How often have you heard statements that go something like 'Stocks have returned a fabulous x% per annum over the last x years'. 'Stocks' in the above sentence is at various times readily replaced by any other asset class like gold, real estate, silver etc. Specific companies too find themselves a part of such descriptions about the returns their stocks have given over the last 1, 3 or 5 years. Yes, this is one very ubiquitous exercise that is used across financial markets to calculate the 'returns of an asset class', or the 'returns of a stock'. More so, what is tacitly implied is that these returns are cast in stone and one can reasonably expect it to produce similar returns in the future too.
Lest we fall prey to Bertrand Russell's wise quote "Most people would rather die than think: many do", let's give the above popular methodology of calculating the general 'returns' inherent in an asset class some thought.
The calculation of your return on an investment, especially when it comes to various asset classes, is a tricky affair. More specifically, returns are calculated by dividing the current price (numerator) by the price when we made the investment (denominator).
Thus, what happens is that in many situations, the factors affecting the price of that investment at those two different points in time have an overriding impact on the performance of the investment. To the extent that the particular asset class by itself (the actual change in its intrinsic worth) is sometimes rendered almost irrelevant.
An example should make things more clearer -
Absolute Return | Compounded Annual Return | |
Over last 1 year | 218% | 218% |
Over last 2 years | 54% | 24% |
Over last 3 years | 8% | 3% |
Over last 4 years | 30% | 7% |
Over last 5 years | 99% | 15% |
Over last 6 years | 176% | 18% |
Over last 7 years | 183% | 16% |
Over last 8 years | 146% | 12% |
Over last 9 years | 62% | 6% |
Over last 10 years | -46% | -6% |
Over last 11 years | 513% | 18% |
Over last 12 years | 3596% | 35% |
The above is a tabulation of the returns that you would be fetching today if you would have bought the stock of India's third largest IT company Wipro at different points of time in the past.
So if you were told that the stock of Wipro would have fetched you a return of 99% over the last 5 years, of what relevance would that piece of information be to you? Does it symbolise the returns one can expect from Wipro over the next 5 years? Does it reflect the inherent strength of the company Wipro? Does it reflect how business has been for Wipro over the last 5 years? Does it reflect the quality of Wipro as an investment?
The answer to all of the above questions would be an emphatic NO. The more alert amongst you might have noticed from the table that depending on whether one is calculating returns for the last 1, 5 or ever 10 years, the 'returns' that Wipro will have given you as an investor will vary greatly.
A similar parallel can be drawn for the calculation of the returns of any asset class. The ultimate point being that there are no returns that are 'inherent' in any asset class (implying returns which can be automatically expected to be achieved in future too). They are more a factor of the valuations that are prevalent at the time of investment and the long term fundamentals of the asset class under consideration. Hence, the next time someone tells you that equities have returned so-and-so percent returns over the last 5 years, you know what to make out of it.
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Do equities always give you 20% returns per year?". Click here!
2 Responses to "Do equities always give you 20% returns per year?"
Manu
Feb 24, 2010Moral of the story
1. To make any asset class look under or over valued, all you need to do is to take an appropriate start and end year (like you guys do so often when talking about gold).
2. The best times to buy are the ones that were filled with the most pessimism - like the tech bubble bursting and the aftermath of the 9/11 event, or the 2009 financial meltdown. ANY asset class bought at that time, with reasonably good management and cash flow, would do quite fine.
3. Analysts and recommendation websites like yours, without fail, do well on ALL their recommendations made at the time of a depression/pessimism, and not-so-well on recos made at a high time.
And finally, Buffett has had a 20%+ record for over 40 years with Berkshire. Moreover, he had a 30%+ record for his initial 10+ years prior to the Berkshire chapter of his life.
Ergo, the best asset in the world is an A or B class share of Berkshire Hathaway. That way, you will make the best money-maker in the world work for you. Buy it as a SIP at some regularity.
PersonalFN explains whether the second wave of COVID-19 infections impact your mutual fund investments.
This ignored sector could deliver big short-term profits.
A tiny chemical company, started in the Licence Raj era, is a great example of a new wealth creating opportunity.
PersonalFN's analysis on the features and performance of Mirae Asset Tax Saver Fund.
The Indian government recently announced cut backs on crude oil imports from Saudi Arabia. Does this change our crude oil trading blueprint. Find out...
More Views on NewsIn this video, I'll tell you why I am recommending caution in the market at this time.
A tiny chemical company, started in the Licence Raj era, is a great example of a new wealth creating opportunity.
In this video I'll show you exactly how I go about picking stocks for trading.
100 baggers of the last decade share this common trait. Here's how to use it to nail future multibaggers.
More
VLR
Mar 2, 2010Spot on Manu