow ye winds... Crack ye thunder... Oh ye gods...send a hail of rain...send a wall of wind...send a tide of water that washes the Republicans out of the Florida swamps... And drives the Democrats out of the hill country in the Carolinas...

There was little action in the markets again yesterday. Stocks barely moved. Gold lost $6.

Everyone is waiting. They want to know what will happen when the Fed gets together tomorrow. Will there be an open-ended commitment to QE - as much as you want, when you want it - or will there be nothing at all?

---------------------------- Only 2 days remain for you to grab your Rs 5,000 Bonus! ----------------------------

Now 2 days remain for you to grab Equitymaster's Wealth Alliance along with the Rs 5,000 bonus we promised. This offer will close at 11.59 PM tomorrow... and then remain closed for a pretty long time.

Like I said, the last time we opened Equitymaster's Wealth Alliance to new subscribers was 10 months ago! And this is the first time we are offering a bonus as big as Rs 5,000 too.So this is really one of those rare deals from our side.

Sure, I understand that the joining fee might feel a little steep. But once you join, you'll only have to pay Rs 950 a year for life for 4 of our services that'd normally cost Rs 25,000 a year. Plus, there's also a 30-day, full refund cover on Equitymaster's Wealth Alliance in case it's not to your liking.

So why miss out on this amazing opportunity?Just sign up and give Equitymaster's Wealth Alliance try. You may not get another chance to do so anytime soon. And I really mean this!

Click here to find out full details.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


While we are waiting....we will turn our attention from economics to politics, which is to say, from fraud to outright theft. There's an election campaign underway.

It was Ambrose Bierce, in his Devil's Dictionary, who called an election 'an advance auction of stolen goods.' Well, in the 2012 campaign...prices are rising. Bloomberg:

Donors Invest Millions in Romney for Billions in Returns

Wealthy donors and corporations are more heavily invested in this presidential election than at any time since the 1972 Watergate scandal led to stricter campaign- finance laws.

A series of court decisions and regulatory changes in 2010 unraveled federal limits on donations, paving the way for a return of the big players. They are pooling their money in nonprofits, which keep contributor names secret, and super- political action committees, which amassed $350 million through the end of July.

Bloomberg suggests that Sheldon Adelson, the Koch Bros., and others are 'investing' in presidential hopefuls with the expectation of a fat return on their investment if their man wins.

Well...frankly...we're shocked....SHOCKED!

Does Bloomberg really mean to say that people would actually stoop to using the political process to get what they want for themselves? That they would actually try to figure out which candidate would be better for their own interests...and then invest their time and money trying to get that fellow into office?

Hey, Bloomberg...get over it. The rich do it. The poor do it. Even folks in Lahore do it.

People always seem to do what comes naturally. Can't stop 'em. Why try?

And the more there is at stake in an auction, naturally, the higher prices will go. Ideally, the only things up for grabs in an election will be a few privileged parking places and the color of the flag. Then, people can bribe each other, cajole and lie as much as they want. Who cares? But when 41% of the US economy is at play, you gotta expect that people are going to pull out all the stops to have the winning bid.

And nowhere is the bidding more fast and more furious than in 'security' spending. Why? That's where the juice is.

"Ike was Right!" writes our friend "Tom Paine:"

It's an old story: the few take advantage of the many. In the name of making the world better or safer, elites capture the government and end up killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

The United States is no exception.

Dwight Eisenhower, who had spent his entire life in the military...and then, in government...issued a warning: Upon leaving the presidency, he said farewell. And watch out for the 'military industry complex,' he added.

Eisenhower knew that the combination of profit motive and power motive is hard to stop.

At the opening of WWII, the US had nothing to fear from its own security industry. Where the Nazis devoted 23% of GDP to their war industries in 1939, the US spent only 2%. Its army was smaller than Romania's.

But WWII was good for the US military. In a matter of weeks, the orders came to US manufacturers...and the weapons began rolling off assembly lines. Even before it entered the war itself, American industry was producing more tanks, planes, guns and ammunition than anyone. Roosevelt, coming to the aid of the English, pledged to manufacture 50,000 airplanes in a single year - which seemed almost delusional at the time.

US supplies - made in US factories by US workers - were indispensable.

After the war, the soldiers came home and the factories switched to making washing machines and automobiles. War debt declined as the economy grew. The military industrial complex never gave up its grip on power and money, however. Korea, the Cold War, and Vietnam provided cover for continued high levels of 'security' spending.

And then, with the bombing of the World Trade towers in 2001, the industry was able to greatly improve its position. Fully loaded, the cost of 'security' is now about $1.2 trillion. That includes wars, Homeland Security, fortified embassies, military aid...and all the other things that help keep the US Empire in business. Much of the domestic manufacturing base that helped win WWII has been exported to China and other countries, but the US still produces its own weapons. Today, 40% of US manufacturing is destined for the security industry. Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed - many of America's leading manufacturers now depend almost exclusively on orders from the Pentagon. They supplement their income by selling guns and combat gear to foreigners. The US may have lost the lead in autos, electronics, and energy, but it is number one in selling weapons.

'Security' spending - which has little to do with real security - now accounts for about one out of every three dollars spent by the US government and about 8% of the entire US GDP. It is the single biggest auction of stolen goods in the world.

No wonder it attracts so many bidders.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "The juice is in 'security'". Click here!

  

Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.