Govt. doesn't take 'no' for an answer - The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning by Bill Bonner
On This Day - 14 November 2013
PRINTER FRIENDLY | ARCHIVES
Govt. doesn't take 'no' for an answer A  A  A

Rancho Santana, Nicaragua

Dow up 70 yesterday. Gold down a little. Not much to draw our attention.

So, today we conclude our reminiscences from our Ireland trip. The format was a debate. But it felt like a demolition derby:

"I can't believe you compared government employees to rapists?" One of the attendees at the Kilkenny hoedown got on our case. "That's ridiculous. They're there to protect people. What about policemen? Firemen? Not to mention, the people who saved the economy from another depression?"

"Well...stick with us a minute," we enjoined. "We're just trying to understand the real nature of government regulation. Is it something where you can 'just say NO!'? Or is it something where you're gonna get...(we hesitated a moment....the sentence we were about to complete required the f-word. The audience would understand it. But we're not an f-word kind of guy...) ...where you're gonna get screwed, whether you like it or not?"

The Irish women bought on the slave market were usually taken into harems, either as concubines or servants. There, they were protected...by guards, eunuchs, regulators...and ultimately, by the Ottoman Turk Army. But what kind of protection was it? Could they just say NO?

They were not even asked. They had been bought for the pleasure of their owners. As far as we know from first hand accounts, they didn't have to be forced to submit. They went along with the program, like travelers in a TSA line...or taxpayers enduring an audit. When the feds tell you bend over...you have no choice. That is very different from a market economy, where you might be compelled by necessity or by desire, but not by naked force.

Surrounded by silks and sunshine of Algiers, the Baltimore women might have looked on the bright side. Rather than a lifetime of sex-slavery, they might have thought they gotten a reprieve from the prison of hard work and the relentless cold, dark and damp of Ireland.

-------------------------------- 3 "Buy and Forget" Dividend Paying Small Caps... --------------------------------

It's tough to find stocks which you could own for years at end...

Stocks which are fundamentally strong with the potential to grow your wealth... and which pay you regular dividends year-after-year as well!

However today, we have zeroed in on 3 'Rare' Dividend paying Small Caps which you could Buy & Forget!

These 3 stocks meet all the factors above and more...

In fact, one of these 3 has paid regular dividends for more than 100 years now!

I'm sure you're interested to know more.

So, Click here for more details...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Besides, getting to share the pasha's bed was an honor. If it brought children, the children might inherit his money and his position; their mother might become ruler of the harem itself. Many European women made what must have been happy marriages in the Islamic system... Many became rich and powerful themselves. Many felt their new masters treated them better than their husbands back home. And when, 14 years later, a warship from Britain arrived in Algiers and negotiated the Baltimore slaves' release, only two women - out of an original 34 - wanted to go back.

For men, if you weren't sold off into hard labor, slavery in North Africa could be similarly supple. Slaves could practice their own religions. They spoke their own languages. They were free to operate their own businesses. They could make money. They could learn skills and fill important roles in almost all industries. Some became slavers themselves - like Jan Jensen, who became Morat Rais, whose son Anthony, used the family name Van Salee and moved to New York. With the profits of the white slave trade he was able to buy a substantial part of what is today Brooklyn, New York.

Some slaves became traders and financiers, buying and selling goods from all over the Mediterranean. At least one amassed a fortune, while still a slave. Some got away, like Miguel de Cervantes and Captain John Smith, of the Virginia colony.... Others didn't want to get away.

Algiers was an advanced economy with a standard of living considerably higher than in London or Paris - unless you were a slave. Part of the reason for its prosperity was probably the freedom it allowed its slaves.

Slavery came with many contradictions and nuances. In North Africa as well as North America it prospered in what were otherwise successful market economies. And in both places, it was reinforced, regulated and subsidized by the government. Poor whites in Alabama paid (modest) taxes to help support the government, whose main challenge was to control slave labor. Few poor whites probably realized it, but they were victims of involuntary servitude too -- forced to subsidize the slaveholders, by paying some of the costs of policing their slaves. Likewise, on the Barbary Coast a vast and confusing web of levies, fees, commissions and taxes were used to maintain the garrisons that kept slaves from escaping.

Do we have to spell it out? In every industry, in every epoch, the regulators and the regulated...the parasite and the host...share the same goal: to connive against the public interest. Armed with the police power of the state, they don't take 'no' for an answer.

Government was complicit in the slave trade at every level. How slaves were to be marketed, employed, and disposed of was typically codified by the legislature and enforced by the police. Runaways were captured at taxpayer expense. Punishments were established by government employees...and often administered by them. Most important, government bore much of the cost of policing slavery, making it a viable institution long after it should have disappeared.

But today, slavery has been abolished in most of the world. We still have wage slaves...and tax slaves. But chattel slavery has largely disappeared. Progress has been made. It is not an eternal cycle of cooperation, followed by violence, after all. Over time, cooperation increases.

Why is that? Because cooperation pays. And the more civilized a society becomes the more essential it is to cooperate.

By contrast, violence pays badly. You might be able to whip a group of field hands to keep them on the job, but their output would be minimal. Only at the most rote tasks is slave labor a practical alternative. In modern industries, it is not competitive. Imagine slaves elaborating a marketing strategy. Imagine slaves driving trucks. Imagine slaves in the accounting department. Imagine slaves in Hollywood, rewriting scripts. Imagine them in the pharmaceutical industry, conducting double-blind tests. Imagine them with chainsaws clearing power lines. Compared to properly-incentivized free workers, with stock options and healthcare plans, equipped with the latest machinery and trained to use it, slaves can't compete.

Several inconclusive experiments have been conducted on the issue. Germany ran much of its industry on slave labor during WWII. The Soviet Union operated a quasi-slave economy for decades. The Japanese used prisoners of war on various projects. Napoleon tried to re-introduce slavery to French possessions in order to use forced labor on sugar plantations. This effort failed so miserably that France not only abandoned the whole project, it sold Louisiana to the United States.

Slavery didn't pay. By the end of the 19th century, it had been abandoned almost everywhere.

This makes us wonder about government itself. Does it pay? Is it transitional too? Will it disappear, like slavery? Maybe.

But wait. Who won the argument?

"You think regulators are going to keep capitalism on the straight and narrow? Ha ha ha...." we said.

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer:
The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Get The Daily Reckoning directly
in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Govt. doesn't take 'no' for an answer". Click here!

1 Responses to "Govt. doesn't take 'no' for an answer"

Prem S Khamesra

Nov 14, 2013

When will they nominate Bill for a Nobel? Or will they ever, given his rebellious thoughts? I personally think he talks pure common sense and is spot on.

Like 
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Govt. doesn't take 'no' for an answer". Click here!

Recent Articles:
Trump Takes a Beating
August 18, 2017
Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.
Which Gods Will Bring Down the US Empire?
August 17, 2017
Mr Trump is in the White House and the gods are in their heavens; what's not to like?
Will They Haul Off Trump's Statue, Too?
August 16, 2017
All across the country, the old gods become devils. New, gluten-free gods take their places...
Farm Loan Waivers: Why Bad Economics Makes for Good Politics
August 14, 2017
It is because the negative effects of the waivers aren't clearly visible.