When Leaders Deliver
A leader, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is "a person who has commanding authority or influence".
This is not surprising because leaders are given a "right" to lead us and we expect them to show "leadership" as they lead everyone in a particular direction.
But there is no one definition of "leadership". A quick search suggests there are 18 popular definitions or traits of a leader, as suggested by a 2012 column authored by Marty Rasing.
Some of those 18 definitions are:
- LEADERSHIP IS NOT MAGNETIC PERSONALITY, THAT CAN JUST AS WELL BE A GLIB TONGUE.
- IT IS NOT "MAKING FRIENDS AND INFLUENCING PEOPLE", THAT IS FLATTERY.
- LEADERSHIP IS LIFTING A PERSON'S VISION TO HIGHER SIGHTS, THE RAISING OF A PERSON'S PERFORMANCE TO A HIGHER STANDARD, THE BUILDING OF A PERSONALITY BEYOND ITS NORMAL LIMITATIONS." - PETER F. DRUCKER
This one from the CEO of VISA:
- CONTROL IS NOT LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT IS NOT LEADERSHIP; LEADERSHIP IS LEADERSHIP.
- IF YOU SEEK TO LEAD, INVEST AT LEAST 50% OF YOUR TIME IN LEADING YOURSELF-YOUR OWN PURPOSE, ETHICS, PRINCIPLES, MOTIVATION, CONDUCT. INVEST AT LEAST 20% LEADING THOSE WITH AUTHORITY OVER YOU AND 15% LEADING YOUR PEERS."- DEE HOCK, FOUNDER AND CEO EMERITUS, VISA
Galbriath saw the role of a leader to be one of solving a problem:
- "ALL OF THE GREAT LEADERS HAVE HAD ONE CHARACTERISTIC IN COMMON: IT WAS THE WILLINGNESS TO CONFRONT UNEQUIVOCALLY THE MAJOR ANXIETY OF THEIR PEOPLE IN THEIR TIME. THIS, AND NOT MUCH ELSE, IS THE ESSENCE OF LEADERSHIP." - JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH
Bonaparte, often at war with a need to inspire soldiers to die for a cause said:
- "A LEADER IS A DEALER IN HOPE." - NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
While the debates over the qualities of good political leadership in steering a country through a crisis it may face from an internal or an external threat will continue for a long time, either from blinkered souls clawing with their nails as they stare at a dark abyss or from wounded souls sharpening their nails for a swipe, the question of what makes good leadership in the corporate world will gain more importance.
The Rewards of Backing Leadership
According to the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG-17), the world does not have a lot of time to fix many of its problems ranging from hunger to gender inequality to climate crisis. While national governments are enacting laws to achieve the SDG-17 goals by 2030 at an estimated cost of USD 5 to 7 trillion per year (about 7% of annual global GDP) for the 15 year period starting 2016; for a total bill of USD 75 trillion to USD 105 trillion to achieve SDG-17.
Not surprisingly, governments are relying upon companies to pick up a part of the price tag and moral responsibility of helping achieve SDG-17. With operations spread across the globe or entrenched in local communities, companies can be great partners in this journey. From paying farmers in poor nations a fair price for their crops or raw materials, to banning the use of child labour, to ensuring that women are paid on the same basis as men, to preventing pollution from their factories which may harm their host communities the corporations have their work cut out for them.
The behavior of companies, though, is driven by the signals from their leadership: whether it is leadership exhibited by the founder, the CEO, the Board - or a combination of these critical elements. It is the "tone at the top" that sets the pace for how a company behaves as it aims to build its business. The past focus on profits as a sole measure of success is passe. The future metrics by which a company - and its leadership - will be judged are the 3 P's: Planet. People. Profit.
This is commonly referred to as ESG: Environment, Social, Governance criteria.
ESG, not yet a science and barely an art.
Measuring the impact of a company on the Planet (pollution, consumption of raw materials), People (its employees, the community in which it operates), and Profit (long term, not short term quarterly focus) is not yet a science, it is still a very inexact art. Global comparisons of ESG scores are not easy, since data is not standardized. Local comparisons of ESG scores are not easy since data may not be reported by many peers. In many countries, ESG is considered as a "socialist" or "communist" ideal floated to underline the touted success and existence of capitalism.
Within this evolution of perpetual change and an increasingly deeper understanding of ESG - and using the foundation of an Integrity Screen initiated in Quantum's research and investment processes since 1996 - the Quantum India ESG Fund has exhibited that good leaders can deliver.
Table 1: When Leadership Delivers
| In USD | CY 2019* | CY 2020 | CY 2021 YTD | Since Inception** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum India ESG Equity Fund | +1.9% | +22.7% | +7.8% | +18.0% |
| MSCI India ESG Leaders Index | +4.2% | +22.8% | +1.3% | +15.5% |
| Nifty 100 ESG Index | +2.3% | +19.9% | +4.8% | +14.9% |
| BSE-30 Index | +3.0% | +14.2% | +1.0% | +10.1% |
| BSE-200 Index | +1.8% | +15.0% | +5.6% | +12.5% |
| Average Cash Position of QIESG# (End of period = 5.2%) | 13.5% | 6.7% | 5.2% | 8.3% |
*From July 12, 2019 to December 31, 2019
** Since inception numbers are from the inception of Quantum India ESG Equity Fund i.e. July 12, 2019
Admittedly, it has been a short ride of 22 months of a track record - less than 2 years. Past performance can never be a guide to future performance or likely behavioural patterns of a portfolio, but it could be a gauge of success for leaders. Typically, a leader has to survive a cycle of good and bad times and show followers that leadership skills are intact across market cycles and economic environments. The Quantum India ESG Fund did participate in the surge in stock markets as investors bought into the pre-Covid India growth story; then the Fund experienced the collapse in stock markets after the 1st wave of Covid in March 2020; and, finally, the Fund saw the recovery phase since the results of clinical trials of various vaccines were announced.
The leadership skills of these highly-rated ESG companies, based on Quantum's proprietary research processes, have been tested across good and bad times.
The results suggest that good leaders, who assimilate information, assess the situation, evaluate the options, make a decision, and then execute with firmness of good intent can deliver for their followers and investors. Those companies whose leadership fails to recognize the new era of ESG signifying the changed demands of their followers are not likely to have a good future. Look around you - and think about this as you cast your next investment rupee.
Suggested allocation in Quantum Mutual Funds (after keeping safe money aside)
| Quantum Long Term Equity Fund, Quantum Equity Fund of Funds, Quantum ESG India Fund | Quantum Gold Savings Fund | Quantum Liquid Fund | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Why you
should own it: |
An investment for the future and an opportunity to profit from the long term economic growth in India | A hedge against a global financial crisis and an "insurance" for your portfolio | Cash in hand for any emergency uses but should get better returns than a savings account in a bank |
| Suggested allocation | 80% in total in both; Maybe 15% in QLTEF, 10% in Q ESG and 75% in QEFOF | 20% | Keep aside money to meet your expenses for 12 months to 3 years |
| Disclaimer: Past performance may or may not be sustained in the future. Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, fluctuation in NAV's and uncertainty of dividend distributions. Please read offer documents of the relevant schemes carefully before making any investments. Click here for the detailed risk factors and statutory information" | |||

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "When Leaders Deliver". Click here!
Comments are moderated by Equitymaster, in accordance with the Terms of Use, and may not appear
on this article until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.
In the meantime, you may want to share this article with your friends!