Of Jaitley, Fiscal Deficit and a 19th Century French Economist - Vivek Kaul's Diary
Free Reports

Of Jaitley, Fiscal Deficit and a 19th Century French Economist

Jan 12, 2016

28

Lawyers who become politicians are extremely eloquent speakers. But do they 'really' mean what they say? Or is it just something that sounds good at a given point of time, like a film dialogue?

The finance minister Arun Jaitley in his maiden budget speech in July 2014 had said: "We need to introduce fiscal prudence that will lead to fiscal consolidation and discipline. Fiscal prudence to me is of paramount importance because of considerations of inter-generational equity. We cannot leave behind a legacy of debt for our future generations. We cannot go on spending today which would be financed by taxation at a future date."

Most governments spend more than what they earn. In order to bridge the gap, they borrow money by selling governments bonds. These bonds are repaid in the years to come. If the government borrows more today, the more it has to repay in the years to come.


Advertisement
  Equitymaster Conference 2016  
23rd January. Mumbai, India
   
  It gives us great pleasure in extending you an invitation to join us at the Equitymaster Conference 2016. This is going to be one of our most important Conferences ever! And I strongly recommend you attend it.

At the Equitymaster Conference, our best ever line up of speakers, starting with Ajit Dayal (Founder, Equitymaster) and Bill Bonner (Founder, Agora Inc.) will aim to address all your questions about the current investment environment, thereby help you in planning your next steps. Including...

»  Where are the stock markets headed?
»  What should be your investment strategy for Indian stocks?
»  Is it finally time to get bullish on real estate?
»  Is the Gold story over?
»  What's next for India's economy, and the Indian Rupee?

Plus, at the Conference you will get an opportunity to rub shoulders with not just our speakers, but also like-minded investors from across India (Last year we welcomed guests from 33 cities, and 3 countries).

So if you are serious about your investments, The Equitymaster Conference 2016 is something you cannot afford to miss. More details about the Conference and our speaker line up are available here.

We suggest you move very fast on this invitation.

Reserve your seat under our 'Early Bird' opportunity!
 

This repayment is carried out of the money the government earns from taxing the future generations. This means that the benefits of borrowing are received by one generation but the debt is repaid by another. And this is why Jaitley talked about "considerations of inter-generational equity". Or so it seemed.

The only way of respecting inter-generational equity is to borrow less today, so that the future generations don't have to repay it, in the days to come. Borrowing less is only possible if the government is spending less today.

In his July 2014 budget speech Jaitley had talked about precisely this. He had said: "Difficult, as it may appear, I have decided to accept this target as a challenge. One fails only when one stops trying. My Road map for fiscal consolidation is a fiscal deficit of 3.6 per cent [of the gross domestic product (GDP)] for 2015-16 and 3 per cent for 2016-17."

Fiscal deficit is the difference between what a government earns and what it spends. This difference is made up through borrowing money by selling government bonds. Hence, a lower fiscal deficit means lower borrowing and in the process the "considerations of inter-generational" equity is take into account.

In the budget speech Jaitley made in February 2015, the considerations of inter-generational equity took a slight backseat. He postponed the achievement of the fiscal deficit target of 3% of the GDP for 2016-2017, by a year.

As he said on that occasion: "Rushing into, or insisting on, a pre-set time-table for fiscal consolidation pro-cyclically would, in my opinion, not be pro-growth. With the economy improving, the pressure for accelerated fiscal consolidation too has decreased. In these circumstances, I will complete the journey to a fiscal deficit of 3% in 3 years, rather than the two years envisaged previously. Thus, for the next three years, my targets are: 3.9%, for 2015-16; 3.5% for 2016-17; and, 3.0% for 2017-18. The additional fiscal space will go towards funding infrastructure investment."

What the government had set out to achieve in a period of two financial years, Jaitley said would now be achieved in three years. This was in February 2015, when the budget for the current financial year 2015-2016 was presented.

In the recent past, there have been news-reports as well as statements which suggest that the government will again postpone, the fiscal deficit targets it had set for itself. "I am not particularly worried about the fiscal deficit target," Jaitley said in early December. A Reuters news-report quotes a senior finance ministry official as saying that the "the minister[i.e. Jaitley] has been advised to increase its fiscal deficit target to 3.7 or 3.9 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) from 3.5 per cent." "The economy is still suffering from slack demand...It needs a conducive fiscal and monetary policy," the official added.

The industrial as well as consumer demand are seeing slow-growth and hence the government should be spending more, and in the process incurring a higher expenditure and a higher fiscal deficit. The higher government expenditure will push up economic growth. This is what the senior finance ministry official meant.

This is something Jaitley has also said recently: "Public investment has been stepped up in the last year and it will continue to remain stepped up... When you fight a global slowdown, public investment has to lead the way."

In a year when the government will have to incur significantly extra expenditure to implement the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission, implement one rank one pension for the armed forces and pay pending, fertilizer and food subsidies, where is the money for public investment going to come from?

It is worth recounting here what the French economist Frederic Bastiat had said in his 1874 book That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen. "In the department of economy, an act, a habit, an institution, a law, gives birth not only to an effect, but to a series of effects. Of these effects, the first only is immediate; it manifests itself simultaneously with its cause-it is seen. The others unfold in succession-they are not seen. It is well for us if they are foreseen."

When we talk about the government abandoning the fiscal deficit target and spending more, this is precisely how things are playing out. The immediate effect or that which is seen is that higher government expenditure will create economic growth in an environment where industrial and consumer demand growth continues to remain slow. This is the effect that is being 'seen'.

But there are other effects which are not being seen. The entire issue about inter-generational equity that Jaitley had talked about in his July 2014, seems to have taken a backseat.

