FMCG: Underdog, but for how long? - Views on News from Equitymaster

Helping You Build Wealth With Honest Research
Since 1996. Try Now

  • MyStocks

MEMBER'S LOGINX

     
Login Failure
   
     
   
     
 
 
 
(Please do not use this option on a public machine)
 
     
 
 
 
  Sign Up | Forgot Password?  

FMCG: Underdog, but for how long?

Dec 31, 2004

Introduction
At the end of 2003, we had remarked that although the FMCG sector under-performed the Sensex, 2004 could be a buoyant demand season for the industry. But 2004 was even more difficult than 2003 for the sector as a whole. While Rs 100 invested in the Sensex towards the end of December 2003 would have yielded the investor Rs 114 by December 27, 2004, an investor in the FMCG index would have lost 4% durig the same period. With the Sensex touching all time highs, the performance is indeed poor!

What was different in 2004 as compared to 2003?
While 2003 was a difficult year owing to sluggish demand, there was expectation that increased agricultural output would lead to favourable demand pick up. But everything changed when detergent and shampoo major, P&G, decided to up its market share in the Indian market. So, they more or less halved prices in these categories and took the battle to market leader, Hindustan Lever. What followed was an unprecedented fall in profitability for detergent and shampoo majors. This of course, had a damaging impact on the sentiment towards the overall FMCG sector.

The laggards…
It is no surpise then that companies like HLL, Henkel and Nirma, that operated in the detergent space were most adversely hit in 2004. While HLL's profits slumped 32% in 9mCY04, Henkel reported a 36% decline during the same period. Food processing major, Nestle, found itself to be part of this pack, owing to its lacklustre domestic performance (up 4% in 9mCY04) and a volatile export performance (down over 9%).

Company Price on
Dec 26, 2003 (Rs)
Price on
Dec 26, 2004 (Rs)
%
Change
52-week
H/L (Rs)
BSE-Sensex 5,699 6,513 14.3% 6,567 / 4,228
S&P CNX Nifty 1,837 2,063 12.3% 2,079 / 1,292
Nirma 500 349 -30.1% 520 / 251
HLL 203 145 -28.6% 218 / 104
Henkel Spic 33 26 -22.7% 35 / 14
Nestle 660 586 -11.2% 720 / 500
Rayban Sun Optics 65 59 -8.9% 68 / 46
Dabur 92 84 -8.7% 98 / 61
Gillette 731 689 -5.7% 769 / 499
Pidilite 396 378 -4.7% 415 / 253

The sector outperformers…
The year belonged to the retailing majors - Pantaloon and Trent. Both outperformed the traditional branded FMCG companies by a significant margin. Pantaloon's successful 'Big Bazaar' retail initiative helped to leapfrog to the top of the investor charts. The company hopes to create 3 m square feet of retail space by FY06 (from 1.1 m square feet in FY04). On the other hand, the Tata Group's retailing arm - Trent - witnessed a significant re-rating towards the second half of the year, owing to its entry in the 'Hyper Mart' form of retailing. The company launched its first hypermarket store (grocery, consumer goods, apparel, other durables) 'Star India Bazaar' in Ahmedabad, Gujarat in October 2004. It is estimated that revenues from this general store model will be far more than what it is deriving from its 'Westside' stores.

Company Price on Dec 26, 2003 (Rs) Price on Dec 26, 2004 (Rs) % Change 52-week H/L (Rs)
BSE-SENSEX 5,699 6,513 14.3% 6,567 / 4,228
S&P CNX NFTY 1,837 2,063 12.3% 2,079 / 1,292
Pantaloon Retail 266 724 172.2% 830 / 218
Trent Limited 293 592 102.1% 631 / 180
Godrej Consumer 174 300 72.2% 303 / 140
Tata Coffee 160 260 62.3% 305 / 115
Marico 119 174 45.5% 189 / 100
Tata Tea 331 480 45.0% 489 / 270
Bata India 68 96 40.7% 98 / 38
Britannia 662 905 36.6% 921 / 538
ITC 976 1,309 34.2% 1,329 / 732
VST Industries 202 245 21.6% 256 / 162
Godfrey Philips 433 505 16.7% 523 / 338
Colgate 158 182 14.7% 186 / 101
P&G 480 545 13.6% 569 / 360
Camlin 86 95 10.0% 108 / 52
GTC 27 29 4.6% 34 / 10
GSK Consumers 325 330 1.5% 349 / 208

