Free Reports

Why It's Best to Stay Away from Buying LIC Policies

Apr 21, 2016

28

The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India is India's biggest insurance company. It is also India's biggest investment firm.

It is so big that it keeps coming to the rescue of the government now and then, when the government cannot find enough buyers for the financial securities that it wants to sell.

Nevertheless, the question is, how good is LIC when it comes to generating returns on the investments it makes?

Before we figure that out, it is good to point out that LIC is basically an investment firm which also sells insurance. A major portion of the money that it collects as premium from Indians, against the so called insurance policies that it sells, is invested in stocks and bonds (both private as well as government).

The insurance policies that LIC sells are basically investment plans with a dash of insurance. And given that the premium that it collects and in turn invests, should be generating decent returns for the policyholders (actually investors). Of course, the tragedy is that most of these policy holders don't even know that they are actually investors.

So how do things look? The accompanying table gives us the investment track record of LIC between 2005-2006 and 2014-2015. As is clear from the table the investment record of LIC has been dismal to say the least.

In 2014-2015, the investment firm earned a return of 7% on its investments. The average return on the 10-year government bond during the course of the year was 8.3%. The investment return of LIC was 130 basis points lower than the average return on a 10-year government bond. One basis point is one hundredth of a percentage.

Year Income from investments (In Rs crore) Investments (In Rs Crore) Return (%) Average returns on 10 year govt bond Difference
2014-2015 1,35,483 19,462,49 7.00% 8.30% 130 basis points
2013-2014 1,18,097 16.846,90 7.00% 8.40% 140 basis points
2012-2013 1,03,882 14,864,57 7.00% 8.20% 120 basis points
2011-2012 90,267 13,495,32 6.70% 8.50% 180 basis points
2010-2011 77,667 12,665,39 6.10% 7.90% 180 basis points
2009-2010 67,198 10,958,41 6.10% 7.30% 120 basis points
2008-2009 56,583 8,15,484 6.90% 7.60% 70 basis points
2007-2008 47,999 7,56,891 6.30% 7.90% 160 basis points
2006-2007 40,572 6,13,267 6.60% 7.80% 120 basis points
2005-2006 35,479 5,24,017 6.80% 7.20% 40 basis points
Source: Annual reports of LIC

[These numbers may not reflect mark-to-market on certain investments and hence the investment income may be higher, though it cannot meaningfully alter the returns.]

In fact, the difference between the average returns on a 10-year government bond during the course of a year and the investment returns of LIC vary between 40 basis points and 180 basis points. This is a huge difference.

The average return on investment for LIC over a period of ten years between 2005-2006 and 2014-2015 has been 6.7%. The average return on a ten-year bond has been 7.9%. The difference between the two returns is 120 basis points.

In fact, the average rate of inflation between 2005-2006 and 2014-2015 was 8.85%. Hence, the average return on investment of LIC was lower than the rate of inflation as well.

What does this tell us about a professional investment firm like LIC? It tells us that LIC is doing a terrible job of managing public money. Any investment firm should be able to generate average returns greater than the returns on government bonds, at least. It should also be able to beat the inflation. In fact, that is what it is paid a fee for. But that doesn't seem to be happening in case of LIC.

The investment returns of LIC have been consistently lower than the 10-year government bond returns. First and foremost, this tells us that the investment management capabilities of LIC are very bad, given that its investment returns have been 120 basis points lower than returns on a 10-year government bond, over a period of ten years.

Further, LIC would be simply better off by buying government bonds and then holding on to them till maturity, instead of actively trying to manage money. It would probably end up earning higher returns than it currently does.

Second, what this also tells us is that the government is interfering too much in the functioning of the firm and getting it to make investments, which it shouldn't be making in the normal scheme of things. The government regularly gets LIC to invest in shares of public sector enterprises which other investors are not willing to pick up.


Advertisement
 Modi 2016: An Agenda For Revival
 
 The Modi Report The landslide victory of 2014 handed Modi more than just a clear mandate...It handed him immense responsibility of a nation dreaming of great progress.

