Free Reports

Can India Afford a Universal Basic Income?

Jan 27, 2017


In the recent past, there has been a lot of talk around the government providing a universal basic income(UBI) to every Indian. If UBI becomes the order of the day, then the central government will carry out an unconditional income transfer to every Indian, rich or poor, on a periodic basis (perhaps monthly).

The question is can we afford it? The answer seems to be no. This becomes clear from a remark made by the NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Arvind Panagariya, in a recent interview to The Indian Express: "The Tendulkar urban poverty line at 2011-12 prices is Rs 1,000 per person per month. Due to inflation between 2011-12 and now, at today's prices, this sum would be significantly larger. But transferring even Rs 1,000 per month to all Indians would cost Rs 15.6 lakh crore (Rs 1,000 x 12 months x 130 crore people) a year. We simply do not have this magnitude of fiscal resources."

The total expenditure of the Indian government during 2016-2017 has been projected to be at Rs 19.78 lakh crore. Rs 15.6 lakh crore amounts to around 79 per cent of the total expenditure of the Indian government. This makes it unviable. Or so it seems.

The question that crops up here is that why are economists who are recommending UBI, actually recommending it? It doesn't take much Maths to understand that India cannot afford a universal basic income at this point of time.

The economist Pranab Bardhan in a 2011 article in the Economic & Political Weekly, said: "The main question is: if we want it to be universal, can we afford it? Of course the answer depends on the amount to be given out, if it will be a replacement for the existing transfer programmes which have a lot of wastage and misappropriation."

The point being that many of the current subsidy programmes run by the government are excessively leaky. Given this, the subsidies don't reach those that they are meant for. This includes subsidies on rice, wheat, kerosene, sugar, fertilizer etc. In this scenario, it perhaps makes more sense to shutdown these subsidies and handout cash directly to every citizen, who can then spend it the way he or she deems it to be fit.

  The Fight Against BLACK MONEY
Here's What It Means For YOU And YOUR Money...
  The Fight Against BLACK MONEY Modi's move to scrap the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 note could impact YOU more significantly than you think.

We are talking impact on...

YOUR Investments. YOUR Property. Effectively, YOUR Wealth

It's absolutely critical for you to understand completely, and accurately, how this impacts you.

And that's why, we are releasing this special report, which you can claim for FREE. No strings attached.

Go ahead, grab your copy now...And be among the first to know what Modi's fight against black money really means for you...

Download This Special Report Now. It's Free.

As soon as you sign up, You will start recieving Vivek Kaul's Diary,
a Free-for-life newsletter from Equitymaster

NO-SPAM PLEDGE - We will NEVER rent, sell, or give away your e-mail address to anyone for any reason. You can unsubscribe from Vivek Kaul's Diary with a few clicks. Please read our Privacy Policy & Terms Of Use.

The economist Vijay Joshi gets into the actual nitty-gritty of UBI in his book India's Long Road-The Search for Prosperity. He talks about multiple things that will help government raise revenue as well as cut down on expenditure, and in the process, make way for UBI. Let's look at his suggestions.

Joshi talks about a courageous government taxing agricultural incomes and in the process managing to raise 0.5 per cent of the GDP as annual revenue. He also talks about privatising public sector enterprises leading to efficiency grains and helping raise resources of 1 per cent of GDP annually, for the next decade. Over and above this, there are many counterproductive tax exemptions that have been given over the years. Joshi hopes that doing away with these exemptions would help raise revenues by around 1.5 per cent of the GDP per year.

Joshi then recommends the winding up of non-merit subsidies and food subsidies. In total, this would free up resources of at least 10 of the GDP and perhaps up to 12 per cent of the GDP. All this would make UBI viable, feels Joshi.

As he writes: "The most serious non-fiscal problem with transfer schemes is the identification of beneficiaries... Therefore, in my judgement, a universal cash transfer would be the best route to follow. I would therefore recommend the adoption of the scheme... which involves disbursing a 'basic income' of Rs 17,500 per household per year, into the bank accounts of all households."

Transferring money to every household of this country would essentially ensure that the government does not have to figure out who is eligible for the transfer and who is not, a major problem with paying out almost all subsidies.

Assuming five people per household and a population of 130 crore we come up with 26 crore households. Hence, the total bill for universal basic income would work out to around Rs 4.55 lakh crore, at Rs 17,500 per household per year. If the government is able to eliminate other subsidies and at the same time raise revenues through measures like taxing agriculture, then the UBI is very workable.

And given that many existing subsidies are terribly leaky, transferring money directly to citizens and letting them decide what to do with, makes more sense. There is enough research evidence to show that when people (especially women) are given money they tend to use it wisely and don't blow it away on alcohol and tobacco. Also, over a period of time, the overall UBI bill can be brought down by allowing people who do not want a basic income to opt out of it.

The trouble is all this is dependent on the fact whether the government is able to eliminate many subsidies that it currently offers including food subsidies. And that is easier said than done. For an economist, making a calculation, it is easy to assume, remove this subsidy, increase that revenue, and everything falls into place. For a politician, it isn't. And that is where the whole thing starts to unravel.

Let's take consider some of Joshi's recommendations. Take the case of taxing agricultural income. On the face of it, this makes tremendous sense. Nevertheless, which politician would have the balls, to venture into this territory.

Or take the case of selling off public sector enterprises, lock, stock and barrel. No government till date has shown even a remote inclination to do something like that. Or doing away with tax exemptions that favours corporates. While politicians talk about it all the time, nothing seems to happen.

