May 20, 2000|
Need for a sensible policy framework ...
The textile industry basically has two strands: natural and synthetic. While cotton is a natural
fibre synthetic fibres comprise polyester, acrylic, nylon or viscose (which gets classified as a
cellulosic fibre). Though the world over it is the synthetic textiles (particularly polyester)
which forms a major part of the industry's turnover, in India the ratio is still skewed towards
cotton. Infact, the proportion of cotton textiles is around 65%, though polyester seems to have
caught on in recent times.
The cotton textile segment was the one segment where India traditionally had a competitive
advantage. This was primarily because the cotton production in India is the fourth highest in the
world after China, USA, and the CIS countries. However, the policy framework that the government
imposed on the industry put paid to the competitiveness of the industry particularly in the
This was because the government reserved the weaving and processing operations for the small
sector. (Raw cotton goes through a process of ginning after which it is spun into yarn, woven
into a fabric and processed into garments.) Thus composite mills (which had spinning, weaving and
processing under one roof) were prevented from expanding their weaving and processing operations.
This had the effect of rendering quite a few of the composite mills unviable since they could not
expand their weaving operations to match the expansion in spinning. (It also led to the emergence
of specialised spinning mills.) This was exacerbated by the excise evasion done by the small
scale powerlooms which affected the competitive advantage of composite mills. The textile strike
in Mumbai in the early eighties further crippled the composite mills, which were primarily based
Now the wheel has come the full circle. With woven cotton fabrics and woven knitted goods among
the items that have to opened up to international competition under the WTO agreement by April
2001 and the dereservation of these items from the small scale sector, the futility of the
government imposed segregation is clearly apparent. The present government appointed a panel
under comprising Nusli Wadia and Ratan Tata to suggest ways to revive the textile industry. The
group has proposed simpler procedures for relocation, de-reservation of the knitting and
processing segments of the industry (which would help India compete in post-WTO regime) and
formulation of policies to encourage consolidation of the fragmented units.
Another area where a distorted policy framework has affected the competitiveness of the industry
is in the trade policies. The government imposed a ceiling on the export of yarn of 100 m kgs.
per annum in the early nineties. This restriction did not apply to the exports from 100% Export
Oriented Units. This led to a rash of new export oriented units at a capital cost of around
25,000 per spindle almost 35% of which was for setting up infrastructural facilities. Had the
ceiling not been applied it was quite possible that many existing spinning units could have
modernised their spindleage and saved on the extra capital cost.
Yet another irrational restriction the government has imposed on an ad-hoc basis from time to
time is the banning of exports of raw cotton. This was done ostensibly on the ground that the
exports of the higher value added yarn need to be boosted. A better way however could have been
to take steps to improve the productivity of raw cotton itself and allow the imports of raw
cotton so that the cotton growers have a window of opportunity and the yarn manufacturers could
also be free to import.
Coming to polyester, the segment is now witnessing a consolidation with the largest manufacturer
Reliance Industries taking over the uneconomical capacities of JK group's Orissa Synthetics, RPG
group's India Polyfibres, Vijaypat Singhania's Raymond Synthetics, the Thapar group company JCT's
polyester division and lately DCL Polyester.
All these plants were set up during the license raj when diversification into polyester was the
surest way of earning super profits. However, except for Reliance, which backward integrated into
purified terephthalic acid and mono ethyl glycol and further into paraxylene and at onetime was
the supplier to almost all the units it has now taken over, none of which had the wherewithal to
grow to a global player.
While large parts of the polyester segment of the industry have gone under in part due to the
industry's own misjudgments, the fact remains that the cotton mills can be excused if they were
to look askance at the government's past policies which affected their segment.
More Views on News
Aug 11, 2016
Grasim's revenues and profits report strong growth during the quarter ended June 2016.
May 9, 2016
Grasim's revenues and profits report stellar growth during the quarter ended March 2016.
Feb 4, 2016
Grasim's revenues and profits report impressive growth during the quarter ended December 2015.
More Views on News
Aug 7, 2017
The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.
Aug 4, 2017
The small-cap space is full of small players that are clear proxies to great growth stories and Indian megatrends.
Aug 8, 2017
Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...
Aug 12, 2017
The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.
Aug 7, 2017
Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: email@example.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407