Drugs, drones and Fed drivel... - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 5 October 2013
Drugs, drones and Fed drivel... A  A  A

Buenos Aires, Argentina

"Dad, I've got to do something," begins a panicky letter from one of the children.

"When I changed by job status I lost my health insurance. The best policy I can find is $550 a month. What should I do?"

"Don't buy the insurance," we suggested. "It's a waste of money. Just don't get sick," we added helpfully.

Yesterday, stocks continued to fall - down 138 on the Dow to under 15,000. Gold dropped a little too, but not much.

What does it mean? But consider this...

There are two ways a government can rip off its citizens - force and/or fraud. Health care uses both.

Back in the time of Genghis, Attila, Caesar and Napoleon, things were simpler. People were conquered. They submitted. "Insurgents" were disposed of. Houses were looted. Maidens were deflowered. Those were the good ol' days - before health insurance!

But even in the oldest of days, a man on his own could keep a whole population under his heel. He needed help. Thus were born the ruling elites, sharing power among at least enough people to control the armed forces. There are governors of all sorts, but if they don't control military and police, they will soon be governed by them.

Just Released - Investing ABCs

Master the Basics of Investing!

Read our all new book... "Investing ABCs".

Authored by Equitymaster, exclusively for you!

Download Now! It's Free...

The beauty of democracy is that it defrauds the average person into believing that he has been taken into the ruling elite. He thinks that ultimately, he decides what government does. Naturally, he deserves a share in the spoils.

All government is an exercise in larceny. All governments take things away from some people - power, money, dignity, freedom -- in order to bestow favors on the ruling elite and its clients. The masses willingly and eagerly go along, if they think they can get something out of it -- that is, someone else's property.

The argument in Congress, which when last we checked was holding up the whole parade, was over how free 'health care' is administered. Approximately $2.2 trillion is spent annually in America - more, per capita than in any other nation - on health-related consumption. The fight is over who gets the money and who gets the care. It is a zombie war, in other words...with some combatants, perhaps, less zombified than others. As far as we know, no one suggests the obvious solution - let people decide for themselves.

In order to win elections, the feds need to give as well as take. So, in addition to public safety and national security, they offer free health care, free education, free highways, and free elections, to determine who gets what.

As near as we can tell, most of the money spent on health care is simply wasted. Just compare life expectancies. France has a nationalized system. It costs considerably less per person than the US system. Switzerland, Britain, Holland, Germany - all the developed countries have health care programs partly or wholly run by the feds. All spend substantially less than the US and all have about the same or better life expectancies.

Taking a more extreme example, Cuba spends only a fraction as much as the US...yet it too has life expectancy rates that are not much different.

Here again, you might be tempted to say the feds have failed to create an efficient health care system in the US. In that, you would certainly be correct, but you would miss the larger point: the US feds succeeded better than any of their rivals in transferring wealth from the dumbbell public to their wily favorites in the insurance and health care industries.

And wait...what's this?

    Researchers at the London School of Economics, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute at Harvard Medical School and Stanford University School of Medicine compared the effectiveness of exercise versus drugs on mortality across four conditions (secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, rehabilitation of stroke, treatment of heart failure and prevention of diabetes).

    Secondary prevention refers to treating patients with existing disease before it causes significant illness.

    They analyzed the results of 305 randomized controlled trials involving 339,274 individuals and found no statistically detectable differences between exercise and drug interventions for secondary prevention of heart disease and prevention of diabetes.
Well, that's great news, isn't it dear reader? Forget the pills. Just go out and take a walk. That should save the nation hundreds of billions, right?

Oh, dear reader, you crack us up. You've missed the point again. The idea is to transfer money, not help people become healthier. If the feds really wanted a healthy population and an efficient health care system, they'd cease offering health care services to anyone who was overweight, for example, or to anyone who couldn't do at least 10 push-ups.

Get it. They'd encourage people not to need health care. vAs the system works today, few people will choose exercise over drugs. When you exercise, you pay the 'costs' yourself. You have to spend the time...you have to do the work. But when you get 'free' drugs from Medicaid, someone else pays.

Get used to it...more drugs...more drones...and more Fed credit-pushing drivel.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Drugs, drones and Fed drivel...". Click here!

1 Responses to "Drugs, drones and Fed drivel..."

Sai N

Oct 5, 2013

All fine and dandy to say 'refuse treatment to those who are overweight, have an unhealthy lifestyle etc.'. I am hoping that this was at least made partly in jest.

But which civilised society allows its citizenry to die because of self-inflicted wounds? And who is to determine that the cause of the patient's current condition is due to self-neglect v/s organic condition? When is diabetes caused by bad genes v/s bad diet? And when does one condition turn into another?

This same commentator will (probably) also deride Mayor Bloomberg's much hated denouncement of large, sugary sodas and his attendant attempt to stop them. 'Stop large government from interfering in our private lives'.

Were the government to require every citizen to exercise a minimum number of hours, recorded in a central monitoring database, which can be accessed by any and every doctor, insurance company, health care provider etc), before you can receive basic medical treatment or even emergency treatment - guess what? BIG GOVERNMENT gone amock!

You cannot have it both ways.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Drugs, drones and Fed drivel...". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Deep State First
August 23, 2017
Nowhere was the darkness deeper than in the nation's capital. There, no light shone. No flicker of awareness...observation...learning...or reflection appeared.
A Darkness Is Spreading Across the US
August 22, 2017
Today, we are attacked by one preposterous thing after another, each of them even more absurd than the last.
Dear PM Modi, India is Already Land of Self-Employed, and It Ain't Working
August 21, 2017
Most Indians who cannot find jobs, look at becoming self-employed.
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.