Banking: Budget pros and cons - Views on News from Equitymaster

Helping You Build Wealth With Honest Research
Since 1996. Try Now

  • MyStocks

MEMBER'S LOGINX

     
Login Failure
   
     
   
     
 
 
 
(Please do not use this option on a public machine)
 
     
 
 
 
  Sign Up | Forgot Password?  

Banking: Budget pros and cons

Mar 5, 2001

The current budget had the maximum announcement for the banking sector. Overall, the changes proposed by the Finance Bill, 2001 are positive for the banking and financial services sector as it aims to improve asset quality, provide more freedom & autonomy in the functioning of banks and move to reduce interest rates. We present here changes announced in the budget for the sector with impact analysis.

    Positives for the sector:

    1.  Reduction in tax rate:
    The tax on distribution of dividend has been reduced from 20% to 10%. Further, removal of surcharge (10%) will contribute in enhancing banks' profit growth as analysed in the following table.

    (Rs m) No. of Current Savings per share New % addition
      shares (m) EPS (Rs) Dividend tax Corporate tax EPS (Rs) to profits
    HDFC Bank 243 8.6 0.2 0.5 9.26 7.7%
    ICICI Bank 197 5.3 0.2 0.2 5.67 7.0%
    SBI 526 40.4 0.6 1.5 42.46 5.1%
    Bank of India 639 2.2 0.1 0.2 2.53 14.8%
    ICICI 785 15.4 0.6 0.2 16.20 5.2%
    HDFC 119 39.6 1.2 0.6 41.34 4.4%

    2. Cut in small saving interest rates:
    A 1% to 1.5% interest rate cut in small savings indicates diversification of funds towards the banking sector. Rate cut in small savings is positive for banks as they normally maintain a high rate of interest on deposits in order to match the returns offered by the government to the small savers. Also, relatively high interest rates on NSC and on PPF prevented banks from lowering term deposit rates. A rate cut in small saving rate is positive for banks as now they will be able to reduce their deposit rates, which could lead to a marginal improvement in their interest spread. Banks are also facing stiff competition from mutual funds in re-pricing the deposit rates. Lower interest rates regime will now create an equitable climate for bank deposits.

    3. More autonomy:
    With the removal of banking service recruitment board, individual banks can now have autonomy to recruit employees for the bank. This is likely to enhance the skill level in banks and will also bring operating efficiencies. This could be considered as a stepping stone for divestment of the public sector banks.

    4. Boost NPL recovery:
    Greater emphasis is given on recovery of non-performing loans (NPLs). Number of debt recovery tribunals (DRTs) to be increased from 22 to 29 to facilitate speedy recovery of dues of banks and financial institutions (FIs). Net NPL for the banking system is down to 7.4% in March '00 (from 14.5% in March '94). The measures initiated will lead to further improvement in the quality of assets for the banking sector.

    5. Repealing SICA:
    This will facilitate recovery of bad debts by banks and FIs, having a positive impact on their NPAs. Further, introduction of a legislation to facilitate foreclosure and enforcement of securities, in cases of default will enable institutions to realize their dues.

The cut in bank rate a few days ago led to some banks affecting a cut in their PLRs but most banks refrained, as they could not reduce the deposit rate. Such an act of reduction in the lending rates would have put further pressure on the already strained margins. However, this will lead to an increase in the value of bank's investment portfolios and present an opportunity to book profits.

    Negatives for the sector:

    1. TDS on deposits:
    Currently if the interest on deposits exceeds Rs 10,000, tax at the rate of 10% is deducted. The government has now reduced this limit to Rs 2,500. This may lead to further splitting of deposits and some flight of deposits away from the banking system. With the lowering of dividend tax on mutual funds to 10% their relative attractiveness has also increased. Investors could divert their funds from fixed deposits to mutual funds to save tax.

    2. Reduction in limit u/s 80L:
    Tax exemption limit of Rs 12,000 on interest on fixed deposits has been reduced to Rs 9,000. This is likely to have a negative impact on inflow of retail deposits to the banks. Investors may shift to other competing products like debt mutual funds.

    3. Imposition of service tax:
    Most of the following specified services do not form a large proportion of the business on banks.

    • Financial leasing including equipment leasing and hire purchase by a body corporate.
    • Credit card services.
    • Merchant banking services.
    • Securities and forex broking.
    • Asset management, portfolio management, mergers & acquisition, pension fund management, custodial depository and trust services (excluding cash management).
    • Provision and transfer of financial information and data processing.

    As a result imposition of 5% service tax is not expected to impact their bottomline in a significant manner. For ICICI and Kotak Mahindra, leasing service is reasonably large. However, the service tax is unlikely to impact volumes. It is not likely to have major impact on their earnings, as it will be passed on to customers.

      1. Insurance of Kisan credit cards:
      This will be negative for state-owned banks like SBI as they will be bearing the burden of insurance premium. However, this negative is heavily outweighed by the above-mentioned positives from the budget.

      2. Clarification on VRS amortisation:
      A new section, 35 DDA, has been inserted in the Income Tax Act, which issues clarification on VRS expenditure. The section allows amortisation of VRS expenses over five years beginning from the fiscal year 2002. In other words tax deduction will be allowed only for the one fifth of the total expenditure every year starting from fiscal year 2002 and not before that. Banks, which had intended to charge their VRS expenses at one go may now wish to write them off over five years for tax benefits. Banks will not be able to realize the tax benefits in one year, which will effectively increase the time value of benefits. Had the banks charged off the expenses in the current year, the visibility of savings in wage cost and thereby profitability would have been better from next year.


Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Banking: Budget pros and cons ". Click here!

  

More Views on News

How the YES Bank Collapse Unfolded - 10 Points (Sector Info)

Mar 9, 2020

A timeline of how YES Bank went from a stock market darling to a pariah.

Today's Stock Market Crash: 10 Points (Sector Info)

Mar 6, 2020

Top factors that dragged the markets lower today.

More Views on News

Most Popular

Why We Picked This Small-cap Stock for Our Hidden Treasure Subscribers (Profit Hunter)

Sep 17, 2020

This leading household brand will profit big time in a post covid world.

My Top Stock to Buy in this Market Selloff (Profit Hunter)

Sep 22, 2020

The recent correction offers a great opportunity to buy this high conviction smallcap stock.

What Do the Charts Say About Buying Smallcaps Now? (Fast Profits Daily)

Sep 18, 2020

Everyone seems to be excited about buying smallcaps now...but is it the right thing to do? What do the charts tell us? Find out in this video...

How Much Money Do You Need to Be a Professional Trader? (Fast Profits Daily)

Sep 17, 2020

In this video I'll answer a question I get asked often: How much capital do I really need to trade the markets for a living? Let's find out...

More

Covid-19 Proof
Multibagger Stocks

Covid19 Proof Multibaggers
Get this special report, authored by Equitymaster's top analysts now!
We will never sell or rent your email id.
Please read our Terms

S&P BSE BANKEX


Sep 25, 2020 (Close)

COMPARE COMPANY

MARKET STATS