US is better off without the feds

Nov 12, 2010

London, England

"Debt delenda est," we told our audience in London this morning. "This is a debt story. It's not a liquidity story. It's not a 'capitalism has failed' story. It's not a regulatory story. It's the story of debt. Too much debt. Too much to pay back.

------------------------------ Free Webinar ------------------------------
We're delighted to invite you to participate in our first ever educative webinar of derivatives - Derivatives & YOU. Our guest will be Asad Dossani, a top derivative analyst.
In this 60-minute webinar, Asad aims to handhold you into the world of currency and commodity derivatives and deal with issues like "how to profit from derivatives" and "does gold have a price limit?"
We have limited seats, so we recommend you hurry! We're also giving a FREE guide on derivatives to all those who sign up now! For full details about this Webinar, please click here...

"So how does the story develop? That's what we're watching. Ultimately, when you have too much debt, there's no point in refinancing it. There's no point in rescheduling it. There's no point in delaying the inevitable. You need to destroy the bad debt. As fast as possible."

The Dow down 73 yesterday. Where is the follow through?

Hmmm... the Fed promises $600 billion to speculators. Alan Greenspan, writing in yesterday's Financial Times, says the Fed is out to lower the value of the dollar. Ben Bernanke says the Fed wants to increase asset prices.

And still stocks don't go up. They go down.

What is the meaning of it?

The whole idea of pumping money into the bond market - Bernanke admitted himself - was to get asset prices up. What else could it be?

Higher asset prices are supposed to make people feel richer. Then, they're supposed to act richer. What do rich people do? They spend money! And before you can say 'prestidigitation' they WILL be richer.

How exactly does that work? Oh never mind the'!

Ben Bernanke, one of the world's leading economists...and certainly the most powerful economist in the world says it works.

Do you believe it, dear reader?

We don't. If you could make people richer simply by printing money well, heck, we'd print it night and day. Maybe even weekends too.

But of course, it doesn't work.

So what DOES all that money printing do? Well, that's what we're going to find out.

One thing it doesn't seem to do - at least not yet - is the very thing it was supposed to do: raise asset prices. Instead, investors seem to be wary. It is as if they didn't trust it.

And why should they? Investors aren't stupid. They can put two and two together. Sometimes. They know as well as we do that all this money printing MIGHT do is to create a speculative, short-term bubble. As it looks now, they don't seem to have an appetite for that kind of thing.

So, as near as we can tell, our Great Correction hypothesis is still the best explanation of what is going on. The US (and other nations) went into bubble mode in the 2002-2007 period. The bubble blew up. And now they're paying the price. It will take years to clean up the damage - even under the best of circumstances. With Bernanke and the Feds doing even more mischief, it could take decades.

But the big risk is that the Feds will make so many mistakes...and such big mistakes...that it will be impossible to correct them in a calm, orderly way.

The private sector can fix itself up. All the feds have to do is to get out of the way. The banks and corporations that can't stand on their own two feet will fall down; we'll be better off without them. That's the way it has always worked. The markets can destroy bad debt. They don't need any help from the feds.

It won't be painless. It may not even be fast - about 7 to 10 years was our estimate. But if it is allowed to happen, the economy can once again get on solid ground.

But enter the feds...the ever earnest, world-improving meddlers...power-mad and reckless. They really believe the economy would be much better if it would just do as they say. "Stop destroying debt," they tell us.

So, they stopped the wobbly banks from going bust. They saved Fannie and Freddie - at a cost of a third of a trillion dollars, according to the latest estimate from the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

They pumped. They bailed. They jury rigged. And they commanded.

"Let there be light," they say. And darkness covers the economy.

The economy responds to these commands - just like any economy would respond to such central planning: it slumps and gets worse.

While the private sector cuts debt, the feds add to it. This latest $600 billion from the Fed sounds like free money. But it is debt. These are Federal Reserve Notes they're issuing. They are claims against the wealth of the US government directly and against taxpayers indirectly. If you have these notes, you can exchange them for goods and services. They're lawful says so right on the green paper. You can use this 'money' to get toaster ovens or granite countertops...or a cup of coffee.

But the more of this 'money' there is...the fewer goods and services are available to it. Simple, huh?

A classic case, right? The dollar goes down; the price of stuff goes up.

Private debt goes down. Public debt goes up. And then, the markets destroy public debt too.

More news:

And more thoughts:

*** Oh yes...we were having a drink with Caroline. She runs a business for us in Paris called Les Belles Lettres. It's one of the oldest book publishers in France...publishing what must be the oldest books in the world - the classics from the Greek and Latin periods. She publishes them in the original language, with a translation into French on the facing page.

Caroline explains:

"We've really got the entire field to ourselves. Of course, it's a tiny field. Fewer and fewer people can read the ancient languages. It's a shame. But this is the source of all our ideas...our way of thinking about things. You don't really understand who you are unless you understand where you've come from. In the Western world, this is where we've come from - the books that we have left from Aristotle, Virgil, Xenothon, and the rest of them.

"We had two competitors. But they're dropping out.

