Yes we can! (destroy a booming economy) - Straight from the Hip by J Mulraj
Investing in India - Straight from the Hip by J Mulraj
Yes we can! (destroy a booming economy) A  A  A

31 AUGUST 2013

Manmohan Singh's version of Obama's 'Yes We Can' speech: 'The one who is on my mind today is Mother India, who is thousands of years old'

"And tonight, I think about all that she's seen throughout her life - the heartache and the hope; the struggle and the progress; the times we were told that we couldn't destroy her currency's value, which was equal to the $ in 1947, and the economists who opined we cannot make her diminish in stature. I say to them: Yes we can diminish it.

"At a time when rational voices were warning us of the dangers to her economy from uncontrolled fiscal and current account deficits, we silenced them with leaky welfare schemes that allowed us to reach for the ballot, whilst destroying the country's balance sheet. I say to them: Yes we can destroy it.

"When there was optimism and entrepreneurship across the land, we saw a nation succumb to fear with policy paralysis, new subsidies, and new regulations that stifled growth. I say to them: Yes we can stifle it.

"When the corruption scandals and scams fell on our TV channels and threatened our crony capitalism world, she was there to witness a generation brainwashed to yield to corruption and lose its moral values. I say to them: Yes we can degrade values.

3 money-making opportunities in the current market crash....

On 15th February, 2008, we started our Small Cap Recommendation service...

And just 8 months post that, we closed the position with 87% returns!

We have had several such experiences where our recommended stocks did very well...

Earning returns like 250% in 2 years & 1 month, 288% in 2 Years & 5 months, 85% in 1 year and 6 month and even 139% in just about 7 months!

On the other hand, we have also seen some of the stocks not performing as we expected them to...

But then that's what investing in small caps is all about...

You make a lot of money in some stocks. And in others, you lose some money.

Overall, there is potential to earn big returns if you pick the right stocks and allocate about 5% - 10% of your portfolio to Small Caps.

And that's why we would like to invite you to try this service Absolutely Risk Free under our 30 days 100% Money-Back Policy.

To help you get started, we will also give you instant access to a Special Report with full information on 3 Dividend paying small caps... Absolutely Free!

Interested? Click here for full details...

As Finance Minister, Manmohan Singh led India out of the 1991 economic crisis. As Prime Minister, he has led India back into a bigger one.

Last week the Parliament passed two laws, the Food Security Bill, which seeks to provide subsidised grain to 67% of the population, even though 23% are below the poverty line and deserving of the subsidy, at an estimated annual cost of Rs 1.25 lac crores; and the Land Acquisition Bill, which seeks to provide farmers who sell their land to developers either for manufacture or for housing, a fair compensation for it, judged to be 4 times the (undefined) market rate for rural and 2 times for urban land. The non-definition will, of course, lead to uncertainty and further corruption.

There are other complications. The acquisition is subject to clearance by 80% of the owners in the case of a private acquirer and 70% in the case of a PPP project (public private partnership). It is also subject to a social impact audit, which, in turn, is to be approved by various layers.

This amount of uncertainty will make land acquisition for manufacture and for housing an impossibly arduous and uncertain process. It is doubtful whether foreign investors, with global choices, would wish to undergo it.

India's growth story was largely predicated upon the encashment of its demographic dividend. The young population, after getting jobs, would have spending power, and the economy would be led by a consumption driven boom for decades.

This story requires two ingredients. One is the provision of jobs. The second is the provision of housing for the young population, which will largely be a migratory one from rural to urban India. In India, agriculture has a 14% share of national income but over half the population depends on it. This is unjust and has to change. It will change when they get jobs and move to urban areas, where they will need housing.

The service sector has provided the jobs so far, but the potential to provide millions of jobs in future will necessarily come from the manufacturing sector.

So will the uncertainties, and the additional costs, emanating from the recently passed Land Acquisition Bill encourage the manufacturing sector to provide the jobs, and the real estate sector to build the homes, and if so, at what cost?

It was Martin Luther King who said "True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice that produces beggars needs restructuring"

Even prior to the Land Acquisition bill, some large foreign companies had expressed their intention to quit India. Nokia, chagrined at the reneging of the promise by Tamil Nadu State to refund it a 4% VAT, as agreed to, is one . Shell and Vodafone are fighting disputes relating to untenable tax demands.

