Get More Info

  • Views Search

    Portfolio Tracker
  • : Disinvestment: Lessons from China
  • OUTLOOK ARENA  >>   VIEWS ON NEWS >>  JULY 2, 2004

    Disinvestment: Lessons from China

    After the momentum that the disinvestment process had gained under the aegis of the NDA government, the new UPA government has virtually halted the whole process. The UPA government has actually emphasized that only the non-profitable enterprises would be privatized and the profitable and strategically important state assets would not be sold off. The most crucial reason attributed to the halt in the process is social. There are fears that privatization could lead to large-scale layoffs and no government at the Centre could afford that, especially if Left inclined parties support the government.

    Another argument is, “Why privatize profit making companies in the first place?” In this backdrop we take a look at the restructuring exercise carried out by the communist government in the People’s Republic of China (China). This study assumes importance, firstly due to the presence of a communist government at the helm of affairs and second due to the fact that public sector companies or State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) as they are called in China are a crucial building block of the Chinese society and restructuring of SOEs has been a sensitive issue in the country.

    If one were to take a historical perspective of reforms in China, the market liberalisation process was started in the mid 1980s. At the onset, internal restructuring was the most preferred methods to restructure the ailing and non-profitable SOEs. However, soon the emphasis shifted to the leasing out of SOEs, which could involve recruitment of managers from outside the company. China also experimented with incorporation that eventually led to privatization among the SOEs in the country. Incorporation opened up the possibility of a change in shareholding among SOEs. Initially, shares were sold among the employees, but off late disinvestment to private entities have gathered ground.

    Before we look at the consequences of restructuring on SOEs in China, we will try and understand the ways in which Chinese SOEs were restructured. Below are mentioned the most common restructuring methods employed by the Chinese government.

    Public offering:  This maintained the state ownership on the company but diversified the shareholding among various entities.

    Internal restructuring:  One of the most popular methods of restructuring, which maintained state ownership of assets. This process could involve the breaking up of the company in to smaller units producing different products or setting up of a new entity to just take over owner ship of productive assets. Debt equity swap was also part of the internal restructuring process.

    Bankruptcy and reorganization:  Restructuring could also involve the bankrupt firms being dissolved.

    Employee shareholding:  This has been one of the most popular forms of restructuring employed in China. Being a communist mindset where collective holding of assets was always emphasized, this form of restructuring was popular since the employees were not threatened with retrenchment and hence this was the most socially acceptable restructuring exercise at that point of time.

    Open sale:  This form of restructuring has become more popular in recent years. The firm is openly sold to insiders or outsiders, perhaps through auction. This has been the most radical form of privatization because it can involve the transfer of the firm to a single private owner or a management group.

    Leases:  Under this form of restructuring, the assets of an SOE were leased out. The assets were leased out to legal entities independent of the government or ex-employees who formed their own companies. Leasing is often adopted when the lessee has insufficient financial resources to buy the firm.

    Joint ventures:  Formation of a joint venture or merger falls under this category of restructuring. This type of reform helped the company to obtain long-term access to capital and technology.

    While these have been the ways in which restructuring has been carried out in China, off late, the emphasis has shifted to privatization of assets wherever the situation permits. However, the reality is that the communist government still controls the largest of the SOEs and it is still sometime away from carrying out much needed reforms in the same. However, a financial system ridden with bad loans and lack of means of raising fresh capital has meant that SOE privatization is becoming the imperative. Statistics also point in that direction.

    PRC goverment sources indicate a shift towards privatization as a preferred means of restructuring of an SOE. In 1998, a quarter of the nearly 87,000 SOEs went through one or the other form of restructuring. At that time, between 60%-70% of these enterprises were partially or fully privatized. In 2002, however, nearly 86% of industrial SOEs went through some form of restructuring while 70% of the same had been partially or fully privatized. However, this does not indicate the state of the largest of the SOEs and, to that extent, this data can be misleading. The restructuring process of SOEs in China has been painful for the society but has been beneficial as far as performance of the SOEs are concerned.

    Between 1995 and 2001 the number of state owned and state controlled enterprises fell from 118,000 to 47,000. Consequently total employment in the SOE segment fell by 36 m, which was nearly 15% of urban employment in 2001. Due to the large scale layoffs and further improvement in technology and higher capital inflows SOEs have become more productive. Studies also indicate that the highest improvement in productivity was among entities that have been privatized.

    The objective of this article is not to highlight the success or the failures of the restructuring of SOEs in China, however it certainly is to highlight the fact that out central Asian neighbour is moving towards its objective of industrial reforms aggressively. While it is true that industrial sector reforms are a larger imperative for an economy like China, due to its legacy of large and poorly performing state owned enterprises that contribute a very large part towards the overall industrial output of the country, the need for the same in the Indian context cannot be stressed enough. It is safe to say that our Chinese counterparts have more experience as far as industrial reforms are concerned due to an early start to the economic reforms process in the country. The need of the hour is to learn from the Chinese example and adopt a restructuring/privatization model that best suits India.

  • Get the budget special issue of Money Simplified, our free quarterly publication. Click here!

    Its about selecting the right stock... the right price!

    Equitymaster follows the value-investing approach to selecting stocks for investment. Subscribe to our premium research today!

    More Views on News

    Insider Leaks Equitymaster Stock Picks (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Jul 25, 2017

    Equitymaster HQ has been infiltrated. Valuable stock ideas have been leaked. Who's responsible?

    Raymond and Other 'For Profit' Companies Who Don't Care about Shareholder Returns (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    May 27, 2017

    What happens when minority shareholders are short-changed in the normal course of business?

    Why Commission Driven Model In Mutual Funds Should Be Eliminated... (Outside View)

    Feb 15, 2017

    PersonalFN believes SEBI has taken a step back-apparently in the admission of it going overboard with the regulations.

    This Book Changed How I Looked at the World of Man and Money (Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 24, 2016

    And here's your chance to claim a free copy of this book...

    The Developed World is Dying because of Demographics, Debt, and Deflation (Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 12, 2016

    And Why India's demographic dividend could turn out to be a doubtful debt...

    More Views on News

    Most Popular

    Demonetisation Barely Made Any Difference to Tax Collections(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 7, 2017

    The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.

    A 'Backdoor' to Multibaggers: It's Like Investing in Asian Paints Ten Years Ago(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.

    Should You Invest In Bharat-22 ETF? Know Here...(Outside View)

    Aug 8, 2017

    Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...

    Signs of Life in the India VIX(Daily Profit Hunter)

    Aug 12, 2017

    The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.

    7 Financial Gifts For Your Sister This Raksha Bandhan(Outside View)

    Aug 7, 2017

    Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...


    © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited |
    Why Personalfn? | Why Equitymaster? | Terms of Use | Contact Us | About Us