Apr 18, 2011|
SKF vs FAG: Bearings biggies face off (Part III)
In the previous article, we discussed the topline trend of the two largest bearing manufacturers viz. SKF India and FAG Bearings. We will now focus on how their profitability has been over the past few years.
Let us consider operating performance first. As shown in the chart below, FAG's operating margins have remained consistently higher than that of SKF's over the past five years. Both the companies suffered a margin hit in 2009 but even then, FAG's margins came in higher than its counterpart. But the picture reverses if one considers the CAGR (compounded average annual growth rate) in operating profit. Between CY05 and CY10, SKF's operating profits have grown at a CAGR of 22%, slightly higher than FAG's 18%. This is because SKF has been able to keep its margins intact for both the years under consideration. FAG, on the other hand, has witnessed a slight contraction for the same time period.
Both the players are also different in the way the operating margins are composed. For SKF, margin of traded goods is on the higher side than that of bearings manufactured in house (margins of traded goods take into account only purchase and sale of traded goods). But in the case of FAG, margins for in house products have been higher for most of the years under consideration. This perhaps points towards the fact that while SKF imports most of the high value add products; FAG manufactures some of it in house.
Let us now move on to net profit margins. While FAG had an edge over SKF on the operating margin front, the differential narrows down a bit by the time the net profit figures are reached. This could be attributed to slightly lower depreciation charges of SKF and absence of any extraordinary losses. However, on account of better performance at the operating level, FAG still noses ahead of SKF with an average net profit margin of around 12% between CY06 and CY10. The same for SKF came in the region of 8%. CAGR wise, SKF's profit growth at 22% between CY05 and CY10 comes in slightly better than FAG's 20% during the same period.
To conclude, yet again, there was very little to choose between the two on the profitability parameters as only a few percentage points separated them.
It will be interesting to see what will be the result like when we compare the capital efficiency of SKF and FAG in our next article in the series.
More Views on News
Mar 1, 2017
Atul Auto has reported a 11.2% YoY decline in the topline while the bottomline has declined by 23% YoY.
Nov 22, 2016
Bharat Forge has announced its financial results for the second quarter of the financial year 2016-17 (2QFY17). During the quarter, revenues declined by 20.1% YoY and net profits declined by 26.3%.
Oct 28, 2016
Good show amid the broad based recovery
Oct 4, 2016
Equitymaster analyses Initial Public Offering (IPO) of Endurance Technologies Limited
Sep 14, 2016
Should you subscribe to GNA Axle IPO?
More Views on News
Aug 10, 2017
Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.
Aug 8, 2017
'Yes, it looks like a bubble. And, yes, it's like buying a lottery ticket. But there's something happening that has never happened before. It's an evolutionary leap in money itself.'
Aug 8, 2017
Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...
Aug 12, 2017
The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.
Aug 10, 2017
Bitcoin hits an all-time high, is there more upside left?
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: email@example.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407