|Fiscal cliff will not solve US' problems
||A A A
We're on the cliff now...the falaise...the escarpment...
And we're holding on by our fingernails.
According to the popular press, if we lose our grip we will surely fall into the red-hot bowels of Hell.
----------------- Anniversary Offer: 50% Off + 1-Yr Additional Access + Exclusive 3-CD Set -----------------
To celebrate Equitymaster Learning's First Anniversary, we have something extra special for you:
3-CD Set containing 24 Hours of Learning Videos
50% Off on the subscription fee
One Year of Additional Online Access
And a lot more! Don't miss this opportunity! Full details here...
Here's the latest from Reuters:
...optimists assumed that Congress and President Barack Obama would return after last week's elections with a plan - perhaps a temporary fix - to avoid the $600 billion in tax increases and budget cuts set to start in January that threaten to throw the economy back into recession.
The stock market has already registered its disquiet. The Dow lost more than 400 points on the two days following Obama's victory. On Friday, prices stopped falling...but there was no bounce. Investors are worried...
But they didn't.
Some also assumed the election would give one party or the other an edge that could break the impasse over how to reduce the nation's deficit.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reiterated last week that jumping off the cliff would boost the jobless rate to 9 percent from the current 7.9 percent.
But you know our view. It ain't a cliff...it's a water slide. There will be some howls of fear and excitement going down the chute. And then, we all get soaked!
President Obama is on the case. According to the weekend news, he's fired the opening shot in what is supposed to be the 'Battle of the Fiscal Cliff.' He led off with a direct hit on the 1%...the rich. Heck, they can pay more taxes, says the president of all the Americans. The Economic Times of India:
WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama said Friday that he would insist that tax increases on affluent Americans be part of any agreement to avoid a year-end fiscal crisis, setting up a possible confrontation with congressional Republicans who say they will oppose a rise in tax rates for the rich.
We have no argument against him. Sure, the rich CAN pay more tax. But according to the organization that we used to run (back in the '70s!) - the National Taxpayers Union - the top 1% of taxpayers already pays 36% of all federal taxes. In other words, they pay 36 times more, proportionately, than they should. Do they get a greater benefit out of the SEC, the FDA, the CIA and the rest of the feds' scammy agencies? Do they get more security from the feds' drones? Do they get more foodstamps? Or more unemployment comp? Or more Medicaid? No? Then why should they pay more?
In his first remarks from the White House since his re-election, Obama made it clear that he believed his victory had validated his relentless campaign call for wealthier Americans to pay more and he expected Republicans to heed that message.
Never mind. The top 1% of taxpayers pay an average tax of $343,927. Seems like more than enough for anybody.
But forget fairness. Just look at what happens when they pay more. These are people who already have satisfied their lifestyle ambitions, presumably. They don't need to buy a bigger car or a bigger house - they already have these things. They don't need the money for consumption purposes. So, if the feds didn't take that $343,927 what would happen to it? It would of course be invested. It's capital, in other words. It is the stuff that you need if you're going to build a new factory...or a new app...or whatever. Sometimes the wealthy make good investment decisions...sometimes they made bad decisions. Still, this capital - the savings of people who can afford to save - is what funds new jobs, new technology and new industries. It's what powers an economy towards real growth, with higher wages...and greater prosperity.
Instead, if the feds take the money, what happens to it? It is consumed. It pays for more drones. Or maybe to give more drugs to old people. Or, maybe it is used to hire more regulators and administrators who further gum-up the economy.
It would better - in terms of final results - to let the economy go over the cliff. At least spending would be going in the right direction - down. But wait. Is that true? Nope... Even going over the cliff still leaves the feds spending more money...just not as much as they planned to spend. It still leaves the US with an ADDITIONAL $8.3 trillion in deficits over the next 10 years. Some cliff!
As it is, Congress stands on the edge. Politicians are battling with each other. One group wants to tax the rich. The other wants to cut spending. They're fighting it out on the edge of the precipice...each side trying to force the other to pay...each trying to protect its own zombie clients and zombie voters...
What the hell. Give them all a shove!
Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.
||Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
|Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
|Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.
|The Most Important Innovation in Finance Since Gold Coins
August 10, 2017
Bill connects the dots...between money and growth, real money and real resources, gold and cryptocurrencies...and between gold, cryptocurrencies, and time.
|The Most Profitable Investment in the History of the World
August 8, 2017
'Yes, it looks like a bubble. And, yes, it's like buying a lottery ticket. But there's something happening that has never happened before. It's an evolutionary leap in money itself.'