Sign up for Equitymaster's free daily newsletter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get access to our latest Multibagger guide (2018 Edition) on picking money-making stocks.

This is an entirely free service. No payments are to be made.

Download Now Subscribe to our free daily e-letter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get this complimentary report.
We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
Keep it tight, Rajan - Outside View by S.S. TARAPORE

Helping You Build Wealth With Honest Research
Since 1996. Try Now

  • MyStocks


Login Failure
(Please do not use this option on a public machine)
  Sign Up | Forgot Password?  

Keep it tight, Rajan
Sep 20, 2013

In a carefully crafted statement, RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan has set out his vision statement for the bank.

On the conduct of monetary policy, he drew his mandate from the RBI Act of 1934 and said: "The primary role of the central bank, as the Act suggests, is monetary stability, that is, to sustain confidence in the value of the country's money.

Ultimately, this means low and stable expectations of inflation, whether the inflation stems from domestic sources or from changes in the value of the currency, from supply constraints or demand pressures". This, in a nutshell, is Rajan's unequivocal mission statement.

On September 12, Rajan set up a Committee under Deputy Governor Urjit Patel to: (i) review the objectives and conduct of monetary policy in a globalised and highly inter-connected environment, (ii) to recommend an appropriate nominal anchor, (iii) to review the operating framework and (iv) to identify impediments to monetary policy transmission.

For many years, monetary policy was conducted in a closed economy model and external sector problems were dealt with by an intricate web of controls. With the opening up of the external sector, monetary-fiscal weaknesses quickly spilt onto the external sector. The collective unconscious, however, believes in the efficacy of controls.

Nominal Anchor

During the Rangarajan Governorship (1992-97), the RBI came close to setting a nominal anchor. The Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) was the pole star and there was overt support by the Government and the RBI to monetary targeting, and pre-eminence was given to inflation control. Subsequently, there was increased emphasis on multiple objectives which resulted in the rejection of the Narasimham Advisory Group (2000) recommendation for a monetary policy mandate with primacy to inflation control. A nominal GDP anchor would work adversely to the basic intention. For instance, a nominal GDP growth of, say, 15 per cent could be made up of an 8 per cent real growth and a 7 per cent inflation. Alternatively, it could work towards a 5 per cent real growth and a 10 per cent inflation rate. Thus, a nominal GDP growth would not be an efficient anchor.

To the extent the inflation rate is made the nominal anchor, it would be best to move away from the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) and use the headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) - the standard measure the world over.

The RBI should not shy away from the CPI as the nominal anchor merely because food and fuel are predominant in this index. In fact, this should be the precise reason for using the CPI Index as the nominal anchor. While the objective should be set out jointly by the Government and the RBI, inflation control should take precedence and the other objectives, if any, should be subordinate to this.

Operating Framework

While reviewing the operating framework, the Mohanty Working Group Report (2011) should be revisited. It would be best to move away from a corridor to a single policy repo rate. While the reverse repo is not of significance at the present time, this facility is akin to giving interest on excess cash balances. This goes against the spirit of the law which does not allow payment of interest on required cash balances. Payment of interest on cash reserve ratio (CRR) balances attenuates the CRR. This is a mortal sin of central banking. Having redeemed itself, the RBI should not lapse into sinning. The RBI should not restrict itself to the short end of the yield curve - akin to the US ‘‘Bills only Doctrine'' of the 1950s. In a well functioning system, the long rate should be the average of the future anticipated short rates, adjusted for risk and uncertainty. As such, an inverted yield curve cannot be sustained over a long period of time (issues relating to monetary policy and internal debt management need separate detailed examination).

Monetary Policy Committee

While a formally constituted MPC would be desirable, the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission (FSLRC) model renders the RBI ineffective the way the Committee is proposed to be set up, with predominantly government-appointed external members. By providing for a veto by the Governor, the MPC becomes ineffective.

