Feds are at the center of the racket

Dec 7, 2010

Melbourne, Australia

"A day that will live in infamy..."

- Franklin D. Roosevelt

The Dow down 19 points yesterday. Gold up $9.

------------------------------ Last Chance ------------------------------
Asad Dossani's Currency and Commodity recommendation service, The Lucrative Derivative Report, is currently available at Half Off under an exclusive introductory offer.
But to make the most of this opportunity, you need to act now! This offer is available only for a few more hours... Till 5 PM Today. Click here for full details...

Thanks to the socialist Senator from Vermont, Bernie Sanders, we get to see what the Fed is up to. He insisted on learning where the Fed's bailout money was going. Turns out, not only did billions go to European banks...billions more went to firms in the US that pretended they needed no help.

Goldman Sachs, for example.

Goldman went to the Fed 212 times between March 2008 and March 2009, according to Fed documents. It collected nearly $600 billion.

Morgan Stanley. GE. Citigroup. They were all in on it.

The Fed put out $3.3 trillion worth of credit, buying up speculators' bad bets. Not surprisingly, the price of the bad credits rose. So that now the Fed can say it hasn't lost a penny.

Ha. Ha. What a sense of humor!

Let's imagine that instead of banking and speculating...Goldman was a cabbage grower. And let's say Goldman over-did it. It planted far too much cabbage. The price dropped...and Goldman was on the verge of bankruptcy. So, in comes the Fed...and buys cabbage by the boatload. And what do you know? The price of cabbage goes up. So, the Fed then looks in its warehouse and it finds it owns tons of cabbage. It multiplies the price of cabbage by what it has in inventory. Wow! It hasn't lost a penny!

(For more on the magic of modern central banking...see below...)

The feds are supposed to pursue corrupt operators. But now the feds are at the center of the racket. Talk about infamy? Now, it's right here at home...

How does the racket work? It's very simple. The Fed hands out money to its powerful cronies. Remember, the Fed is a private bank. It serves what is supposedly a public purpose. But it is neither owned nor controlled by the government. Instead, it's part of the banking industry. Its official role is to give the US a trustworthy currency...and (more recently) to promote full employment. You can see how well it fulfilled the first part of its mission. Consumer prices are up about 33 times since the Fed was formed in 1913.
Or, to look at it another way, a $20 gold piece from pre-Fed days - a one-ounce US gold coin - is now worth about $1,450. How's that for a stable currency?

As to employment... Before 1913, unemployment was virtually unheard of. Why? There was a free market in labor. If you need to work, you took whatever work you could get at the then-prevailing wage. End of the story. There were no subsidies for people who were unemployed. No minimum wages. No safety nets. It was just supply and demand. When demand for labor increased, so did wages. When it decreased, wages went down. Except for brief periods of adjustment, there was no unemployment.

And now? Well, you know the facts as well as we do.

The Fed's real mission now is to make sure the banks stay in business and make a profit. This it does in the simplest way - by transferring money to the banks. How does it get the money? It just prints it up. Who pays the bill? Eventually, taxpayers and citizens...when this new money reduces the value of their old money.

Neat huh? Who complains? Who has a cause of action? Who even realizes what is going on?

The European Central Bank is duplicating this trick in the other part of the Old World. It is buying up the debt of Ireland and Greece. And what ho! The more you buy...the more the price goes up. Pretty soon, the ECB - with hundreds of billions of this paper in its vault - will be able to announce that it too has made money!

But there's a strange smell coming from the central bank vaults. Maybe that cabbage isn't so good after all.

*** It says here in the Financial Review that Australia is boosting its exports of ore to China. It will export more than one billion tons per year.

Wait a minute. At that rate there soon won't be anything left Down Under....

Elsewhere, the Financial Review's man on the scene in Manhattan tells us that "Jobs data spoils recovery hopes."

"A painful reality check," he calls it.

*** Melbourne is an agreeable place. We see it from the dining room...out across the river... There are polished steel and glass skyscrapers... gracious old buildings ...tramways...and there is the Melbourne aquarium...a modernist white building with sails as an architectural motif.

People come and go on their bicycles. And on the river, rowers add a Cambridge-like touch of civilized athleticism.

It is nothing like Beijing or Mumbai. There is no hustle. No bustle. No noise to speak of. You can practically hear the rowers' oars as they break water on the Yarra River. Each person has plenty of space. You could drop a Congressman from a helicopter and not hit a single voter.

It seems like a nice place to live...agreeable...calm...but prosperous.

Melbourne's prosperity probably comes largely from selling off bits of Australia - by the pound -- to China. When prices for metals are high, Australia rides high. When they suddenly turn down, so do the faces of Australia's investors and businessmen.

At present, prices for steel and other metals are high. So Melbourne is a happy place.

Smart people save their money in the fat years, knowing that lean years cannot be far off. Currently, Australians are saving about 10% of disposable income.
That's two to three times more than Americans.

*** Colleague Justice Litle sent us this explanation of the modern, enlightened way to manage an economy.

Mary is the proprietor of a bar in Dublin. She realises that virtually all of her customers are unemployed alcoholics and, as such, can no longer afford to patronise her bar. To solve this problem, she comes up with new marketing plan that allows her customers to drink now, but pay later. She keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting the customers loans).

Word gets around about Mary's "drink now, pay later" marketing strategy and, as a result, increasing numbers of customers flood into Mary's bar. Soon she has the largest sales volume for any bar in Dublin .

By providing her customers' freedom from immediate payment demands, Mary gets no resistance when, at regular intervals, she substantially increases her prices for wine and beer, the most consumed beverages. Consequently, Mary's gross sales volume increases massively. A young and dynamic vice-president at the local bank recognises that these customer debts constitute valuable future assets and increases Mary's borrowing limit. He sees no reason for any undue concern, since he has the debts of the unemployed alcoholics as collateral.