"You know, there are only about 1,300 known, existing works from the classical period. Only about 1,000 of them have ever been published in modern form. Of course, it takes a scholar years to 'establish' the check the compare the sources...and so forth. We commissioned one book in the 1950s. The manuscript just came in a couple of years ago.

"It's a tedious business. And then, when we get a book out...we only sell a few hundred copies - to university libraries, mostly.

"So that's probably why our competitors are dropping out. One of them was bought by a big firm. They probably had accountants who put a stop to it.

"But this goes beyond money. We're the last guardians of the temple. We can't give up. We have to stick with it. We have to protect this heritage."

"Yeah...and find some way to make money at it," we replied.


Junk Science

"The most ignorant remarks ever made by a central banker.'

"When I started my economics studies at 16," wrote Paul A. Samuelson not long before he died last year at aged 93, "Carlyle was right to call economics a 'dismal science.' Thanks to modern science and better economic knowledge, this Malthusian curse has been vanquished. Good modern economics make economics the Hopeful Science. At last!"

Lucky professor Samuelson! Like an apparatchik who joined the shades before 1989, he went to his reward with his delusions intact.

This week, the scientists began to have doubts. Like the pope wondering about the resurrection, or the Mormons questioning the veracity of the angel Moroni, the head of the World Bank, Robert Zoellick, shocked the learned world. It's time to start discussing a gold-backed currency, he said. Maybe the crown of creation of modern economics -- its centrally managed money - was not such a good idea after all.

Like Christianity, the dollar only has value as long as people have faith in it. But that is true of almost every trick up the modern economist's sleeve. If people stop believing, the spell is broken and they're worthless.

Two years ago, when the financial world was melting down, we were told that the volcano needed to be appeased. Without immediate injection of funds, the whole system would blow up, they said. Where was the science behind that? The financial system melted down countless times in the past. No central bank came to its aid before the 1930s.

Or how about the corollary article of faith: that the public had to rescue the big banks, a tout prix? It was practically a universal constant - like the Golden mean or Brownian motion. When bankers make profits, it is theirs to keep. When they lose money, the losses are moved onto the public. The US bailed out its banks. Britain, Ireland, and Iceland did the same. But where was the evidence that bank failures were so horrible? During America's Great Depression 9,000 banks failed. And history is full of the wrecks of banks that were 'too big to fail.'

A hick Congressman from one of the corn states once proposed to round off pi to 3 to make it easier for schoolchildren to remember. He must have been joking, In the world of science, water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit, at sea level, whether you believe or not. Pi is always a long string of digits. The mathematicians can sweat and shake all they want; it doesn't change. But modern economists take the joke seriously. They think they can command water to run uphill and reset the Periodic Table with fancier china. That's why they hate gold: they can't control it. And it reminds them that they are imposters, no more effective than witchdoctors or marriage counselors.

As of this writing, it takes more than $1,400 to buy a single ounce of gold - a new record. Why? Isn't it obvious? People are losing faith. Last week, the US Federal Reserve said it was creating another $600 billion to buy US Treasury debt. That will mean a total of $2.3 trillion added to America's monetary footings since the Fed began its QE program almost two years ago. This will also mean that Ben Bernanke has added three times as many dollars to America's core money supply as ALL THE TREASURY SECRETARIES AND FED CHAIRMEN WHO CAME BEFORE HIM PUT TOGETHER.

"Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth," wrote Mr. Bernanke, in the Washington Post, "...higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion."

Where is the proof? Where is the controlled test? Where is the peer review? Such an extravagant assertion ought to be accompanied by extravagant evidence. But there is none at all. Throwing virgins into a volcano would be no less scientific. The virgins appeased the gods; that was the theory. Mr. Bernanke has a voodoo theory too. He says all that new money will make people feel richer...and then they will act richer...and then they will be richer!

John Hussman, also an economist with a loyal following of his own, read Mr. Bernanke's explanation and pronounced judgment: "the most ignorant remarks ever made by a central banker." The latest $600 billion gamble may or may not increase stock market prices, he says. Even if it does, it is unlikely to produce the 'wealth effect' that Ben Bernanke is counting on. People spend and borrow when they think they have permanent wealth. World stock markets have suffered two major shocks in the last ten years...with no net gains for investors. An increase in stock prices now - driven by the Fed's printing press -- is unlikely to create the kind of expectations that lead people to spend money. Especially when they don't have any.

Which makes us wonder too. If modern economists are scientists, it makes us suspicious of the rest of them. What about the physicists? The molecular biologists? The archeologists? Are they all quacks too?

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

A New Infrastructure Boom March 26, 2019
Selva Freigedo talks about the potential in 5G network and how it could transform the way we communicate.
A 40 Somethings Guide to YouTube Hits March 20, 2019
Vivek dwells into a new YouTube phenomenon.
As the Economy Slows Down, Maruti and Two-Wheeler Companies Cut Production March 19, 2019
The country's largest car maker has cut production by more than a fourth.
In Supporting Demonetisation, RBI Behaved Like an Old Uncle Not Willing to Take a Stand March 13, 2019
The minutes of the meeting of the RBI Board which happened before demonetisation have been released.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "US is better off without the feds". Click here!