Sign up for Equitymaster's free daily newsletter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get access to our latest Multibagger guide (2017 Edition) on picking money-making stocks.

This is an entirely free service. No payments are to be made.

Download Now Subscribe to our free daily e-letter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get this complimentary report.
We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
Turnover tax and you - Views on News from Equitymaster
  • E-MAIL
  • A  A  A
  • Jul 13, 2004

    Turnover tax and you

    Budget 2004-05 and its proposals have largely gone down well with most people. However, the fact remains that there were, are and will always be certain issues, which would face opposition from various factions of the industry/society in every budget. This time around, one issue that has clearly stood out and overshadowed other budget proposals is the turnover tax issue (securities transaction tax as put by the Finance Minister (FM)).

    It must be noted that on the Budget day, as soon as the FM announced the levying of the 0.15% transaction tax, Indian stock markets cracked by 150 points (intra-day). It was only after certain clarifications that were made by market watchdog, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), that markets staged a sharp comeback the following day. So, what is this turnover tax all about? Why has it been levied and what is the impact of this on retail investors?

    The turnover tax, in simple terms, is basically a certain amount of tax to be paid by the buyer of a security. The amount, as mentioned earlier, is 0.15% of the transaction value (shares in quantity x price per share). The purpose of this tax is to partially counter the loss of revenues from the government's proposed reduction of short-term capital gains tax (STCG) to 10% and exempting long-term capital gains (LTCG) from the taxation purview, among others. By proposing the two capital gains taxation measures, the FM has tried to bring our country at par with many other economies where largely similar taxation policies apply, an example being the much-touted Mauritius. Further, by making LTCG tax-free, it is an attraction for the massive US pension funds, which get similar treatment in their home country. Also, this (no LTCG tax) would (probably) lead to investors taking a longer-term view towards equities, thus insulating themselves from the day-to-day stock market volatility, which more often than not puts their capital at risk.

    With the turnover tax being seemingly a good move by the FM, there is already a lot of criticism surrounding the proposal. While the FM has indicated that there are numerous examples of the success of the turnover tax, people opposing the same have managed to throw around examples of countries (like Japan) where the turnover tax has actually been a dampener for the stock markets. In the Indian context, amongst the various arguments supporting the anti-turnover tax lobby is the fact that the imposition of the turnover tax will have an adverse impact of the liquidity (volumes) in the equity markets. The long-term investors are going to be the biggest beneficiaries of this new regime and hence logically only the traders or arbitrageurs are complaining. This is owing to the fact that over 3/4th of the daily volume on the Indian stock exchanges is accounted for by day traders and arbitrageurs, who operate on nominal margins. Thus, the implementation of this tax would kill their very incentive to trade, which would consequently be reflected in the stock markets volumes dwindling.

    However, at this juncture, while we need to remember similar arguments, with respect to volumes, were brought forward at the time of doing away with the 'Badla' system and reducing the settlement period to T+2 system, what has been observed over time is that the markets tend to comfortably adapt to the changed environment.

    Further, another important issue to be considered here is what needs to be given priority, speculation (which would get affected by the turnover tax) or cultivating 'investment' type behaviour in our markets (as is indicated by lower tax on capital gains). Also, it must be noted that while the FM has accepted reconsideration of the turnover tax, provided the anti-turnover tax lobby comes with alternative solution to generating similar revenues from capital markets. However, there needs to be a debate on whether the current or the proposed structure will be best suited for both the government as well as the investors. In this article let us take a look at possible scenarios as to how investors would be affected by the new regime.

    Achieving a break-even…
    Current Proposed
    Buy Sell Buy Sell
    Transaction value (Rs) 10,000 10,109 10,000 10,127
    Brokerage @ 0.5% 50 51 50 51
    Proposed turnover tax @ 0.15% - - 15 -
    Service Tax (@ 8% and 10%) 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.1
    Proposed cess @ 2% - - 0.4 0.1
    Total transaction cost (Rs) 54.0 54.6 70.4 55.8
    Gross short-term capital gains 109   127  
    (Less) Both sides transaction costs 109   126  
    Net short-term capital gains 0   1  
    Short-term capital gains tax 30%   10%  
    Net gains to investor (Rs) 0.3   0.7  

    The above table shows the current and the proposed structure of a stock market trade and what level of gross returns (excluding all costs) would lead to the investor achieving break-even. As can be seen above, in the current structure, with brokerage assumed at 0.5% of the transaction value (each side) and service tax @ 8% (each side), the total transaction (buying and selling) costs comes to Rs 109 (rounded off). Thus, in order to recover his costs and achieve break-even, the investor needs to sell his holdings at atleast 1.1% higher price than the purchase price.

    However, in the proposed structure, with the additional service tax (@ 10%), education cess (@ 2%) and the turnover tax (@ 0.15% of transaction value), in order to achieve break-even, the investor needs to sell his securities at atleast 1.3% over his acquisition price. Thus considering this, an investor is clearly at a disadvantage in the new structure. Note: In both the cases above, the break-even points would vary depending on the brokerage costs.

    Relative gains…
    Current Proposed
    Buy Sell Buy Sell
    Transaction value (Rs) 10,000 10,188 10,000 10,188
    Brokerage @ 0.5% 50 51 50 51
    Proposed turnover tax @ 0.15% - - 15 -
    Service Tax (@ 8% and 10%) 4.0 4.1 5.0 5.1
    Proposed cess @ 2% - - 0.4 0.1
    Total transaction cost (Rs) 54.0 55.0 70.4 56.1
    Gross short-term capital gains 188   188  
    (Less) Both sides transaction costs 109   127  
    Net short-term capital gains 79   61  
    Short-term capital gains tax 30%   10%  
    Net gains to investor (Rs) 55.3   55.3  

    However, the above is a very micro scenario considering that an investor will be just wanting to recover his costs, which is definitely not the actual case. Assuming that India is a growth story and an investor holds his investments for a relatively longer period of time (but less than one-year), the turnover tax picture turns favourable, giving the FM the upper hand.

    As can be seen in the table above, when the relative gains in the two structures are compared (all previous assumptions remaining constant), an investor would earn similar net gains (after factoring in the costs under both the structures) if he books his profits at a 1.9% higher price than his acquisition cost. But this is just one-half of the story.

    The 'big' plus point here is when gains are over 2% (at the gross level). Just to put things in perspective, for a moment, let us assume that the gross returns for an investor are 5%. In this situation, while his net gains (after meeting all expenses) would be 2.7% (on transaction value) in the current scenario, the same would be higher at 3.3% in the proposed scenario (thanks to the reduction in STCG tax to 10%). Further, if the gross returns were 10% higher, the net gains would improve from 6.2% to 7.8%! This is the 'big' plus point that we were talking about in the proposed structure. While we have only highlighted short-term scenarios, looking at the same we can conclude that for long-term investors (holding period of over one year) the benefits would be even larger due to no LTCG tax.

    Thus, to conclude, while we agree that there are various arguments against the implementation of this tax like stock market volumes getting affected, additional cost burden (irrespective of the investor making profits/losses on his investment) and the day traders, jobbers and arbitrageurs getting affected, the larger picture seemingly appears to be more lucrative. Remember, while the FM has agreed to reduce the turnover tax (if other alternatives are provided), it needs to be remembered that the alternative way out could be detrimental to the larger interest of investors.



    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Turnover tax and you". Click here!


    More Views on News

    How to Ride Alongside India's Best Fund Managers (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Jun 10, 2017

    Forty Indian investing gurus, as worthy of imitation as the legendary Peter Lynch, can help you get rich in the stock market.

    You've Heard of Timeless Books... Ever Heard of Timeless Stocks? (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 19, 2017

    Ever heard of Lindy Effect? Find out how you can use it to pick timeless stocks.

    Why NOW Is the WORST Time for Index Investing (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 18, 2017

    Buying the index now will hardly help make money in stocks even in ten years.

    Trump Takes a Beating (Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 18, 2017

    Donald J Trump, a wrasslin' fan, took a 'Holy Sh*t!' blow on Tuesday.

    How To Read Your Mutual Fund Account Statement Correctly (Outside View)

    Aug 17, 2017

    PersonalFN simplifies the mutual fund account statement for you.

    More Views on News

    Most Popular

    Demonetisation Barely Made Any Difference to Tax Collections(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 7, 2017

    The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.

    A 'Backdoor' to Multibaggers: It's Like Investing in Asian Paints Ten Years Ago(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.

    Should You Invest In Bharat-22 ETF? Know Here...(Outside View)

    Aug 8, 2017

    Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...

    Signs of Life in the India VIX(Daily Profit Hunter)

    Aug 12, 2017

    The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.

    7 Financial Gifts For Your Sister This Raksha Bandhan(Outside View)

    Aug 7, 2017

    Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...

    Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
    Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement.

    LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.

    SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.

    Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
    Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: info@equitymaster.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407

    Become A Smarter Investor In
    Just 5 Minutes

    Multibagger Stocks Guide 2017
    Get our special report, Multibagger Stocks Guide (2017 Edition) Now!
    We will never sell or rent your email id.
    Please read our Terms


    Aug 18, 2017 (Close)