It is little wonder that GDP growth for the quarter ended June has fallen to 4.4%, a 4 year low. The falling rupee will push up import cost of oil (an estimated 27%) and push up prices of petrol, diesel and power. This would lead to less consumption, hence lower consumption led GDP growth. The investment led growth will also slow down, thanks to a variety of factors including high interest rates and the higher cost, longer time, and uncertainties relating to land acquisition.

The root of all this is appallingly poor governance. As Martin Luther King said, quoted above, the polity should see that the edifice that produces beggars needs restructuring. The polity is, however, busy making Luddite laws and messing up the India story. In some States there is little law and order; politically connected people get away with bulldozing homes of doctors, without authorisation.

Even as they accuse and transfer a Government official of illegally demolishing a wall, which was held by a District Magistrate to be a false accusation. So a Government functionary is falsely accused of an illegal demolition, even as politically connected persons are not arrested for doing the same thing! The District Magistrate who dared to opine that the accusation was false, was transferred! Who would invest under these conditions?

The NSEL (National Spot Exchange Limited) imbroglio is getting murkier, and the Government is not doing what it ought to be doing.

One can compare the Sahara episode with NSEL. In the case of the two Sahara companies, there was a regulatory vacuum as the collective investment schemes floated by them fell in the regulatory chasm between RBI and Company Law Board. Neither of them thought of a joint consultation and intervention, a criminal neglect of duty.

Similarly, in the case of NSEL, the exchange was allowed to operate but without regulatory oversight. This makes the Government entirely culpable and responsible for the losses; it cannot evade its responsibility.

Now in the case of Sahara, the Government delegated the task to SEBI which approached the Supreme Court, got orders passed against the two Sahara companies, and has sequestered the personal properties of the promoters of the group.

Why can this not be followed in the case of NSEL?

What is the reason for such a lackadaisical and ineffectual response?

When it wants to, the Government has plenty of powers to use against a defaulting group. If it wants to. Ergo, its reluctance to act stems from the 'if' and not from the 'when'.

It is only in times of crisis that the Government is forced to take decisions that are sensible but politically deemed to be tough. The word 'deemed' is advisedly used. It is a perception that the decisions are politically tough, more than a reality.

One such is the discussion, now being held, to reduce Government stakes in public sector banks to below 51%. Among others, this column has been long suggesting that this is inevitable and necessary. But it is only when the Government is in a financial crisis that it thinks of such things.

Several commentators have mooted the idea of tapping into India's huge gold reserves, by offering private holders (including temples) a scheme by which they would earn a modest income on gold surrendered to the Government plus the option to get it back in future. It has taken years, and a CAD crisis, for the Government to think of mooting it.

Last week the sensex gained 100 points, mainly after the Prime Minister promised there would be no capital controls and the rupee bounced. For a Government that brings in retrospective changes in law, the confidence of investors is quite touching. The BSE-Sensex ended the week at 18,619. The NSE-Nifty was unchanged over the week, at 5,471.

Will the Government now have an amnesty scheme for foreign bank account holders? If so, will it result in a substantial inflow of foreign funds lying abroad? That would cause a rally in stock markets and in the Indian currency.

Otherwise, both would continue sinking, chasing the credibility of a Government that has driven a wedge in the India story.

J Mulraj is a stock market columnist and observer of long standing. His weekly column on stock markets has run for over 27 years. An MBA from IIM Calcutta, he has been a member of the BSE. He is Conference Head - India, for Euromoney. A keen observer of events and trends, he writes in a lucid yet readable style and takes up issues on behalf of the individual investor. Nothing pleases him more than a reader who confesses having no interest in stock markets yet being a reader of his columns. His other interests include reading, both fiction and non-fiction, bridge, snooker and chess.

The views mentioned above are of the author only. Data and charts, if used, in the article have been sourced from available information and have not been authenticated by any statutory authority. The author and Equitymaster do not claim it to be accurate nor accept any responsibility for the same. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. Please read the detailed Terms of Use of the web site.
© Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited

Get Straight from the Hip
directly in your mail box.
Just enter your e-mail address » 