Let's go back a few years in order to understand this point. In 2008-2009, the government spent 51% of what it earned in paying interest on its existing debt and repaying the debt that was maturing. In the aftermath of the financial crisis that started in September 2008, the government increased its expenditure and its fiscal deficit. When the government talked about increased government spending it was only in the context of economic growth. This effect was seen. Nevertheless, increased government spending meant more borrowing. In 2015-2016, the government will spend around 60% of what it earns in paying interest on existing debt and repaying the debt that matures. The higher borrowing of 2008-2009 and the years that followed is now having an impact. This was the effect which was unseen or wasn't foreseen in 2008-2009, when the government decided to spend more. This is what Jaitley meant when he talked about considerations of inter-generational equity.

When one government borrows more it leaves a problem for another government in years to come. Also, as more money goes towards debt servicing it leaves little money for other things, unless more money is borrowed.

Further, the government doesn't have any separate access to borrowings. As economist M Govinda Rao wrote in a recent column in The Financial Express: "This year, the Union government's deficit is set at 3.9%, and with the states together having a deficit of about 2.2%, the aggregate fiscal deficit of the government works out to 6.1%. It is reported that 21 distribution companies are likely to join the UDAY scheme and the deficit on that account could be about 1%." If we were to add all this the real fiscal deficit of the government would come at 7.1% of the GDP. The household financial savings in 2014-2015 stood at 7.5% of GDP.

This means that if the government borrows more it will automatically lead to higher interest rates for everyone else who wants to borrow. When the finance minister talks about public investment and not being bothered about a higher fiscal deficit, these points also need to be 'seen'. Currently, they are not being seen.

As Bastiat put it: "Between a good and a bad economist this constitutes the whole difference-the one takes account of the visible effect; the other takes account both of the effects which are seen and also of those which it is necessary to foresee."

Of course, politicians are in the business of winning elections not in the business of foreseeing or in the business of practicing good economics.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

Mr Trump Has Been Broken August 24, 2017
Kelly, Mattis, McMaster, Cohn, and Mnuchin are in charge. But these Pentagon bureaucrats and Wall Street hustlers may be worse than a loose-cannon president.
Deep State First August 23, 2017
Nowhere was the darkness deeper than in the nation's capital. There, no light shone. No flicker of awareness...observation...learning...or reflection appeared.
A Darkness Is Spreading Across the US August 22, 2017
Today, we are attacked by one preposterous thing after another, each of them even more absurd than the last.
Dear PM Modi, India is Already Land of Self-Employed, and It Ain't Working August 21, 2017
Most Indians who cannot find jobs, look at becoming self-employed.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Of Jaitley, Fiscal Deficit and a 19th Century French Economist". Click here!

8 Responses to "Of Jaitley, Fiscal Deficit and a 19th Century French Economist"

Kumar

Jan 13, 2016

One can notice a trend of criticizing whatever government of the day does by so called intellectuals. However, it is very rare that they provide any constructive feedback/ideas of how to do the same.

Like (1)

Sundaravaradan S

Jan 12, 2016

Hi People,

LOL..!
On one-side we bash the Modi-nomics and on the other side we talk about MODI-fied India...!
We never talked about the Fiscal defecit & other performances of earlier Govts. (Is it because, we know it was WORSE...?). Surely, we can doubt about everything of current govt.; till it is implemented.
Why we never talked about such things of earlier Govt.??!!

A un-biassed writer should talk about both + and - of any issue.
Let us ask International writers about the Strategy of current Indian Govt. vs. previous Govts.
WHICH COUNTRY IS BEST GOVERNED BY GOVT. TODAY, IN THE ENTIRE WORLD? (US, with trillions of Debt? China, with uncontrolled Development? OPEC, with wrong petrol policy? And ISIS issues? or 2016-India, with least-corrupt Ministers..?)

Sure...talk about both sides...!

Like (1)

VIPIN MALHOTRA

Jan 12, 2016

Agree to the concept of "considerations of inter-generational" equity (1) Politicians should be debarred from Finance & Defense ministries only professionals without political affiliation should be selected (2) Government Borrowing should be restricted to say 2-3 % below the Household Savings rate , so all Governments will either promote a healthier Savings rate or borrow less .(3) a CIBIL like score / assessment of Governments must also done and publically announced / published to make them more accountable.(4) Make Government Jobs less lucrative so the private sector gets best talent and actually generates the trade surplus for the country. No government enterprise can run a country it will have to be the private players who will need to generate the multi millions and the crores of jobs that are needed every year.(5) Promote manufacturing from the lowest to the highest level of the value chain over mining of natural resources and Services sectors.

Like (1)

Gadigi Pratapa

Jan 12, 2016

Unless there is a limit imposed by the constitution, except in national emergencies, such extravagant, irresponsible budgeting will not stop. But then again the same parliament has to act to include the limit in the constitution. With the quality of the parliamentarians getting elected this cannot happen. So we are back to square one.

Like (1)

Sanjiv Gupta

Jan 12, 2016

Good article. Well explained.

Like (1)

Ashish chadha

Jan 12, 2016

Very well writte, we were doing a presentation yesterday and we were noting these very points on the deficit. You are so accurate in your observation

Like (1)

Satish Mahajan

Jan 12, 2016

it is very be bored to death for reading all the articles of equitymaster, only drum beating nothing else, leaving this

Like (1)

MN

Jan 12, 2016

Interesting read. However, good to remember that we are always going to be governed by politicians. Even if a politican was an economist before, he would act as a politician.
Then again there are prudent ones and imprudent ones. Ones that care for the nation and ones that for only themselves. Unfortunately only time will tell. One can never predict.

Like (1)
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Of Jaitley, Fiscal Deficit and a 19th Century French Economist". Click here!