Golden Truth: Track that Error - Outside View by Chirag Mehta

Helping You Build Wealth With Honest Research
Since 1996. Try Now

  • MyStocks


Login Failure
(Please do not use this option on a public machine)
  Sign Up | Forgot Password?  

Golden Truth: Track that Error
Mar 3, 2011

We're happy! Growing awareness about Gold ETFs as a convenient means of investing in gold, has led to a surge in demand for the product. Great!But due to a rise in demand, we have also seen many new funds mushrooming. With multiple choices and limited knowledge, which fund should you pick? How should you address this confusion? And as one of the most significant aspects of an ETF is tracking error - how do you monitor this and invest in the right fund?

We don't have all the answers, but we have tried to explain a little of what we know. Read on.

In Q4 of 2010, the World Gold Council reported "Indian investors increased their purchases of gold bullion as the rising price generated considerable fresh demand, without (as would usually be expected at record price levels) attracting higher levels of profit-taking." What this statement plainly proves is that the demand for gold has been on the rise. And we are also seeing a trend that Indian investors are increasingly becoming comfortable with the concept of Gold ETFs. We're seeing investors now understanding that - Gold ETFs are as good as gold- and not dismissing the avenue as a mere paper product; all in all fast making Gold ETFs a preferred investment choice for gold.

So where do you stand in all of this? With the increase in the number of funds available for investment, you should be ready with the correct data so that you invest in the right fund. Hence, if an investor wants to invest in ETFs, "Tracking Error" should be the foremost factor to be considered.

For starters: What is Tracking Error?

Technically, Tracking Error is defined as the annualized standard deviation of the difference in returns between the Index fund and its target Index. However simply put, Tracking Error is a measure of how closely an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) follows the index to which it is benchmarked. The lower the tracking error, the closer are the returns of the fund to that of the target Index.

The tracking error indicates how closely the fund you have purchased, is tracking the Index. Fund Inflows / Outflows, Expense Ratio and Cash Levels maintained for liquidity purpose are various factors that affect tracking error.

Technical reasons and non-availability of data make it challenging for an investor to calculate Tracking Error by themselves. To solve this issue, it is important that fund houses are transparent about their funds and make the tracking error available to their investors with the purpose of aiding their decision making process.

CRISIL recently (February 2011) released a report on Tracking Error. I contacted CRISIL to better understand their methodology, and found out that the index used by them has been taken from NCDEX. NCDEX is a commodity exchange and uses parameters that differ from that of fund houses, which use calculations prescribed by SEBI.

It polls spot prices from various participants across the physical market and takes an average of the spot prices after removing the outlier quotes. This price is polled from participants across domestic markets and these could differ on accounts of exclusion / inclusion of factors like Octroi, Stamp duty and VAT depending on the location of the market. Whereas all these factors are accounted for valuation of gold for Gold ETFs.

This price calculated by NCDEX also differs from the international parity price based on local demand and supply factors. Whereas the price calculated for valuation of Gold ETFs is based on the international parity price calculated using London AM Fix prices and RBI reference rate which is not impacted by local demand and supply factors.

Since these are not equal comparisons, there is a high chance of generating incorrect results which can inflate or deflate tracking error. There is bound to be a difference between the values calculated by the fund house and CRISIL and this difference also keeps fluctuating resulting in higher tracking errors. The graph included in the report issued by CRISIL mentions the Quantum Gold Fund ETF's 1 year tracking error for the period ending 31st January 2011 as 0.3436%. This could be alarming to our investors since the tracking error calculated by us for the same period for Quantum Gold Fund is 0.0027%.

Chart: Fluctuation in the difference between valuation of Gold for QGF and NCDEX spot prices for Gold
Source: Bloomberg, QuantumAMC

Changing even one of the parameters leads to a change in the tracking error. When one of the parameters- CIF premium (that is added to the gold price before converting it to Indian Rupees) is changed, its impact on tracking error is noticeable.

