Warren Buffett Goes Down With the Credit Rating Agencies - Outside View

Helping You Build Wealth With Honest Research
Since 1996. Try Now

  • MyStocks


Login Failure
(Please do not use this option on a public machine)
  Sign Up | Forgot Password?  

Warren Buffett Goes Down With the Credit Rating Agencies
Jun 9, 2010

Warren Buffet recently stood up to defend credit rating agencies for their hand in laying the foundation of the global financial crisis. Here is what the Taipan Publishing Group has to say about it in one of their recent articles. We have received permission from the Taipan Group to publish this article. Taipan Publishing Group is a division of consumer newsletter publisher, Agora, Inc., an international holding company for various publishers of financial, health, travel and special interest books and newsletters. The bad behavior of the credit ratings agencies was a root cause of the global financial crisis. As TV pundit Charlie Gasparino put it, they have "the most corrupt business model in corporate America."

The "big three" credit ratings houses - Moody's, Fitch and S&P - have a special mandate from the government. They alone have official sanction to determine the creditworthiness of an investable debt instrument.

This mandate equates to a highly profitable monopoly because many bond buyers - pension funds, institutional houses and the like - can only purchase "investment grade" debt. And the only ones that can officially determine a debt issue to be "investment grade" are Moody's, Fitch and S&P.

So how did this contribute to the global financial crisis? Simple. The credit ratings agencies threw due diligence out the window in order to gorge on profit. They went around stamping "triple A" on garbage bags full of subprime crap because they were paid handsome fees to do so. (Ratings analysts who felt unsure about this course of action were pressured to either shut up or find another job.)

At the height of the housing bubble, it was the credit ratings agencies that performed the seeming magic trick of turning investment bank garbage into gold. Without their rubber stamp, investors would not have had an excuse to gorge on the supposedly safe "triple A" securities that were, in reality, radioactive toxic waste.

Not only did the credit ratings agencies fail utterly in their one important job - determining the risk of an investable debt instrument - they topped it off with an uncanny knack for making every debt crisis worse. Here is the formula the big three inevitably followed:

  • First, keep an investment grade rating on a company (or a country) for far too long.
  • Second, completely ignore the mounting danger signs as the debt situation deteriorates.
  • Third, wait until the most useless moment to act (after the crisis is already in full bloom).
  • Fourth, issue a "downgrade" at the worst possible moment, making the whole situation implode.

The ratings agencies are so big, dumb and dangerous it is hard to fathom. Their "stamps of approval" are useless, except in providing government-mandated cover to lethargic investors too lazy to do their own homework. And rating downgrades generally come at the worst time... far too late to actually be useful, except as a sort of collapse-inducing doomsday device with fear and panic already mounting.

The credit ratings agencies are only in business because of the government. They are the culmination of a dumb idea, brought to full bloom with catastrophic consequences.

And yet, Warren Buffett seems to think the credit ratings agencies are wonderful. Just like Goldman Sachs.

A Rich Irony
Last week, Warren Buffett appeared before a special panel, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, by order of government subpoena. The Oracle of Omaha was required to testify as a major shareholder of Moody's one of the big three ratings agencies.

It was a sad spectacle. Buffett trashed his own reputation by way of his poor defense of Moody's, and made himself look naïve and incompetent in the process.

This is the second post-crisis episode in which Buffett has flushed a large chunk of reputational capital down the toilet. The first was when he decided to vocally defend Goldman Sachs (or rather, his $5 billion stake in Goldman Sachs) in light of actions that were illegal at worst and shockingly sleazy at best.

Many times over the years, Buffett has referred to derivatives as "weapons of mass destruction." He has also expounded repeatedly and at length on the virtues of reputation, honesty and fair dealing.

So it is truly a rich irony that, if one were to draw up a list of derivative-wielding "mass destruction" finalists whose actions directly facilitated the global financial crisis, Goldman Sachs and Moody's - the very entities Buffett now chooses to defend - would have space near the top.

