Free Reports

Jaitley's Fiscal Deficit Numbers Don't Really Add Up

Mar 1, 2016


Dear Reader,

By the time you read this piece, you would have been bombarded with a huge amount of analysis on the budget the finance minister Arun Jaitley presented yesterday.

Nevertheless, most such analysis misses out on carefully looking at the fiscal deficit number, which is basically what the budget is all about. Most other things that finance ministers talk about in their budget speeches, they can talk about on any other day of the year as well.

In fact, regular readers would know that I have been sceptical about the ability of the government to meet its fiscal deficit target. Fiscal deficit is the difference between what a government earns and what it spends during the course of any year. The difference is met through borrowing.

While presenting the budget last year, the finance minister Jaitley had said that the government expects to achieve a fiscal deficit target of 3.5% of GDP for 2016-2017 and 3% of GDP for 2017-2018.

In the budget presented yesterday Jaitley said that: "I have weighed the policy options and decided that prudence lies in adhering to the fiscal targets. Consequently, the fiscal deficit in RE[revised estimate] 2015-16 and BE[budget estimate] 2016-17 have been retained at 3.9% and 3.5% of GDP respectively."

  Missed The Conference?  
Let The Conference Come To You...
  The Equitymaster Conference 2016 was a grand success!

This year, we had some of most valued members join us from more than 20 cities across India and from international destinations like United Kingdom, UAE, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia too.

However, if due to any reason you missed out on joining us at The Taj...

Allow us to bring The Complete Equitymaster Conference 2016 to you!

Yes, here's your opportunity to get online-access to the complete Equitymaster Conference 2016 - The Modi-fied India Story.

Right from the welcome address to the concluding remarks...and everything in between.

Watch Ajit Dayal and Bill Bonner deliver their keynote addresses...Vivek Kaul reveal the true Modi-fied India Story...Asad & Apurva reveal the future of trading...Rahul Shah & Tanushree decode the Indian Consumption Story... and more.

All from the comfort of your home!

Click here to reserve your online access...

The question is how realistic is the 3.5% of GDP fiscal deficit target for the next financial year? There are essentially three inputs that go into making the fiscal deficit number. The total receipts of the government, the total expenditure of the government and the nominal GDP number that has been assumed for the next financial year. Nominal GDP is the GDP which hasn't been adjusted for inflation.

Let's start with the receipts number. Jaitley has assumed that the government plans to collect Rs 56,500 crore through the disinvestment route. Of this, Rs 36,000 crore will come from the government selling shares in the companies its own and Rs 20,500 crore from the stakes that it has in non-government companies.

The total number assumed to come in through the disinvestment route is more than double of the Rs 25,312 crore that the government collected through the route this financial year. It needs to be pointed out here that a substantial part of this came from the Life Insurance Corporation(LIC) of India picking up stakes in government owned companies. Honestly that can't be called disinvestment. It is money moving from one arm of the government to another.

Second, last year the government had assumed that Rs 69,500 crore would come in through disinvestment. Ultimately, only Rs 25,312 crore has been collected and that also after LIC had to come to the rescue . One excuse offered for the government going slow on disinvestment was low commodity prices. Commodity prices continue to remain low.

Given this, the Rs 56,500 crore disinvestment number is an overestimate like was the case last year as well.

The government has also assumed that it will earn Rs 98,994.93 crore from the telecom sector. This receipt comes under the entry "other communication services" and is primarily the money the government will earn through telecom spectrum auctions. Again, like is the case with disinvestment receipts, this number is a huge jump from the Rs 57,383.89 crore that the government managed to collect this year.

Given, the past record of the government, these assumptions are clearly looking overoptimistic. Also, they help in under-declaring the fiscal deficit. As per IMF norms, any kind of asset sales by the government needs to be treated as a financing item and not as a receipt as the Indian government does. In the process the government manages to come up with a lower fiscal deficit number.