From the euphoria of Achche Din the mood in India has swung to cautious disappointment and now we are in 2016...

Who will answer the question how Modi can turn this ship around and get India back on track?

Vivek Kaul has the answer and he has put it all down, along with his deepest thoughts on the challenges India faces, in our latest special report titled - Modi 2016 - An Agenda For Revival.

And the best part is that he wants to give you this special report for free!

So, don't delay...Click here to download this special report right away!
 

In the recent past LIC has picked up stakes in public-sector banks to help them meet their capital requirements. As a March 29, 2016, news-report in The Indian Express points out: "Since the beginning of 2016, LIC has brought into preferential allotment of as many as six banks, supporting the fund-raising requirement of these banks in turn. Share prices of PSBs on an average have declined close to 11.7% so far this year."

The public-sector banks are sitting on a huge corporate-debt time bomb. Many corporates they have lent to over the years are currently no longer in a position to repay their loans or have simply siphoned off this money. The question is why is LIC money being invested in these banks? This is because the government wants to continue owning these banks, instead of selling them out.

Also, LIC now owns 21.22% of Corporation Bank, 14.37% of IDBI Bank and 14.99% of Dena Bank. Again, the question, why should an investment firm managing public money be taking on such concentrated risk? In fact, the Securities and Exchange Board of India(Sebi) regulations do not allow a mutual fund to own more than 10% of a company.

Why doesn't the same rule apply to LIC as well? Like mutual funds LIC is also in the business of managing hard-earned public money.

Unnamed LIC officials in various news-reports justify this buying by saying that they are buying value. Maybe they are, but buying value does not mean betting the house on one stock. When an institution is managing as much money as LIC is, some basic investing principles need to be followed.

Third, it tells us that individuals are better off putting their money somewhere else rather buying LIC policies. What is the point in investing money in order to earn a return of 6-7% on an average? Yes, investing in LIC policies helps people save on tax, but there are better ways of saving tax like the Public Provident Fund (PPF).

Between 2009 and now the returns on PPF have never gone below 8%. In fact, currently the rate of interest on PPF is at 8.1%. As far as an insurance cover is concerned, individuals can look at buying a pure term insurance policy, which just offers insurance against the premium paid.

Fourth, the government needs LIC to finance its fiscal deficit and to keep rescuing the public sector enterprises which aren't a viable business anymore. Fiscal deficit is the difference between what a government earns and what it spends. LIC helps the government finance its fiscal deficit by buying government bonds and at the same time it also helps the government meet its disinvestment target by buying shares of public sector enterprises which other investors are not interested in. This money helps narrow the fiscal deficit.

In the process, the returns that LIC is able to generate on its investment portfolio get compromised on.

Fifth, when was the last time you saw an article analysing the returns on various LIC policies? Like is the case with other insurance companies, it is not possible to figure out which LIC plan has given what kind of return, over the years. Hence, it is best to stay away from investing in them.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

The Great Leader Has Won the Cow-Teller Award and Now Wants a Case Study January 17, 2019
This is a spoof.
Mohammed "Munna" Aziz and the Summer of 1989 November 28, 2018
Vivek reminisces a nearly three decade-old summer, spent listening to a Hindi film song.
I'm Looking for Companies Not Influenced by Farm Loan Waivers and Minimum Support Prices November 16, 2018
Are there any good companies in the agrochemical space worth looking at?
Should You Abandon Your Investment Strategy in This Falling Market? November 2, 2018
It is in these volatile times, when investors' mettle is tested the most...

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Why It's Best to Stay Away from Buying LIC Policies". Click here!

25 Responses to "Why It's Best to Stay Away from Buying LIC Policies"

Ameet parekh

Apr 21, 2016

Very rightly put Vivek,lic policies are useless investments.I have reliazed it after 20 yrs that my premiums invested in a good stock or a diversified equity mutual fund would have given me tremendous returns. In life risks are to be taken not shied away from.