The joker in the pack is doing away with food subsidies. Currently, the government sells rice and wheat at subsidised prices through the fair price shops that make up for the public distribution system all over the country. The government acquires rice and wheat from farmers and then distributes it through the public distribution system. If food subsidies are done away with, this procurement would not be required.

Hence, in an ideal world, a successful universal basic income programme would mean the end of the procurement, transportation and distribution of subsidised rice and wheat. This would mean that the government would have to stop acquiring the massive amount of rice and wheat that it does from farmers directly through the Food Corporation of India and other state procurement agencies.

This is something that hasn't been discussed at all by the economists recommending the universal basic income. Would politicians be ready for something like this? What would be the impact on food inflation? Does the open market for rice and wheat work well enough? What would happen to the five lakh fair price shops across the length and the breadth of the country? Would the government shut down the Food Corporation of India, or would it scale down its operations?

These are questions which no one would like to get into. In this scenario, my guess is that if universal basic income is introduced in the near future, it will be over and above the government subsidies already in place. And that can't possibly be a good thing. It is something that the country cannot afford.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

How to Make Trump Pay June 19, 2018
Seeing through the world's hatred for Trump gives investors opportunities where others are blinded. You can make Trump pay. Property prices near the North Korean border have doubled in one South Korean town. Are South Korean stocks next?
Ike was right! June 19, 2018
Primary trends for both US stocks and US bonds are negative, and if Bill is right, we are at the beginning of a long slide...down... into chaos, destitution, and destruction.
Donald Trump's Attack on Saudi Arabia Led OPEC Makes No Sense June 19, 2018
This could destabilize the current global monetary order.
Were We Wrong About Everything? June 15, 2018
Despite the predictions of gloom, the US economy seems to be booming. There is more than full employment, Fed is normalizing its monetary policy. So, is it the time for us to rethink? Bill Bonner offer insights on the same.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Can India Afford a Universal Basic Income?". Click here!

8 Responses to "Can India Afford a Universal Basic Income?"

Niki Kotian

Feb 8, 2017

If government is mooting a low interest regime then ubi is a must. There is a big chunk of retired senior citizens who are dependent only one the income from interest on their savings for livelihood. If their source of income is trimmed they have to be compensated by ubi


Meenal Mamdani

Jan 29, 2017

Even if all the actions recommended by the economists are put in place, UBI is not helpful for Indian citizens at this stage of development of civil society.
Western countries like Norway are piloting this concept in small areas, but these countries have in place things that are lacking in India like good infrastructure, functioning democracy so abuses can be quickly identified, a functioning law and order system, adequate health care and high quality universal education. These are just some of the things that need to be in place before we contemplate UBI.
If that is not in place, then the hapless citizen will face extortion and harassment that will deplete his bank account in no time at all and he will be at the mercy of the most wily and corrupt among her/his milieu.


Dipak Dholakia

Jan 28, 2017

There is no point in paying the amount to tax payers. After all that will be taxable income. Also, it will be a subsidy to all whether they need such a support or not.

Recently the Seventh Central Pay Commission has fixed need-based minimum wage at Rs. 18,500. No family should get less than that. If an employee (in the government or private sector) gets this much he should not be entitled to receive this money. However, this is needbased amount. If we aim at achieving decent living for all a family of would need at least Rs. 30,000 to 40,000. Now if an employed person earns less than this the shortfall should be covered by an additional income in form of UBI.


Gunvant Vyas

Jan 27, 2017

You are right corrupt political party will never have courage to take step in right direction.


Dr. K. S. Ananda Kumar.

Jan 27, 2017

One does not need brains to understand that some parties advise sanction of Universal Basic Income may be sanctioned by the Govt. of India. They want Modi's Govt. to collapse and fall.
Somebody told that India is a sleeping nation. No. Only some people at the top are sleeping and not the nation as a whole. It does not take a brilliant scientist to find that the large number of youth to be supported by jobs etc. - simply it is not possible. The ever expanding population makes it impossible. Another thing is marriage of teen girls and boys, which can't be controlled in India. More than 50% of rural people get their kids married before they are even 15 years for girls and before they are 21 years for boys. You can come to any village and verify the statistics



Jan 27, 2017

UBI is an excellent concept. It has to be adopted to Indian situation. Firstly can not we consider a UBI for the ration card holders meaning poor people and lower/middle income groups. The question regarding Food corporation of India and food procurement have other sides of benefit. Think of the amount of cereals and pulses being wasted by FCI and the enormous cost of personnel maintaining warehouses paying for transportation etc. Ragarding government procurement, I believe 'water will find its own level'. Another bonus for the agriculturists will be higher prices for their products by way of free market interaction. I am fully aware that it is a political decision in India. Also if at all it us implementated it should not be like 'Demonitisation'. Every aspect should be throughly discussed and approved and no one should be left in lurch.Also transparency should be there.



Jan 27, 2017

govt has no balls to tax agriculture income- if done their days are numbered. they can not do away present system of subsidy as it will effect politician and bureaucracy and local politician, and if they are going to distribute amount like this is like taking away money from pockets of those having money and will them also beggar, instead of all this they should create wealth by encouraging more local production and creating jobs. and pity is that many times people do not want work and earn as they have been fed free for numbers of years so why work.let us not towards Stalinism where people had to stand in queue for loaf of bread .


Dilip Kulkarni

Jan 27, 2017

And then Mr. Modi can appeal to all the high society households to relinquish this in the name of the country and save some money !!!!

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Can India Afford a Universal Basic Income?". Click here!