Why such eagerness for war? - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 27 October 2014
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
Why such eagerness for war? A  A  A

Baltimore, Maryland

The Dow managed another day of gains on Friday. Up 127.

Among the many things still to be discovered is the effect of QE and ZIRP on the markets and the economy. We can't wait to find out. The Fed has pumped nearly $4 trillion into the system over the last 5 years. You're bound to get some kind of reaction to that kind of money.

But what? Higher stocks? More GDP growth? Higher incomes? More inflation? The authorities were hoping for a little more of everything. But all we see are higher stock prices. And if they were caused almost entirely by QE they should go back down when QE stops this week.

Unless, of course, the Fed changes its mind.

If it follows through and makes a clean break with QE, it risks getting blamed for a big crack up in the stock market. Most likely, the Fed won't want to take the chance. On the other hand, if it announces more QE, it risks creating an even bigger bubble...and getting blamed for that. Our guess is that we'll get a mealy-mouthed announcement that leaves investors reassured, but uncertain. The Fed won't allow a real bear market, but investors won't know how and when it will intervene next.

--- Advertisement ---
Warren Buffett - The Value Investor

Visit our Warren Buffett Page for a whole range of resources on the Oracle of Omaha...

Start with the Lessons from Buffett and go on to take the Quiz to see how well you know his investment style! Also, get details of books recommended by him, and access an opportunity to Invest like Buffett himself!

Get to know Buffett better! Click here...
---------------------------

When we left you for the weekend, we were talking about the reaction to the Ottawa murder of a soldier. There were 598 homicides in Canada in 2011 (the most recent year we could find). As far as we know, not a single one registered the slightest interest in the USA. But come a killing remotely related to Islamic extremists and hardly a newspaper or talk show host in the 50 states can avoid comment.

"War in the streets of the West," was how the Wall Street Journal put it; the WSJ wants a more muscular approach in the Mideast.

Why? After a quarter of a century...and trillions of dollars spent...and hundreds of thousands of dollars lost...America appears to have more enemies in the Muslim world than ever before. Why would anyone think that an even more activist foreign policy would produce a different result?

Professor Michael Glennon of Tuft's University asks the same question: Why such eagerness for war?

People think that our government policies are determined by elected officials who carry out the nation's will, as expressed in the ballot box. That is not the way it works. Instead, it doesn't really matter much what the voters want. They get some traction on the emotional and symbolic issues - gay marriage, minimum wage and so forth. But these issues don't really matter much to the elites anyway. What policies do matter are those that they can use to shift wealth from the people who earned it to themselves.

Mr. Glennon, a former legal counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has come to the same conclusion. He says he was curious as to why Barack Obama would end up with almost precisely the same foreign policies as George W. Bush. Glennon:

    It hasn't been a conscious decision....Members of Congress are generalists and need to defer to experts within the national security realm, as elsewhere. They are particularly concerned about being caught out on a limb having made a wrong judgment about national security and tend, therefore, to defer to experts, who tend to exaggerate threats. The courts similarly tend to defer to the expertise of the network that defines national security policy.

    The presidency itself is not a top-down institution, as many people in the public believe, headed by a president who gives orders and causes the bureaucracy to click its heels and salute. National security policy actually bubbles up from within the bureaucracy. Many of the more controversial policies, from the mining of Nicaragua's harbors to the NSA surveillance program, originated within the bureaucracy. John Kerry was not exaggerating when he said that some of those programs are "on autopilot."

    These particular bureaucracies don't set truck widths or determine railroad freight rates. They make nerve-center security decisions that in a democracy can be irreversible, that can close down the marketplace of ideas, and can result in some very dire consequences.

    I think the American people are deluded... They believe that when they vote for a president or member of Congress or succeed in bringing a case before the courts, that policy is going to change. Now, there are many counter-examples in which these branches do affect policy, as Bagehot predicted there would be. But the larger picture is still true-policy by and large in the national security realm is made by the concealed institutions.
Calling the Ottawa killing "war" not only belittles the real thing, it misses the point. There is no war on the streets of North America. But there is plenty of fraud.

Here is how it works. The security industry - the Pentagon, its hangers-on, its financiers, and its suppliers - stomps around the Mideast, causing death and havoc in the Muslim world. 'Terrorists,' naturally want to strike back at what they believe is the source of their sufferings, the USA. Sooner or later, one of them is bound make a go of it.

The typical voter hasn't got time to analyze and understand the complex motives and confusing storyline behind the event. He sees only the evil deed. His blood runs hot for both protection and retaliation. When the call goes up for more intervention and more security spending, he is behind it all the way.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Why such eagerness for war?". Click here!

1 Responses to "Why such eagerness for war?"

Satish S Dabholkar

Oct 28, 2014

Pl send this article for the information of Prime minister Mr Modi and ask him to be cautious while analyzing any advice received from US on defense.

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Why such eagerness for war?". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.