Now let's take a look at the expenditure front. There is no clarity on how much allocation the government has made towards implementing the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission. As Jaitley said during his speech: "the Seventh Central Pay Commission has submitted its Report. Following the past practice, a Committee has been constituted to examine the Report and give its recommendations. In the meantime, I have made necessary interim provisions in the Budget."

The finance minister didn't get into any more details. Nevertheless, one can use the numbers given in the budget and see if the right kind of allocation has been made. During 2015-2016, the government's salary and pension bill (excluding Railways) is expected to be at Rs 1.85 lakh crore.

In 2016-2017, the government's salary and pension bill has been budgeted at around Rs 2.25 lakh crore. This is Rs 40,000 crore more than the 2015-2016 number.

The Seventh Pay Commission recommendations come into force from January 1, 2016. The Seventh Finance Commission had said that its recommendations would cost the government Rs 73,650 crore during the first year. To this one would have add the cost of Pay Commission recommendations between January and March 2016, which would be needed to be paid as arrears to the government employees and pensioners.

This works out to Rs 18,412.5 crore (Rs 73,650 crore divided by four). Hence, the total extra allocation towards implementing the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission should have been around Rs 92,000 crore (Rs 74,650 crore plus Rs 18,412.5 crore). The actual increase in allocation towards salaries and pensions is only around Rs 40,000 crore.

What does this tell us? The government is probably not in the mood to pass on the entire increase in salaries and pensions during the course of 2016-2017. If it does that, then it will have to pay arrears in the years to come and that will add to the government expenditure and hence, the fiscal deficit. So to that extent the fiscal deficit is being under-declared at this moment.

Also, the implementation of one rank one pension in the defence forces is expected to push the pension bill up, by Rs 10,000 crore. And that will also add to the salary and the pension bill of the government.

Further, as I have pointed out in the past, more than Rs 1,00,000 crore of food and fertilizer subsidy bills remain unpaid. And that is how it continues to be. The allocation to food and fertilizer subsidy has fallen from Rs 2.12 lakh crore in 2015-2016 to Rs 2.05 lakh crore in 2016-2017.

What does this mean? It means that while the government will pay the Rs 1,00,000 lakh crore of pending food and fertilizer subsidy bills, it will then have to postpone paying a large part of the food and fertilizer subsidy expenditure that is incurred during the next financial year.

The government follows the cash accounting system and only acknowledges expenses once payment has been made. This has led to a situation where subsidy payments to Food Corporation of India(FCI) and fertilizer companies remain unpaid. The money has been spent by FCI and the fertilizer companies towards subsidy, but remains unpaid by the government, and hence is not acknowledged as an expenditure.

The question is where does FCI get this money from? It borrows from the financial market. Why does the market lend money to FCI? It does that because it knows that it is effectively lending money to the Indian government. Hence, this subsidy expenditure has already been incurred by the government but has not been accounted for.

This essentially leads to a lower fiscal deficit number. Further, the absolute fiscal deficit number of Rs 5,33,904 crore looks very unrealistic given that the receipts of the government have been overstated while the expenditure has been understated.

Now let's talk about the denominator in the fiscal deficit number, the nominal GDP. The nominal GDP for 2016-2017 has been assumed to be at Rs 15,065,010 crore assuming 11% growth over the 2015-2016 number. How realistic is this assumption? In 2015-2016, the nominal GDP is expected to grow at 8.6%. Given this, how realistic is an assumption of 11% nominal GDP growth for 2016-2017?

To conclude, it is safe to say that Jaitley's fiscal deficit number is not believable. As the American professor Aaron Levenstein once said: "Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital."

What Jaitley has managed to conceal is vital.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

A New Infrastructure Boom March 26, 2019
Selva Freigedo talks about the potential in 5G network and how it could transform the way we communicate.
A 40 Somethings Guide to YouTube Hits March 20, 2019
Vivek dwells into a new YouTube phenomenon.
As the Economy Slows Down, Maruti and Two-Wheeler Companies Cut Production March 19, 2019
The country's largest car maker has cut production by more than a fourth.
In Supporting Demonetisation, RBI Behaved Like an Old Uncle Not Willing to Take a Stand March 13, 2019
The minutes of the meeting of the RBI Board which happened before demonetisation have been released.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Jaitley's Fiscal Deficit Numbers Don't Really Add Up". Click here!