It would be one thing if Buffett were just another amoral capitalist. No one particularly notices when, say, the CEO of a large investment bank wriggles around uncomfortably like a worm on a hook.

But Buffett was supposed to be different. He was supposed to be the folksy everyman investor writ large... the down home investor's ambassador of hamburgers and Cherry Coke and mom and apple pie.

After years of cultivating an aw shucks, "Uncle Warren" persona, seeing the truth for what it is feels like a Hall of Fame baseball player admitting to steroid use. The hero was artificial... the persona was fake... and the letdown is sad.

Can't Afford It
Something else to consider: You may have heard a time or two (or three) that it would be prudent to invest like Warren Buffett.

MCO (Moody's Corp.) NYSE

With all due respect, you might want to forget that advice. Why? Because unless you're a billionaire, you probably can't afford it.

As of last week, Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway was still a majority shareholder in Moody's with roughly 13% of the company (down from a stake of more than 20%).

I don't know about you, but I'm certainly not rich enough to hold onto investments as they decline seventy percentin value. Buy and hold might sound good in theory - but then so does the halfwit observation that "eventually, the market always comes back."

There is a time to buy and a time to sell, even for the longest of long-term investors. One would think that's a hard point to overlook.

At the hearing last week, Buffett's excuse for Moody's, and for himself, was that he missed the housing bubble completely. "There was the greatest bubble I've ever seen in my life ... Very, very few people could appreciate the bubble and that's the nature of bubbles," Buffett said.

Apparently Buffett couldn't appreciate the bubble either... even though he has been investing for six decades, has lived through all manner of bubbles, and reads multiple newspapers every single day.

The big ratings agencies "made a mistake that virtually everybody in the country made," Buffett lamely added to his and Moody's defense. As if there were no warning signs, no table pounding, no vocal cries of concern. (In truth there were plenty.) Buffett, the investor who sees everything and thinks deeply on most everything, somehow missed it all.

And remember: In regard to mania blindness, this is the Oracle of Omaha we are talking about here... someone who has been preaching on the dangers of excess leverage and speculation since Hector was a pup. Last week that same great student of experience tried to pass himself off as deaf, dumb and blind.

Perhaps the worst thing of all, though, is this: When pressed on his lack of influence over Moody's strategic decision making - given that Berkshire has long been the company's largest and most powerful shareholder - Buffett took the "I really had no clue" defense, pointing out he had no idea where Moody's headquarters was even located.

Buffett's further responses under pointed questioning suggested that, as the ultimate passive shareholder, he has no idea what Moody's management is even up to the vast majority of the time. Whether genuine or no, that's one heck of an embarrassing defense!

So, based on this latest round of evidence, the 21st-century Buffett method of investing seems to involve 1) holding large investments through periods of dramatic decline, 2) completely ignoring epic bubbles even as they blow all around, with credit and leverage danger signs screaming off the charts, and 3) taking such a passive monitoring role as to have zero awareness of the fact that management has gone off the reservation. Ouch...

Be Your Own Shepherd
Is there a deeper lesson in all this, other than "Warren Buffett is no saint?" Yes.

Your humble editor would argue that, in light of the Oracle's feet of clay, it is best to recognize that no one is a saint... and anyone who portrays himself as much should be viewed with a skeptical eye.

Who among us is so gifted and anointed that they should be lifted up as an icon, their every word taken as gospel? No one, that's who. Ideas and arguments should be taken at face value - respected for their logic and sensibility or rejected for lack of same. What the world needs more of is independent thinkers... fewer shepherds and sharper sheep.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Warren Buffett Goes Down With the Credit Rating Agencies". Click here!

3 Responses to "Warren Buffett Goes Down With the Credit Rating Agencies"


Jun 18, 2010

My 2 cents on this matter:
a) It is indeed disappointing to be let down by a hero. I (and millions of other investors, I'm sure) respected him greatly not just for his intellect and wisdom, but perhaps even more for his sense of ethics and social responsibility. So, to not hear him at least admit / recognize that there are serious conflicts of interest in the business models of big investment banks (like GS) and rating agencies (like Moody's) was very disappointing.
b) However, his recent ethical choices do not negate the value of his investing principles. Margin of safety, competitive advantage, focussing on businesses with good economics, et al still remain fundamental to intelligent investing. So we still have to respect the man's contribution in helping people become better investors.



