Free Reports

One Lesson from the One Rupee Accounts in Jan Dhan Yojana

Sep 28, 2016


One of the major successes of the Narendra Modi government has been the Jan Dhan Yojana. In fact, in 2015, around 12 crore bank accounts were opened under the scheme at a rapid pace of over 3 lakh accounts per day.

As of September 21, 2016, a total of 24.61 crore accounts have been opened under the scheme. The accounts have a total of Rs 43,347.84 crore under them. Only, around 23.98 per cent of the accounts are zero balance accounts i.e. the accounts have been opened, but there is no money in these accounts.

This is a huge improvement over January 31, 2015, when 67.3 per cent of the accounts were zero balance accounts. Further, there were a total of 12.55 crore accounts that had been opened under the scheme, at that point of time. These accounts had a total of Rs 10,499.62 crore in them. The accounts now have more than four times the money they had in January 2015. Hence, things have improved significantly.

Earlier this month, The Indian Express reported that: "Bank officials are quietly making one-rupee deposits, many from their own allowances, some from money kept aside for office maintenance. Their ostensible goal: to reduce the branch's tally of zero-balance accounts."

Branch managers told the Express that there was pressure on them to show that the zero-balance accounts were falling. And this is why they ended up doing what they did.

The Indian Express further reported that the percentage of accounts with one rupee deposits is fairly significant. Take the case of Punjab National Bank. Of the 1.36 crore accounts that the bank had opened under the Jan Dhan Yojana around 12.97 lakh accounts had deposits of Re 1. The UCO Bank had opened 74.6 lakh accounts under the Jan Dhan Yojana. Of this 11.06 lakh accounts had deposits of Re 1.

While this does not mean that the Jan Dhan Yojana has been unsuccessful, it does take away some its sheen. Also, the fact that the number of zero-balance accounts have come down dramatically since January 2015, cannot be taken that seriously.

There is a lesson that needs to be learnt here. If the government starts following one measure of performance or gives it more importance than others, chances are the measure will be gamed.

One example (though rather extreme) of this played out in communist China under Mao Zedong. Mao wanted agricultural production of China to increase at a very fast pace. He wanted to use the agricultural surplus (whatever was left after the Chinese consumption) to finance ambitious military as well as industrial projects.

A Short Video On Vivek's Latest Views About "The Next Big Indian Crisis"
  After sending you various emails about "The Next Big Indian Crisis" over the past few weeks...

Vivek Kaul decided that it is time for him to share with you, his latest views on the ugly turn this "crisis" has taken and the potential danger it put YOUR future in.

Join Vivek and us, as we discuss the severity of India's situation in an exclusive video made just for his readers...

Click HERE to watch...

As Yuval Noah Harari writes in Homo Deus-A Brief History of Tomorrow: "Mao's impossible demands made their way down the bureaucratic ladder, from the government offices in Beijing, through provincial administrators, all the way to the village headmen. The local officials afraid of voicing any criticism and wishing to curry favour with their superiors, concocted imaginary reports of dramatic increases in agricultural output. As the fabricated numbers made their way up the bureaucratic hierarchy, each official only exaggerated them further, adding a zero here or there with a stroke of a pen."

The trouble was that as everyone up the hierarchy padded the numbers, the fictional number of grain production that reached the top was much higher than the actual production. And this had its consequences.

As Harari writes: "Consequently, in 1958 the Chinese government was told that annual grain production was 50 per cent more than it actually was. Believing the reports, the government sold millions of tons of rice to foreign countries in exchange for weapons and heavy machinery, assuming that enough was left to feed the Chinese population. The result was the worst famine in history and the death of tens of millions of Chinese."

In this case, the government pushing for a particular result to be achieved, led to that result being achieved on paper. In the process, the numbers were believed and the food grains sold off. It eventually led to people dying of hunger.

In the Jan Dhan Yojana case there have been no disastrous consequences. All it has led to is a slightly embarrassed government and that's about it. Nevertheless, there is a lesson in it for us. If the government puts too much focus on one measure of performance, chances are ultimately that the lower bureaucracy will game the number.

In economics there is even a law for a situation like this and it's called the Goodhart's law (named after economist Charles Goodhart). The Goodhart's law states that, "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." And this is precisely what has happened with the focus on bringing down the zero-balance accounts, opened under the Jan Dhana Yojana.

Also, it is worth reminding here that as more and more government subsidies are paid out as cash to citizens, the number of zero balance accounts will automatically come down in the years to come. Of course, this will take time.

Vivek Kaul is the Editor of the Diary and The Vivek Kaul Letter. Vivek is a writer who has worked at senior positions with the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) and The Economic Times, in the past. He is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. The latest book in the trilogy Easy Money: The Greatest Ponzi Scheme Ever and How It Is Set to Destroy the Global Financial System was published in March 2015. The books were bestsellers on Amazon. His writing has also appeared in The Times of India, The Hindu, The Hindu Business Line, Business World, Business Today, India Today, Business Standard, Forbes India, Deccan Chronicle, The Asian Age, Mutual Fund Insight, Wealth Insight, Swarajya, Bangalore Mirror among others.

Disclaimer: The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Recent Articles

Introducing "Bad Guy" Theory May 25, 2018
Who's bad and who's good? Bill takes a look at the "Bad Guy" Theory and answers where do Americans stand on the good vs bad debate in today's issue.
World Banks Are "Swimming Naked" May 24, 2018
If the primary trend for equities and bonds is down, are we likely to make any money in stocks and credit market for the next 10 or 20 years?
Merger with Associate Banks Has Pulled Down Performance of SBI May 23, 2018
The bad loans ratio of the bank which was at 6.9% before the merger, has jumped to 10.9% as on March 2018.
Who Sanctions America? May 23, 2018
The US bombs, drones, and assassinates...bullying, bossing, and bamboozling small countries that can't defend themselves. Bill takes a look at how the US is unopposed, on the top of the heap and also questions about who sanctions it for all its actions...

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "One Lesson from the One Rupee Accounts in Jan Dhan Yojana". Click here!

2 Responses to "One Lesson from the One Rupee Accounts in Jan Dhan Yojana"


Sep 29, 2016

Why always take a negative stance. Is not it a great achievement to open so many accounts. Paying all subsidies through bank and reducing corruption for poor. In a country like India, it may take 5-7 years to achieve visible results wits states like UP & Bihar. I have observed you are always negative first and never appreciate good policies.


Subbu subramaniam

Sep 28, 2016

It is but natural human behaviour to achieve incentive ( which includes not being punished ) by meeting targets or bench marks set for the incentive .
Not too long ago in the private sector - more specifically the high growth eCommerce sector we have seen the enterprises focus on achieving "growth in top-line" at detriment to bottom line ( often selling at loss goods that were purchased / sourced).
Prima facie this is irrational behaviour as no one likes to incur losses ( simple psychology to behaviour is
Finance support this hypothesis) , however if we consider the fact that professional VC and PE investors were valuing companies on the basis of revenues , there was enough incentive to buy at 100 and sell at 80 since the valuation increase by a measure of 5X100 !!!

There have been unsubstantiated reports that some eCommere companies did not move good but produced " fake " proof of deliveries to game this valuation metric !

Humans are humans whether driven by government priorities or economic incentive ..,,!

The opening of accounts is a BIG step towards cash less , leak proof method of benefit transfer !

Well begun is Half done!

Luck !
It is not just

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "One Lesson from the One Rupee Accounts in Jan Dhan Yojana". Click here!