10 Responses to "Jaitley's Fiscal Deficit Numbers Don't Really Add Up"

AB Pereira

Mar 5, 2016

Brilliant analysis, thats why I am stuck to Vivek Kaul and Bill Bonner for my daily staple of economics!



Mar 2, 2016

A great job and a bold, rare & glorious service to the nation, in the present days of deceit and lies.


Girish Patkar

Mar 2, 2016

In my opinion it is a good budget in the given circumstances. It is a politically correct and inclusive budget which will give a fillip to the rural economy. Going by the NDA performance on deliverable efficiency ( JAM,DBT-LPG, Power, Roads, Mining etc) one cam assume that ideas and programs will be successfully implemented.

All fisc maths is based on assumptions and operating plans are drawn to achieve the budgets estimates. If 3.9% fisc deficit is achievable why doubt 3.5 %

Like (1)

Dhruv Shah

Mar 2, 2016

Good Analysis. Gives food for thought for knowing what is the vital stuff hidden behind the Bikini (Budget)!!!

I am not an expert on this subject, but the analysis done is very nice, basic and simple to understand, just as what it should be rather den showing up a complex thing so general public do not understand it.

Content of all your post are really very Nice Mr.Vivek. Very logical, very sensible, very clear and simple, and at the end of the day its your view so its not necessary all should like it, but i do love reading your post.

As written by some great person i cant recall as of now. "Making things simple requires extra ordinary brains, rest any dumb can make things complicated!", and you make economy very simple to understand and comprehend. All the best to you Mr.Vivek.

Like (1)

Srinivas B

Mar 1, 2016

Really good analysis..!

Like (1)


Mar 1, 2016

The most revealing and insightful column by far on this budget, streets ahead of the various erudite analyses by the many financial pundits in the pink papers. Definitely helped clear some of the wool which was pulled over my eyes. Kudos Mr Kaul!

Like (2)

ramana kumar

Mar 1, 2016

Vivek's analysis is basic. we have seen these kind of comments elsewhere. how does Vivek then explain the Govt meeting the Fiscal Deficit target of 3.9% in the current fiscal ? or meeting the target for 2014-15 as well ? in fact, as the Govt took charge in May and the interim Budget was tabled in July. markets wud have forgiven a slippage that year, but credit to the Modi govt that they stuck the target already committed by the UPA govt.
Finally, the tax receipts likely from the window created for disclosure of undeclared income. the Budget Document is a projection/estimate of income and expenditure. actuals may and wl differ under all heads. as long as the broad fiscal arithmetic works out, that shud not be a problem.

Like (1)

Balakrishnan R

Mar 1, 2016

Mr. Jaitly is a lawyer. He knows how to present his client's case. I think, he has just followed it. Mr. Modi is dependent on Mr. Jaitly for every thing. Even he is there to spend time to defend Mrs Smriti Irani rather than preparing budget.

Like (1)

Sunil Kumar sharma

Mar 1, 2016

Like all columnists, Mr Vivek Kaul also has a deep inferiority complex. Like all others, he has no problem in telling half truths and resorting to subterfuge just to prove his point to satisfy his own ego. He resorts to subterfuge or plain untruth that LIC money is same as Govt Revenue. Grow up man, learn basics of accounting and economy. Stop fooling the readers and nation. Such fake arguments create basic doubts about the main argument itself.

Like (1)

Subramanian Murthy

Mar 1, 2016

Hi I agree with your analysis and the experience of earlier year should be taken as a better bench mark to analyse this to understand the trend is past so many years. It would have been better if you had compared your analysis on fiscal deficit in the last year budget to the actual numbers it turned out based on actual. This will reveal the past trend and also whether what was concealed is vital or not.

Like (4)
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Jaitley's Fiscal Deficit Numbers Don't Really Add Up". Click here!