There's no denying that Vaibhav Suryavanshi is a rare talent. The young cricketer's ability to time the ball, find gaps, and clear the boundary with seemingly effortless power has drawn comparisons to the game's greats.
But if you watch closely, what sets him apart isn't just his natural ability-it's the sweat and toil behind the scenes. The highlight reel is a lie if you ignore the practice nets.
I read somewhere that he used to knock 600 balls in the nets every single day. That's 100 overs. Day in, day out. Rain or shine. And he doesn't just mindlessly throw the bat at them. He does it with the right technique, under the watchful eyes of his coach. Every defensive shot, every drive, every leave is deliberate. He is not guessing; he is executing a process.
Hard work. Direction. Discipline.
Investing works the same way.
Walk into any trading floor or scroll through any finance forum, and you will find people who spend 12 hours a day staring at screens, devouring news, tracking quarterly earnings, and drawing complex charts.
They bring enormous energy, intelligence, and study to Dalal Street-and still end up with losses instead of profits. Why?
It's because mere hard work isn't enough. In fact, hard work applied to the wrong process is worse than doing nothing. It amplifies losses.
To become the Vaibhav Suryavanshi of investing, you need the right framework. The right process. You need to stop swinging at every ball and start waiting for the one in your slot.
The Wrong Process: Swinging at Every Delivery
Let me give you a concrete example of the bubble. Smart engineers sold their homes to buywrong process. Meet Rajesh, a salaried professional with a high IQ and a passion for the stock market.
Rajesh wakes up at 6 AM to read three daily stock tips newsletters. By 9:15 AM, he has placed five orders based on "hot tips" from a Telegram channel. His process looks like hard work: he tracks 50 stocks, watches hourly charts, and sells the moment a stock drops 2% to "cut losses."
Last year, Rajesh heard that a small pharmaceutical company was awaiting USFDA approval for a blockbuster drug. Instead of valuing the business, he bought 1,000 shares at Rs 450-paying 40 times its average earnings-because a friend's cousin "had insider info."
There was no margin of safety. He ignored the company's debt pile and the fact that three similar approvals had been rejected in the past. The approval never came. The stock crashed to Rs 120. Rajesh lost 73% of his capital in four months.
What did Rajesh do wrong? He speculated, he paid above intrinsic value, and he ignored margin of safety. He was like a batsman charging down the pitch to every ball-seam, spin, or yorker-without reading the length.
Hard work? Absolutely. But directionless, undisciplined, and destructive.
The Right Process: Building an Innings Ball by Ball
Now meet Priya. Priya is not a finance wizard. She doesn't trade daily. She doesn't subscribe to tips.
But she has a process. Every quarter, she screens for companies that have three things: a return on equity consistently above 15% for ten years, a debt-to-equity ratio below 0.5, and a price that is at least 25% below her calculated intrinsic value (her margin of safety).
Two years ago, she found a mid-sized bank that had been mispriced. The market was punishing all banks because of a temporary NPAs scare. Priya calculated the bank's intrinsic value at Rs 600. The stock was trading at Rs 380. That's a 37% discount.
She bought in three tranches over six weeks, never committing more than 10% of her portfolio to any single idea.
Then the bank cleaned up its books. Bad loans were recognized and written off. New management focused on retail lending. Two years later, the stock trades at Rs 720.
Priya didn't predict the turnaround; she simply created a setup where she didn't need to be right about timing. Her margin of safety protected her if she was wrong. Her process ensured she only invested in businesses with durable moats.
That's Vaibhav Suryavanshi's approach: knock 600 balls in the nets (research) with the right technique (valuation framework) under supervision (mentorship or checklists). When the match comes, you don't innovate wildly. You trust your practice.
Why High-IQ Investors Fail
There are plenty of high-IQ, super-smart people in investing who don't get the results they want because they don't follow a course of action designed for success.
Intelligence without a process is like speed without steering. You'll hit something very fast.
Consider the dot-com bubble. Smart engineers sold their homes to buy Pets.com. They understood technology, but they understood neither valuation nor margin of safety.
Consider the crypto frenzy of 2021. Brilliant coders bought tokens with no earnings, no product, and no intrinsic value-simply because "price was going up." That's not investing. That's speculation with a spreadsheet.
The right process is boring. It involves reading annual reports, understanding competitive advantages, buying only when price is below value, and holding for years.
It requires that you admit what you don't know (your circle of competence). It demands that you leave room for error (margin of safety). And it forces you to say "no" to 99 opportunities so you can say "yes" to the one perfect ball.
On Dalal Street, as in cricket, talent starts the game-but process finishes it.
Happy investing.
Warm regards,
![]()
Rahul Shah
Editor and Research Analyst, Profit Hunter
Quantum Information Services Private Limited (Research Analyst)
manmohan khetan
May 28, 2026love your analogy. Nicely explained