Tracking error for 1 year ending 31st January 2011
 Tracking error for 1 year ending 31st January 2011
Calculated using CIF -10 cents0.002708%
Calculated using CIF +10 cents0.002667%
Calculated using CIF +20 cents0.002650%
Calculated using CIF +50 cents0.002614%
Calculated using CIF +100 cents0.002606%
Source: QuantumAMC

*CIF for the above calculations is based on the premium used for valuation of gold for Quantum Gold ETF

As seen in the above table, you will notice that even a small change makes a significant impact on the fund's value. Errors like these add to the investor's confusion and distort their decision making process. CRISIL explained that due to unavailability of standardized data on the underlying benchmark and unavailability of tracking errors of all funds made them select NCDEX prices for calculation of tracking error. Also, there weren't any disclaimers suggesting that the data provided can be expressed differently in an actual scenario.

We recommend that, any research institution attempting to calculate tracking error for gold ETFs, should ask for the tracking errors with verifiable information from the fund houses and such factual data should be willingly provided by the fund houses. In case there is any institution that refrains from providing the data, they should not be considered for comparison purposes. I am sure that investors are wise enough to understand the possible reasons for the institution's resistance in providing data.

I appeal to all investors in Quantum Gold Fund that we have been highly transparent in the way we manage the fund and we always try to disclose all the data relevant to the investors. In case you require further details or performance measures regarding our fund, please do write to us and we will be more than happy to provide all the relevant details.

Hence, dear investor, please ensure that you take informed decisions when it comes to investing your hard earned savings.

Chirag Mehta is Fund Manager, Commodities for Quantum Mutual Fund and manages the Quantum Gold Fund ETF and the Quantum Gold Savings Fund among others.


The views expressed in this Article are the personal views of the author Chirag Mehta and not views of Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited(AMC), Quantum Trustee Company Private Limited (Trustee) and Quantum Mutual Fund (Fund). The AMC, Trustee and the Fund may or may not have the same view and DO not endorse this view.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Golden Truth: Track that Error". Click here!


More Views on News

Is Gold Headed to Rs 65,000? (Views On News)

Jun 4, 2021

India's #1 trader Vijay Bhambwani answers your queries on gold.

Why Gold Hit Lower Circuit (Fast Profits Daily)

Jan 11, 2021

Were you shocked that bullion prices hit lower circuits on Friday on the MCX? Find out why it happened...

My Top 5 Gold ETFs (Fast Profits Daily)

Dec 28, 2020

In this video, I'll tell you my list of the top 5 gold ETFs in India.

Gold ETFs or Gold Bullion? (Fast Profits Daily)

Dec 14, 2020

Should you buy gold in physical form or in electronic form? Find out in this video.

Should You Buy Platinum or Gold or Silver Now? (Fast Profits Daily)

Aug 24, 2020

The precious metals market is booming but are all precious metals a buy? Find out in this video...

More Views on News

Most Popular

These 5 Penny Stocks are Held by Rakesh Jhunjhunwala. Worth a Look? (Views On News)

Jan 18, 2022

Rakesh Jhunjhunwala is holding these penny stocks in his portfolio for several years now.

4 'Digital India' Stocks to Add to Your 2022 Watchlist (Views On News)

Jan 28, 2022

Digitisation is touching every aspect of our lives. As this megatrend picks up pace, there will be companies benefitting from it for years to come.

Tech Mahindra's CTC Acquisition: Too Expensive? (Views On News)

Jan 18, 2022

Tech Mahindra's acquisition of European IT-company fails to excite investors.

5 Hidden Tata Group Companies to Add to Your Watchlist (Views On News)

Jan 18, 2022

Here's all you need to know about these five Tata group stocks that aren't as popular as the others.

Insiders are Buying into these 6 Stocks Aggressively. More Details here... (Views On News)

Jan 19, 2022

While promoter holding is an important parameter, it should not be the sole reason for buying a stock.


Become A Smarter Investor
In Just 5 Minutes

Multibagger Stock Guide 2022
Get our special report Multibagger Stocks Guide (2022 Edition) Now!
We will never sell or rent your email id.
Please read our Terms