Sep 30, 2003|
Divestment: Weighed down
Divestment has been one of the key issues over the last decade for the Indian government. The past (and present) governments have been consistently looking at disposing off their stakes in various companies – majority of which are loss making. However, their efforts at either to turn them profitable or to divest them have been in vain. In this article, we look at how has the government fared in its efforts to ‘get rid’ of PSUs and what has been obstructing their efforts at going ahead with divestments.
The unsuccessful efforts of the government at divesting PSUs can be gauged from the table below:
* To date
||Actual as % of Budgeted
Looking at the above table and in the wake of the continuing setbacks that the divestment process has been facing, the government is likley to miss its target of garnering Rs 780 bn from divestment proceeds budgeted in the Tenth Plan period (2002-07).
However, what has been impeding the divestment process? India has 250 PSUs spread across various sectors, largely in the manufacturing segment. Out of these 250, around 50% are loss making. The loss-making status is one of the key reasons, which has affected the government’s efforts at meeting its budgeted targets, as buyers are difficult to come by. However, apart from this, there are various other factors also, which create a hindrance for the divestment process to gather steam. Some of them have been listed below:
Prior to the divestment, loss-making PSUs have to undergo a complete financial restructuring so as to make them saleable. But the Government seems to be hesitant on this front, as it requires huge expenditure to bring these PSUs back on track, which is a big task for the Central and State governments considering their cash-strapped positions and the huge deficits they are currently running.
Moreover, there is always the uncertainty of the divestment not actually going through, even after if the respective ministries approve it. This prevents the government from spending for the revamping/restructuring process (if the company is loss making), as ultimately the status (ownership) of the companies may remain status quo. Just to put things in perspective, the recent postponement of divestment of National Fertilisers Ltd. (NFL) was prima facie due to the fact that the bids received were below the reserve price set by the government. Another example could be Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) whereby the prospective bidders backed out (for various reasons) as the bidding process came near.
Other hindrances like post-closure adjustments, overdue statutory payments and liquidation of old losses, which sometimes exceed sale proceeds, impede divestment. Examples to this would be I.T.D.C. Hotels and Pradeep Phosphates Ltd.
However, while the government continues to face problems on the divestment front, whether it is for the reasons stated above or for reasons like the requirement of Parliamentary approval (e.g. HPCL and BPCL), the fact is that the more the delay in the process, the higher the government tends to lose financially in terms of budgetary support, waiver of loan/interest and guarantees, which the government furnishes on behalf of PSUs.
Moreover, apart from the advantage to the government, change of management is also advisable for the companies being divested and which have the potential to deliver results, albeit under professional management. Some examples, which prove this point, are:
Post the acquisition of Modern Foods India Ltd. (MFIL) by HLL, the former has registered an improved performance as its annual sales growth has increased by 80%.
In the case of Pradeep Phosphates Ltd., the monthly losses of Rs 120 m have been drastically controlled to about Rs 30 m and the company hopes to break-even in the current fiscal.
To sum it up, we feel that divestment is in the interest of not only the government (fiscal position) but also for the companies (performance tends to improve), shareholders (better returns) and common man (tax collections are used more efficiently rather than spending the monies to support the loss making units).
More Views on News
Jul 25, 2017
Equitymaster HQ has been infiltrated. Valuable stock ideas have been leaked. Who's responsible?
May 27, 2017
What happens when minority shareholders are short-changed in the normal course of business?
Feb 15, 2017
PersonalFN believes SEBI has taken a step back-apparently in the admission of it going overboard with the regulations.
Aug 24, 2016
And here's your chance to claim a free copy of this book...
Aug 12, 2016
And Why India's demographic dividend could turn out to be a doubtful debt...
More Views on News
Aug 7, 2017
The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.
Aug 10, 2017
Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.
Aug 8, 2017
Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...
Aug 12, 2017
The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.
Aug 7, 2017
Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: email@example.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407