X

Sign up for Equitymaster's free daily newsletter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get access to our latest Multibagger guide (2017 Edition) on picking money-making stocks.

This is an entirely free service. No payments are to be made.


Download Now Subscribe to our free daily e-letter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get this complimentary report.
We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
Enron revisited - Views on News from Equitymaster
 
 
  • PRINT
  • E-MAIL
  • FEEDBACK
  • A  A  A
  • Feb 22, 2001

    Enron revisited

    Enron just doesnít go away. When the controversy first came to the fore, we had re-iterated that finally both Enron and the state government would sit across the table, compromise and come to a workable solution, considering the stakes involved for both. It has come to exactly that in the past few months. Here we make an effort to understand the crux of this controversy.

    The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) signed a final power purchase agreement (PPA) with Enron promoted Dabhol Power Corporation in 1995. Under the terms of this agreement, DPC was to build and operate a 2184 MW power plant at Dabhol, Maharashtra in two phases. In return for this MSEB had to make some recurring payments to DPC over a 20-year period.

    The payments were made of two components: fixed payments and variable payments. It is the fixed payments that are the bane of the current controversy.

    As per the terms, the amount of fixed payments is determined by a formula in the agreement and is in no way connected to the amount of power purchased by the MSEB. Under the phase I (740 MW or 6,482 million units), which is already operational, the fixed payment accounts for a significant Rs 10.2 bn per year. The variable payment on the other hand is the actual cost of power purchased from DPC.

    For example, the variable cost per unit (the cost of actual power purchased) stood at Rs 3.72 per unit in November 2000. This doesnít look too high, however, if we add up the average fixed cost per month (Rs 4.08 per unit approximately) and the variable cost (Rs 3.72 per unit), the average cost per MW paid escalates to Rs 7.80.

    But if Phase I is shocking, then letís just take a look at the phase II agreement, which is likely to knock the wind out of the State Governmentís finances. The fixed cost post phase II are likely to triple to Rs 30 bn.

    On the variable cost front, atleast in the phase I, the MSEB is not bound to buy power from Dabhol, subject to certain penalties. MSEB atleast has the option (utilized in January 2001) of purchasing none of it, limiting its losses to a mere Rs 850 m a month on capacity charges.

    But as per the agreement for the phase II (1444 MW or 12650 million units), MSEB is bound to purchase a minimum 90% of the power generated in phase II. Even if MSEB doesnít require so much power, it will have to pay for the 90% power generated anyway. The net payment (at 90% capacity purchase) by MSEB after phase II becomes operational is estimated to be around Rs 96.5 bn ((6482 MU*3.72)+(12650 MU x 90% x 3.72)+ 30 bn) in the very first year. That works out to be roughly Rs 5.40 per unit of power purchased. At todayís prices it is 2.5 times higher than Tata Power Company, which is sitting on excess capacity. BSES power is cheaper by atleast Rs 1.5 per unit that DPCís price. Letís keep in mind that this costing is based on current environment and does not take into account the inflationary pressures and oil price hikes in future.

    Letís forget the costing for a minute and concentrate on the supply needs of Maharashtra State. The demand for power in Maharashtra varies seasonally. Power demand peaks in summers, and over a few hours every morning and evening. On February 15, 2001, the peak demand for power was 10391 MW. On that particular day power supply was sufficient to meet even this peak demand. During the summer, on the other hand, the peak demand is often as high as 11,600 MW. Supply is then insufficient at peak hours, and MSEB resorts to load shedding.

    Thus Maharashtra does suffer from power shortages, but only during certain seasons, and only for a few hours a day. These shortages are best met by peak load plant (one that can be switched on and off at short notice and thus used during peak hours alone). The DPC plant on the other hand is a base load plant; one which needs to be operated continuously over twenty four hours. Further MSEB has guaranteed 90 percent purchase (of Phase II) throughout the year. So, in order to tide over shortages for a few hours a day in some seasons, MSEB is forced to purchase DPC power, at an exorbhitant rate, for 22 hours a day, all around the year.

    From the above statistics it does look like that the state government and the central government did not apply enough thought to study the viability of the DPC project. Incidentally, the World Bank had refused to fund the same project stating that the project was not financially viable. From the current situation it does look like Enron has the state government hook, line and sinker, but from here on it will not be easy for Enron to get to the Phase II easily.

     

     

    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Enron revisited". Click here!

      
     

    More Views on News

    NTPC: Higher Tax Provision Impacts Profits (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Mar 30, 2017

    NTPC declared results for the quarter ended December 2016. The company reported revenue growth of 10.9% while profits declined by 7.5% YoY.

    Tata Power: Higher regulatory & taxation costs hit bottomline (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Dec 28, 2015

    Tata Power declared its results for the quarter ended September 2015. The company's standalone revenues rose 16.3% YoY. However, net profits declined 9% YoY.

    Tata Power: Higher tax & finance costs hit bottomline (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Oct 6, 2015

    Tata Power declared its results for the quarter ended June 2015. The company's standalone revenues and profits fell by 3% and 5.3% YoY during the quarter.

    More Views on News

    Most Popular

    A 'Backdoor' to Multibaggers: It's Like Investing in Asian Paints Ten Years Ago(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.

    The Most Important Innovation in Finance Since Gold Coins(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Bill connects the dots...between money and growth, real money and real resources, gold and cryptocurrencies...and between gold, cryptocurrencies, and time.

    Signs of Life in the India VIX(Daily Profit Hunter)

    Aug 12, 2017

    The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.

    Bitcoin Continues Stellar Rise(Chart Of The Day)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Bitcoin hits an all-time high, is there more upside left?

    5 Steps To Become Financially Independent(Outside View)

    Aug 16, 2017

    Ensure your financial Independence, and pledge to start the journey towards financial freedom today!

    More
    Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
    Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement.

    LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.

    SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.

    Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
    Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: info@equitymaster.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407
     

    Become A Smarter Investor In
    Just 5 Minutes

    Multibagger Stocks Guide 2017
    Get our special report, Multibagger Stocks Guide (2017 Edition) Now!
    We will never sell or rent your email id.
    Please read our Terms

    TATA POWER SHARE PRICE


    Aug 22, 2017 (Close)

    TRACK TATA POWER

    • Track your investment in TATA POWER with Equitymaster's Portfolio Tracker. Set live price alerts, get research alerts and more. Get access now...
    • Add To MyStocks

    TATA POWER 8-QTR ANALYSIS

    Detailed Quarterly Results With Charts

    COMPARE TATA POWER WITH

    MARKET STATS