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Yes we can! (destroy a booming economy)". Click here!
7 Responses to "Yes we can! (destroy a booming economy)"
Sep 1, 2013
While the economy is tanking and the rupee is hitting new lows, the "not so loyal opposition" is busy undermining the functioning of the government. They are trying to figure out how to exploit this crisis so they can win the next election.
The government needs to convene an all parties task force where they try to find solutions to boost the economy. They should also get the business leaders involved since they were the architects of the 8% GDP growth a few years ago. It is not enough to announce actions in bits and pieces and hope that it will stabilize the rupee. The foreign investors are not stupid; they don't trust the government any more (the one in power and the opposition). They have been burned too many times.
I look forward to strong and well thought out strategy in the near future. There is no time to waste and be patient and hope the external factors will change..
Sep 1, 2013
People who suggest that govt.can pay interest on privately held gold kept as collateral aren't thinking straight.
Who would trust the keep it's word especially when it comes to gold?Didn't Morarji Desai bring in the Gold control act in 1962 banning private individuals from holding gold bullion?
What about Roosevelt and what he did in the US in the 30s?
By one stroke of a pen our politicians can say"Hey your gold is confiscated and cannot be returned.So,kiss
goodbye to it"

Sorry folks.My gold is safer with me than any govt.-the interest notwithstanding.
Like (1)
Purnima Toolsidass
Sep 1, 2013
It was under the leadership of the Congress Party that India won her freedom, at the cost of so many lives and suffering. Remembering Jawaharlal Mehru's 'Tryst with destiny' I wonder what he would have said had he been able to foresee the state of his beloved country today, and how the Party he headed has contributed to it! Like (1)
sultan fazelbhoy
Sep 1, 2013
One of the fundamental causes for the drift is LACK OF PATRIOTISM AND HONESTY IN the population at large. "Speed" money is common. Self before nation is equally common. Much will depend on the next PM. There are hopes in NaMo but he has not outlined his economic programme. Meanwhile the BJP, RSS and others of the same ilk feel that building a most glorious temple to divine Ram will be the panacea for all our ills ....
I want to suggest two pledges for all citizens: "I WILL NOT CHEAT, LIE OR BRIBE, NOR TOLERATE ANYONE WHO DOES" 2) "I AM AN INDIAN MUSLIM (... AS APPLICABLE) AND NOT A MUSLIM INDIAN" This says more than NaMo's recent posters
If black money is brought back it will solve the deficit in large measure. But will it be used carefully and honestly ??? I suggest the return should be used for setting up institutions for health care and education of girls in a rural area NOT of the black owner. This is to emphasise the UNITY of India . The owner should be permitted to retain 10% of his remittance for himself and 90% in an escrow account till such time as his project gets going. The project may be given the name of the owner if he/she so desires. This would be a more effective way of using black money and should be done speedily
Lastly, the Food Security bill may imporve living standards of many. Thier purchasing power and discretionary income will increase slowly but surely. This in turn will increase demand and stimulate the economy than the short sighted plethora of bills which are on the anvil and being delayed by Opposition parties
We are facing a Herculean task and we need a Gandhi or a Nelson Mandela to arouse each citizen to play his/her part HONESTLY AND WILLINGLY ... India can still be a great nation. A short final comment: delete religion from public activities and push it into the privacy of the home
Like (1)
Aug 31, 2013
Slowly, farm land is either being acquired or sold for industrial development. When farm land is reduced,agricultural production will reduce. A day will come when we will have to import farm produce. Younger generation of farmers are reluctant to work on farms. With the passing of Land Aquisition bill, the lure of money will attract the next generation of this community to sell of their lands and migrate to cities. When this money is spent, they will look for jobs. If they do not have the skills, they will be jobless. Lawlessness will spread.Unemployment will increase. Yes we can destroy the economy. Like (1)
Aug 31, 2013
Yes, India future is with Young generation. These old politicians, bureaucrats are taking us back to bankruptcy, we have to be little patient, recently people have shown, when the see things are not proper they thrown out many state govts, certainly, it is only question of time, our people will teach lesson. The Indian economy has grown not because of politicians and bureaucrats, it has grown from hard work done by many many young individuals and entrepreneurs and also farmers who feed us.
At present we are little helplessly
Indian economy will not be pushed back, it will come back form efforts young Indian aspirant population.
Like (1)
Aug 31, 2013
It may be a good plan to request the temples to fork over their gold reserves. But it won't happen. Unless requisitioning is brought back. Besides who will tear off the temple roof ? Further no temple will accept cash or bonds from this inept govt. Give them land and maybe it will work.
Like (1)
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Yes we can! (destroy a booming economy)". Click here!