Coming to the traditional FMCG companies', smaller-niche companies clearly were the favourites. Companies like Godrej Consumer, that took the lead in setting up capacities in tax-free backward regions, were able to grow profits despite the tough environment. Tata Coffee had a good run owing to the restructuring positives, as well as its decision to sell off the 'Barista' stake. The restructuring benefits and the Tetley global growth helped its parent - Tata Tea, finish among the top performers of the year. Edible oil major, Marico, continued its good run owing to its diversified geographical presence as well as its continued dominance of its key categories.

What to expect?
With two successive years of under performance, there emerges an element of circumspection while building expectations for 2005. Nevertheless, we believe that the pricing environment is gradually improving for detergent companies. While the companies suffered in terms of profitability, the price war did manage to grow volumes in these categories. The companies continue to attack costs by either relocating to tax free zones or looking at various productivity improvement measures.

Another important development that took place in 2004 was that most FMCG majors undertook capacity expansion plans. This has not happened over the past 5 to 7 years. It does point to improved demand expectation by the sector majors. For investors, a key thing to note is that with markets at all time highs and interest rates looking to strengthen, the equity risk profile has increased over the short term. In such a scenario, FMCG is likely to be a good defensive bet. For one, most FMCG companies are operating at zero debt levels. Their cash flows continue to be strong and dividend payouts are encouraging. More importantly, expectations of a demand revival are not factored into most forward projections.

It is a given that the consuming class pie in India is growing. While consumer durables and housing have clearly taken a front seat in the consumption pattern, it is unlikely that the FMCG sector growth will not mirror the GDP growth trend over the long term. The environment will no doubt, continue to be competitive, but volume growth may more than make up for it for stronger companies. 2005 will also bring in the implementation of value added tax (VAT) regime. Though the benefits of this will take a few years to filter in, in the long run, the overall tax structure for these companies will get simplified thereby providing a fillip. Also, the government's decision to allow 100% FDI in single-product retailing (like Lacoste, Tommy Hilfiger) is a sign of better things to come in the long term.

Valuation matrix
Company EPS* P/E Mkt. Cap
/ Sales (x)**
COLGATE 8.6 21.0 2.6
P&G 28.7 19.7 3.1
DABUR 4.2 22.0 1.9
ITC 69.3 18.7 5.0
MARICO 19.9 8.6 1.1
HLL 6.4 22.6 3.1
NESTLE 24.4 24.0 2.6
GSK CONS. 14.8 22.1 1.9
BRITANNIA 73.0 12.7 1.5
PIDILITE 25.8 14.7 1.5
Trent 13.0 44.3 5.0
Pantaloon 11.4 63.6 2.1
*Trailing 12 month EPS, **Audited sales of latest fiscal year


Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "FMCG: Underdog, but for how long?". Click here!

  

More Views on News

Sorry! There are no related views on news for this company/sector.

Most Popular

Why We Picked This Small-cap Stock for Our Hidden Treasure Subscribers (Profit Hunter)

Sep 17, 2020

This leading household brand will profit big time in a post covid world.

My Top Stock to Buy in this Market Selloff (Profit Hunter)

Sep 22, 2020

The recent correction offers a great opportunity to buy this high conviction smallcap stock.

Can the Nifty Fall to 10,200? (Fast Profits Daily)

Sep 24, 2020

The Nifty has reached an important support level today. If it breaks then we could see further downside.

What Do the Charts Say About Buying Smallcaps Now? (Fast Profits Daily)

Sep 18, 2020

Everyone seems to be excited about buying smallcaps now...but is it the right thing to do? What do the charts tell us? Find out in this video...

More

Covid-19 Proof
Multibagger Stocks

Covid19 Proof Multibaggers
Get this special report, authored by Equitymaster's top analysts now!
We will never sell or rent your email id.
Please read our Terms

S&P BSE FMCG


Sep 30, 2020 (Close)

S&P BSE FMCG 5-YR ANALYSIS

COMPARE COMPANY

MARKET STATS