US central bankers should be jailed
1 OCTOBER 2010
Frankie looked up at the judge
Judge, what will be my fine?
And the judge looked down at Frankie...
Girl, you got 99
------------------------------ Don't Miss ------------------------------
We are delighted to offer you our latest publication - The Definitive Guide To Derivatives.
This guide will empower you with all the necessary knowledge you need to take your first steps to investing profitably in derivatives.
The best part, dear reader, is that this guide is Absolutely Free Of Any Charge. try our free-for-life daily newsletter - The 5 Minute WrapUp - for a week! Click here Right away!
Frankie and Johnny
We feel sorry for Jerome Kerviel. Such a good looking young man. With such a promising future. He was the trader with Societe General who lost 4.9 billion euros in unauthorized trading.
Now, the poor fellow has faced the music. Trouble was, it wasn't a tune he wanted to hear. And it seemed a little inappropriate to the occasion to us too. More below...
The news yesterday was mixed. Unemployment increased in September. The dollar and US bonds yields hit new lows. And China said that trying to force it to revalue its currency would be a "disaster for the world."
Stocks rose 22 points on the Dow. Gold went up another $7.
Gold must be ready for a correction. Or else we really have reached the final stage...the runaway stage in the great bull market.
Back to Kerviel...
Kerviel drew a five year sentence (two years suspended.) Plus, he's supposed to repay 4.9 billion euros...
"By his deliberate actions, he put in peril the existence of the bank that employed 140,000 people, of which he was a part and whose future was threatened," said the judge.
Well, we're sure he didn't do it intentionally. We mean, he didn't intend to bring down the bank.
Besides, a lot of other people made authorized trades that were much bigger...which also put their banks in jeopardy. In fact, some of the CEOs of the world's largest banks also put their institutions in harm's way. And then, when the banks ran into the ditch, these guys didn't get five years and a $7 billion fine. Instead, they got a $50 million bonus!
Kerviel recalled a card trick at corporate party:
"Ladies and gentlemen, it's up to you and our clients to find the margin. It has disappeared. Where's it gone? Not here. Not there. Aha! Here it is, in my pocket!"
It didn't go into Kerviel's pocket. He's penniless. The fine is about $6.7 billion. The man is said to earn about $3,000 a month. Talk about debt repayment! Let's see, if he saves half his money each month. And he puts it all to paying off his debt to Societe Generale... that's $36,000 per year.
Hmm... if the poor man lives for 200,000 years...he'll still be paying.
But wait. Suppose this quantitative easing thing takes off....
Yes, dear reader, central bankers are probably the biggest rogue traders of all. Remember Alan Greenspan? He has an opinion in the Financial Times today. We read it twice. Neither time did we discover anything new. He says the problem is fear. Until the fear diminishes...don't expect businesses to start many new projects or hire many new employees. Thanks a lot for that insight, Alan.
Alan Greenspan is probably more to blame than any other human being for today's financial crisis. He made a huge bet and put the whole world economy at risk. He bet that he knew better than the market. He put the Fed's key lending rate below the rate of consumer price inflation...and left it there for 4 years. Over $12 trillion was lost - in America alone. Where's the jail cell waiting for him? Where's the $12 trillion fine?
And now central bankers are betting big again...BIG...and they risk not only putting the 140,000 employees of Societe Generale out of work...but hundreds of millions of other people all over the world.
Central bankers are betting that they can add billions in QE money to the world's money supply, without causing a calamity. Maybe they can. Maybe they can't. It's never been done before.
But every previous experiment with paper money has ended in disaster. Paper money never survived an entire credit cycle. When credit was expanding, people were happy to take the paper. When it shrank, they became fearful of the paper and wanted something more substantial. Paper money always ends up worthless.
Kerviel's bets went well as long as credit was expanding. He was up more than $1 billion at one point. Then, when the markets began going down, so did his gambles.
Will it be any different for the central banks? Will their bets go bad too - perhaps in a spectacular blow-off in which the dollar itself becomes almost worthless. Remember, if the dollar loses just the equivalent of 5% of its 1900 value - there's nothing left. It will be completely worthless.
Could it happen? Central bankers risk a full-blown currency calamity, worldwide, with full knowledge aforethought... This is premeditated currency assassination, in other words.
Where's the jail cell waiting for Bernanke? Who's going to fine him $10 trillion? How's he going to pay?
So cheer up, Jerome. You might be able to pay your debt to society with a postage stamp... We have in our wallet a 10 trillion dollar note from Zimbabwe. Why not a 10 trillion dollar note from the US? We're not predicting it...we're just trying to keep the young man's hopes up. And you never know...
*** Amid the flotsam and jetsam when Lehman went down was a copy of the Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon. The company must have had it in its library.
We wonder how many Lehman employees read it. And we wonder if Lehman could have saved itself if more of them had. If anything was too big, too successful, too long-lived to fail it was Rome. And yet, down it went.
How many of the hotshots at Lehman Bros suspected...for just one minute...that the Masters of the Universe might someday become its slaves and bootblacks?
*** Yesterday, we went for a drink at the Café Marly at the Louvre. A very nice place to meet someone after work. You sit in the arcades...looking at the glass pyramid in the center.
According to our sources, the Louvre has been targeted by terrorists. They figure they could get a lot of press if they could blow it up and take out some tourists too.
Looking at it as a casual reader of the newspaper, it appears to us that terrorists' damage could be reduced by forceful and determined action on the part of by-standers. Rather than lie down and let yourself get shot, for example, it might be better to mount a counter-attack.
We imagined how we would leap over the ramparts of the Café Marly onto the unsuspecting terrorists below...disarm them...and turn their guns on them. After our recent automatic weapons training by the Chinese army we felt fully qualified to take on a few terrorists.
Fortunately, while we were engaged in this sort of daydreaming, the threat passed. Well-armed security forces took up their positions. No terrorists appeared.
© Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited