Sep 5, 2007|
Media: Demystifying the 'CAS' order...
The regulator for the media sector, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had announced its tariff order for pay channels to be implemented in CAS* notified areas, which got effective from 31st December 2006. This order intended to increase the affordability of cable television services, besides improving the quality of transmission.
*Under Conditional Access System (CAS), the cable operator installs a STB (Set Top Box) at the subscriber's end. This enables the viewer to choose the channels he wishes to view, increases the number of channels that can be transmitted and improves picture quality.
What's in it forů
Local cable operators: The Local Cable Operators (LCOs) resort to the unhealthy practice of under reporting their subscribers. On the implementation of CAS a subscriber management system at the MSO's facility will ascertain subscriber volume. Thus the LCOs will not be able to under-declare subscribers and revenues. However, the implementation of CAS would change the distribution structure. The share of the local cable operators in subscription revenues would reduce from 80% to 25%. Thus while in the short-run the revenues of the LCOs will be badly hit, in the long run they may benefit due to the increase in average revenue per user (ARPU) as various value added services are provided to the viewers.
Broadcasters: The share of the broadcasters in subscription revenues would increase from 15% to 45% post CAS implementation. Thus the broadcasters revenues will increase substantially going forward reducing their dependence on advertisement as a major source of revenue. However the price cap of Rs 5 per channel per subscriber per month does not bode well for the broadcasters, particularly the niche channels such as TV 18, and sports channels such as Star Sports, ESPN. We believe that viewers interested in financial news would be willing to pay much more than Rs 5 per month for CNBC TV 18 as their monthly expenditure on financial newspapers may be greater than Rs 50. Similarly, sports enthusiasts would also be willing to pay more for viewing live sports events. This will reduce the ability of the channels to spend on content. Thus we believe that the price cap is too low and may be revised upwards in the future. The viewers will be able to choose the channels they wish to view so the broadcasters would need to improve the quality of their programming so that they are able to maintain their viewership ratings. Thus in the short run the broadcasters will loose out as at present their subscription rates are higher. However, in the long run they will benefit as the declaration of subscribers by local cable operators will increase and the price cap may be revised upwards.
Consumers: At present the viewers do not have the choice to choose the channels they wish to view. So a viewer residing in Western India may not be interested in viewing a Tamil channel but he is still offered this channel by the local cable operator. Under this order all pay channels have to be compulsorily offered on an individual basis. Besides, there is a ceiling on the maximum retail price of any pay channel, whether new or existing, of Rs 5 per channel per subscriber per month (excluding taxes). Thus this order will enable the viewers to choose the channels they wish to view helping them to reduce their monthly cable bills. Further, as per this order, the local cable operator will have to offer minimum of 30 Free To Air channels at Rs 77 per month. With this, many consumers whose monthly cable bills are up to Rs 300 currently may see their expenses reduce substantially and this proposition could make the process more acceptable to them, notwithstanding the STB cost.
We believe that the order, while on one hand plays the role of making the television media sector more organized and regulated, it also aligns the business model of domestic players with that of their global counterparts.
More Views on News
Aug 14, 2017
The management believes that GST will aid the advertising spends in the long-run.
Apr 26, 2017
Should you subscribe to the IPO of S Chand and Company Limited?
Jun 21, 2017
Should one subscribe to the IPO of GTPL Hathway Ltd?
Aug 1, 2016
Zee Entertainment has announced its results for the first quarter of the financial year 2016-17 (1QFY17). The company has reported 18.5% YoY growth in sales and a 13.7% YoY growth in profit after tax.
Feb 3, 2016
Zee Entertainment has announced the third quarter results of financial year 2015-2016 (3QFY16). While the topline grew by 17% YoY, bottomline fell 11% YoY during the quarter.
More Views on News
Aug 10, 2017
Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.
Aug 8, 2017
'Yes, it looks like a bubble. And, yes, it's like buying a lottery ticket. But there's something happening that has never happened before. It's an evolutionary leap in money itself.'
Aug 8, 2017
Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...
Aug 12, 2017
The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.
Aug 10, 2017
Bitcoin hits an all-time high, is there more upside left?
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407