It would be preferable to follow the Bank of England model of five internal members and four external members but there should be no veto for the Governor.

Given the high current inflation rate and the large CAD, notwithstanding the US Fed decision on September 18 not to taper the quantitative easing, the RBI would do well not to ease monetary policy today. The differential between the yields on US gilts and Indian gilts is insufficient to allow for inflation rate differentials. Any signal today by the RBI of monetary easing could trigger an outflow by foreign investors from the debt market.

Hence, it is hoped that Governor Rajan would not reduce policy interest rates or reserve requirements (including the 99 per cent daily requirement for the cash reserve ratio) and not expand refinance facilities. If the RBI eases monetary policy today and the Fed tightens its policy at the next review, the RBI would find the imperatives that much more difficult to tighten monetary policy a few weeks later.

While the Foreign Currency Non-Resident (Banks) Deposit scheme (FCNRB) and overseas borrowings by banks have been given temporary support via RBI swap facilities, this violates our 1994 commitment on current account convertibility and should be withdrawn immediately. Besides, it exposes the RBI to losses of an estimated Rs 60,000 crore which would be self-immolation.

With the Fed's decision not to taper quantitative easing, the RBI should refrain from easing the monetary policy today.

Please Note: This article was first published in The Hindu Business Line on September 20, 2013.

This column, Maverick View is authored by Savak Sohrab Tarapore. Mr. Tarapore, is an economist and he runs his own Multi-Language Syndicated Column. Mr. Tarapore's other column, which appears in The Freepress Journal, is titled Common Voice.


The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Keep it tight, Rajan". Click here!


More Views on News

Two Meetings That Nailed the Idea of Owning Brilliant Smallcaps Without Buying Them (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

Mar 22, 2018

Certain blue chips hold the potential of delivering returns comparable to small-cap stocks. With these stocks, you can get the best of both worlds.

What They Forgot to Tell You About Sensex at One Lakh (Profit Hunter)

Nov 29, 2017

Stocks that could beat Sensex returns in the long term.

Is Your Bank Gambling With Your Money? These Banks Should be Declared Dangerous... (Profit Hunter)

Jul 17, 2018

Tanushree Banerjee bets you would not want to leave your money with these unsafe banks...

Your Rescue Plan from the Cave of Poor Quality Stocks (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

Jul 17, 2018

And there will be no getting trapped with Amtek, Vakrangee, or Manpasand like stocks.

2019 Lok Sabha Elections and the Perils of Populism (Vivek Kaul's Diary)

Jul 17, 2018

Evidence from around the world shows that populism can only lead to more populism and this is clearly not good news for the Indian economy.

More Views on News

Most Popular

The Real Truth About India's FDI, Beyond WhatsApp(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

Jul 4, 2018

The FDI numbers do not look very impressive once we adjust for repatriations as well as the overall growth in the economy.

How to Avoid a 90% Loss Suffered by This Super Investor(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

Jul 12, 2018

Blindly following super investors is a dangerous game to play. Here's how you can avoid such mistakes.

The Answer to Your Wealth Worries: Small Caps (Especially Now)(Profit Hunter)

Jul 10, 2018

If you're worried about the markets - you are on the wrong track. This is opportunity - put your wealth-building hat on, instead - Richa shows you how...

New Fund Offer - ICICI Prudential Pharma Healthcare and Diagnostics Fund - Should You Invest?(Outside View)

Jul 6, 2018

ICICI AMC launches an open -ended equity fund following Pharma, Healthcare, Diagnostic and allied theme.

When Disappointment Panda is Around. Buy Quality Stock like This!(Chart Of The Day)

Jul 6, 2018

Buy Companies that can fight all kinds of Pandas and Bears in the long run.


Small Investments
BIG Returns

Zero To Millions Guide 2018
Get our special report, Zero To Millions
(2018 Edition) Now!
We will never sell or rent your email id.
Please read our Terms


Jul 17, 2018 03:37 PM