At the bank's corporate headquarters, expert traders figure a way to make huge commissions, and transform these customer loans into DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS. These securities are then bundled and traded on international security markets. Naive investors don't really understand that the securities being sold to them as AAA secured bonds are really the debts of unemployed alcoholics. Nevertheless, the bond prices continuously climb, and the securities soon become the hottest-selling items for some of the nation's leading brokerage houses.

One day, even though the bond prices are still climbing, a risk manager at the original local bank decides that the time has come to demand payment on the debts incurred by the drinkers at Mary's bar. He so informs Mary.

Mary then demands payment from her alcoholic patrons, but being unemployed alcoholics they cannot pay back their drinking debts. Since, Mary cannot fulfill her loan obligations she is forced into bankruptcy. The bar closes and the eleven employees lose their jobs.

Overnight, DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS drop in price by 90%. The collapsed bond asset value destroys the banks liquidity and prevents it from issuing new loans, thus freezing credit and economic activity in the community.

The suppliers of Mary's bar had granted her generous payment extensions and had invested their firms' pension funds in the various BOND securities. They find they are now faced with having to write off her bad debt and with losing over 90% of the presumed value of the bonds. Her wine supplier also claims bankruptcy, closing the doors on a family business that had endured for three generations, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor, who immediately closes the local plant and lays off 150 workers.

Fortunately though, the bank, the brokerage houses and their respective executives are saved and bailed out by a multi-billion euro no-strings attached cash infusion from their cronies in Government. The funds required for this bailout are obtained by new taxes levied on employed, middle-class, non-drinkers who have never been in Mary's bar.

Now, do you understand economics in 2010?

Bill Bonner is the President & Founder of Agora Inc, an international publisher of financial and special interest books and newsletters.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

A New Infrastructure Boom March 26, 2019
Selva Freigedo talks about the potential in 5G network and how it could transform the way we communicate.
A 40 Somethings Guide to YouTube Hits March 20, 2019
Vivek dwells into a new YouTube phenomenon.
As the Economy Slows Down, Maruti and Two-Wheeler Companies Cut Production March 19, 2019
The country's largest car maker has cut production by more than a fourth.
In Supporting Demonetisation, RBI Behaved Like an Old Uncle Not Willing to Take a Stand March 13, 2019
The minutes of the meeting of the RBI Board which happened before demonetisation have been released.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Feds are at the center of the racket". Click here!

3 Responses to "Feds are at the center of the racket"

k c navada

Dec 7, 2010

Mary's story is a nice explanation.But are people so naive and foolish?


Ernst Laub

Dec 7, 2010

Dear Bill,
I like very much the way you explain occulted facts (e.g. through the "Mary's drink now pay later" story.)
By the way, the same banksters that caused the financial disaster of the last years "convinced" nearly 100 years ago President Wilson to send troops to Europe because the war credits granted by the American Banks to France and Great Britain became too insecure. "Liberty Bonds" (sold by boy scouts to naive “patriotic” Americans) and US soldiers' lives were saving at that time the assets of the shareholder banks of the Fed. As we know now, the American intervention led to an unfair peace agreement (e.g. “Versailles”, dismantling - without any democratic legitimation - Germany and Austria-Hungary), to a financial catastrophe (mainly in Germany) and to the take-over of the power by communism and later on for a while of national-socialism (which was not too bad for US capitalism as you can see when studying the Bush family history!).
It is interesting to know that World War 1 was not only a shameful criminal US intervention but also the first "preventive war" of the United States in order to eliminate a potential rival: old Kaiser Wilhelm’s Germany (I don’t and will not speak of Hitler’s “Germany” that was a product of national and international capitalism: Take for an illustration the case of Hitler’s US Banker H. G. Schacht!). This Prussian Germany (Hitler’s “Germany” was in fact not Prussian!) in its original borders, with its economic power and political influence and independence from the Wall Street was a big challenge for Wall Street and for the “City”: It had to disappear!
To-day, we might be in front of an other risk of that kind but much more dangerous: The Wall Street might want the elimination of an independent, powerful China that will sooner or later be stronger than the United States, the US army and the Wall Street (US and UK were 100 years ago(and definitively 65 years ago)just in time to destroy Germany... but now they are much too late to avoid Chinese top position as a political, economic and financial world power!). I hope the American people will be able to stop the disastrous US war mongers (if not the Americans will be guilty in the same way as Germans under Hitler... By the way, most people think that fascism is in any case linked with racism.... In fact, the future US fascism will no more need anticommunism, racism and “anti-semitism” as “basic ideology" but “anti-terrorism”, “safety folly”, the gradual abolition of civil rights and the instalment of methods of intimidation (like in the beginning of Hitler) and of structures (logistics and networks) of detention (Hitler started 1933 with rather small concentration camps just for the intimidation of his critics!). The only difference of Hitler’s fascism and future US fascism is that Hitler preferred troups and prisons that are controlled by his party where as the future fascist rulers in the USA will prefer private armies and private prisons (controlled by the shareholders and “elits”). Under such circumstances it is not very important that Hitler wanted the racial pure population whereas future fascist leaders in the United States will continue to promote the multinational society (which is better for “divide et impera” (divide and rule) in the imperial sense).......
....And a final question on US democracy. I am from Switzerland and I am living in Europe and cannot understand the corrupt US bi-party system: Why do real and worthy left wing men such as Ralph Nader and real and worthy right wing man such as Pat Buchanan have no chance of winning any election? I think the US people would need the election of such men and women! Will the “Tea Party” change anything?


Easwara Narayanan

Dec 7, 2010

The situation could not have been explained more succintly.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Feds are at the center of the racket". Click here!