Jun 16, 2010

Two points completely messed and missed which define Warren Buffet:
1. He is not a saint but an astute businessman. He is considered a capitalist. At the end of the day he would invest wherever he gets bang for his buck and thats what an intelligent investor is supposed to do.
2. Buffet looks more to be a businessman who takes stock market route for acquiring businesses and yes he is man enough to stand 70% decline and still remain invested. A businessman's perspective can be very different about owning a business. He doesn't think like a punter and so punters can excuse him please.

You can only understand what your mind is capable of !! why blame Buffet !! Learn more and if you can't just shut up, simple!


Sarit Sahadevan

Jun 12, 2010

Why on earth have you come to the conclusion that Warren Buffet portrays himself as a saint. He never has. It's we the people who have created this image & were quite justified in doing so, considering his reputation. As far as not being ableto handle a 70% decline in your portfolio, well, Buffet can. He has done so in the past(when he managed less money) & will do so in the future(when he will manage more money). He is different from us as an investor & has always tried to dissuade people from copying him. Yet we still do. Is that his fault? As far as Buffet missing the housing bubble, so did the whole world. Lets face it, there were'nt many who predicted the crash of 2008. Even Buffet is only human. I belive Agora (ie Bill Bonner & Addison Wiggan) do not have the guts to publicly criticize Buffet, so it's "Divisions" (in this case Taipan) do it in it's place. I follow Agora's publications & I track Buffet too. This criticism of Buffet is justified in letter but not in sprit & is in bad taste. By the way, who cares if he did not remember where Moddy's HQ was? Could you, if you had significant stakes in over 70 companies?

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Warren Buffett Goes Down With the Credit Rating Agencies". Click here!

More Views on News

Best Banking & PSU Debt Funds to Invest in 2021 (Outside View)

Apr 13, 2021

PersonalFN explains the outlook for Banking & PSU Debt funds and the best Banking & PSU Debt funds that can be considered for investment in 2021.

India: Recovery Stalled by Vaccine Games? (The Honest Truth)

Apr 13, 2021

Ajit Dayal on how India's vaccine strategy will impact the markets.

Why Did the Market Crash on Monday? (Fast Profits Daily)

Apr 13, 2021

In this video, I'll you what I think is the real reason behind yesterday's market crash.

The Next Set of Smallcap Winners (Profit Hunter)

Apr 13, 2021

Price is the only due diligence one might require to buy this business.

Should Mutual Fund Investors Worry About Partial Lockdown? (Outside View)

Apr 12, 2021

PersonalFN explains whether the second wave of COVID-19 infections impact your mutual fund investments.

More Views on News

Most Popular

4 Stocks to Make Your Portfolio Immune to the Second Covid Wave (Profit Hunter)

Apr 6, 2021

Rather than predicting the market, successful investing is more about preparing well and placing your bets accordingly.

If the Market Falls, I Will Do This... (Fast Profits Daily)

Apr 1, 2021

What should you do if the market falls? In this video, I'll tell you what I will do.

The Indian Real Estate Party Has Just Begun (Profit Hunter)

Apr 1, 2021

A favourable demand supply scenario makes a strong case for real estate prices.

The Dilemma of Investing in Bharti Airtel Views On News (Views On News)

Apr 1, 2021

Rahul Shah on whether Bharti Airtel will emerge as the next big thing in the Indian stock market

India: Recovery Stalled by Vaccine Games? (The Honest Truth)

Apr 13, 2021

Ajit Dayal on how India's vaccine strategy will impact the markets.


India's #1 Trader
Reveals His Secrets

Secret To Increasing Your Trading Profits Today
Get this Special Report,
The Secret to Increasing Your Trading Profits Today, Now!
We will never sell or rent your email id.
Please read our Terms


Apr 13, 2021 (Close)