Like (5)

Parin

Apr 21, 2016

Not sure if this analysis is misleading since what about capital appreciation thru investments which will be known only if MTM is done. Please recheck n confirm

Like (3)

parimal shah

Apr 21, 2016

Hello Vivek,
First of all, I am not a fan or do not hold brief for LIC.
But please note you are ignoring the risk cover offered by LIC.
-Parimal

Like (4)

Kamesh V Chivukula

Apr 21, 2016

Your prescription is crappy. What is wrong for the Govt. to use LIC to finance its fiscal deficit when it has majority stake in it.
Your stupid prescription to privatize all PSU banks as they dont turn up a profit shows your complete ignorance of the intent of the govt. to nationalize banks.
Private banks ask for a minimum account balance of Rs.5k to 10k whereas PSU banks don't ask for minimum balance.
LIC is primarily an insurance company not a fund house. Even if were making huge ROI's it will not pass over these profits to the customer.
Vivek you are outa your depth in analyzing Indian economy or the financial instruments. Please let us enjoy Bill Bonner's articles instead of your stupid and ill informed ones.

Like (4)

M Baskaran

Apr 21, 2016

Hai vivek,
Its a well researched article on LIC. luckily i sensed this LIC behaviour long back and never invested even insurance policies with LIC...Except for term policy, i dont think it can generate anything more than 7% on any investment. Its like any other PSB...that's all... But unfortunately common people dont understand these facts and figures...Not only this u should see how they pay their staff! rediculous for the work they do! But whats option for alternate investment....how about pvt insurance! how about ULIPS! see the charge they take initially...thats why its a failure...so pl do research and tell people about pvt insureares also...how about in other countries, especially USA...i hope they are very much professionally managed!
with regards
M Baskaran

Like (4)

A

Apr 21, 2016

There is no transparency in the so-called insurance companies, LIC or private.
What is your analysis on the investment done in EPF, PPF, and other govt saving schemes? Where is the money invested and what returns are generated?

Like (4)

Aghraja Bhatia

Apr 21, 2016

Hi Vivek,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on LIC as an investment firm. I think this time your article is lopsided and this is primarily due to not sharing any information on LIC as an insurance company.

Is is not unfair to ignore the company's performance as an insurance company and not pick financial ratios like Combined Operating Ratio and/or Insurance Margin?

Maybe you reach to the same conclusion but I think the path is more important than the destination.

Lastly, what about those who have heavily invested and can't come out (primarily those who purchased pure insurance plans and not ULIPs)?

Kind Regards,
Aghraja Bhatia

Like (1)

R.K. AHLUWALIA

Apr 21, 2016

What L.I.C. IS DOING IS THEIR BUSINESS. YOU SHOULD COME OUT WITH ALTERNATE BETTER INSURANCE COMPANY. IT IS TRUE THAT L.I.C IS GIVING POOR RETURNS, BUT IT IS MOST SAFE COMPANY AND VERY PROMPT IN MAKING PAYMENT IN CASE OF DEATH AND NO HASSELS. I HAVE SEEN OTHER INSURANCE COMPANIES FIND EXCUSE FOR NOT MAKING PAYMENT IN CASE OF DEATH OF THE INSURERER.

Like (3)

Shashank Tilak

Apr 21, 2016

As Sri Raghuraman Rajan has said correctly (on a different scale and context) LIC happens to be the one eyed person in a kingdom of blinds. None (I REPEAT NONE) of the private sector insurance companies - particularly with the "INVESTMENT" orientation - through the ULIP method, have given me a positive return. In fact in number of cases basic safety of the capital itself is in question. In that case at least the LIC is a good hope - particularly for the uninitiated investors. At least they offer a POSITIVE return. It may be less than the government bonds but safety of capital is the first principle that they deliver on.

My money for LIC as compared to other money damagers and their slick sales talk any day.

Shashank Tilak

Like (2)

Munish

Apr 21, 2016

great analysis...as per this looks like lic not for life but for banks...so it should be named as bank insurance corporation.

Like (2)
<<Prev    Next>>
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Why It's Best to Stay Away from Buying LIC Policies". Click here!