Is Warren Buffett A Hypocrite? - The 5 Minute WrapUp by Equitymaster
Free Reports

Is Warren Buffett A Hypocrite?

Nov 20, 2015

In this issue:
» Do banks benefit from debt restructuring?
» More M&A's likely in the banking industry?
» ...and more!
Radhika Nabar, Managing Editor of ValuePro

A volatile stock market environment is always a tricky one for investors. And it especially gets tight for big investors and hedge fund managers who are under pressure to find 'winning' stocks for their portfolios. At times, it can get really nasty, and these hedge fund managers resort to verbal fights.

Case in point is Valeant Pharmaceuticals. The warring parties are Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital and Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway.

What have they been squabbling about?

Here are the facts: The stock of Valeant Pharmaceuticals has shed around 50% in the last one month. The company has come under fire for its dubious accounting practices and its hazy ties with specialty pharmacies, which are allegedly not above board.

Thus, Buffett's partner Munger has vocally denounced Valeant for its 'deeply immoral' practices. Ackman has taken considerable offense at this, which is not surprising considering that he is bullish on Valeant.

What is interesting, though, is the line of argument that he has taken to hit back at Munger and Buffett.

He has questioned Munger's criticism of Valeant when Berkshire has been a big investor in Coca-Cola. As reported in an article on Zerohedge, Ackman opines that Coca-Cola has probably done more to create obesity and diabetes on a global basis than any other company in the world.

So is Ackman right? Is Buffett really a hypocrite?

Despite his legendary status, Warren Buffett has courted his fair share of controversies. He did invest in Goldman Sachs in 2008, even if the investment bank did not meet the 'Buffet-would-buy' criteria.

More recently Buffett received a lot of flak for favouring investments in junk-food stocks, such as Coca-Cola, See's Candies, and Burger King to name a few.

However, we believe that Ackman may have gone a bit too far in his criticism.

If Valeant Pharma is indeed guilty of shady accounting practices, then it is a serious corporate governance issue. Businesses with corporate governance issues more often than not erode the wealth of their shareholders. The genuineness of financials and the overall business is always under question.

There is nothing to suggest that Coca-Cola has corporate governance issues. And there's no question the company's business model and brand power has resulted in multiplication of shareholder wealth. According to Buffett, the idea is to create brands rather than products. Because branded businesses are ultimately profitable businesses. And this is where Coca-Cola has done very well. Its strong brand power has meant that the company's operations throw up a lot of cash with very little investment and no debt on the books. And the company is also able to dole out healthy dividends to its shareholders.

So in that sense, Coca-Cola can hardly be compared to Valeant especially if the latter has resorted to accounting gimmicks to bolster its financials.

So in the current standoff between Ackman and Berkshire, we believe that the latter gets the upper hand.

Do you that Ackman is fair in criticizing Buffett's investment in Coca-Cola? Let us know your comments or share your views in the Equitymaster Club.

--- Advertisement ---
Understand This To Make Big Profits From Small Caps...

We'll say it right out... Some small caps have great potential!

But the key word here, as you might have noticed, is 'some'.

Finding those 'some' has been our goal for more than seven years.

And we have found small caps that have delivered returns such as 250% in two years, 110% in two years four months, 288% in two years five months, 124% in just seven months, and many more.

Now, YOU too can join us in finding and tapping into the huge potential that some small cap stocks possess.

To find out how click here...

03:03 Chart of the day

As the Indian banking system continues to grapple with stressed assets, the corporate debt restructuring mechanism has not been of much help to it. Under the corporate debt restructuring scheme, banks waive off the interest component or restructure interest rate downwards to aid defaulting corporate borrowers in loan repayment. As per the Corporate Debt Cell, 24 cases valued at Rs 193 billion have failed to exit successfully in the first half of the current financial year. Only four cases valued at Rs 18 billion have met with success during the same period.

As per the CDR Cell data, the success rate has been less than 35% for 530 cases approved for restructuring by bankers at the cell as on 30 September 2015. Reasons for failure in the CDR include inability by the promoter to bring in the required 2% of the restructured loan amount or poor monetization of non-core assets due to slow economic revival.

As per a survey by Ernst & Young, majority of bankers feel that the CDR forum has been misused by the corporate world. In the first half of the fiscal, the CDR cell has not received any fresh referrals for restructuring and has also not cleared any pending cases. Another reason for banks not being so forthcoming in restructuring new loans is the revised RBI provisions that require them to provide for restructured loans at par with non-performing loans.

Moreover, RBI has also provided a number of other options to banks to deal with stressed assets. These include joint lender forum mechanism for early recognition of stress and 5/25 refinancing scheme for extension of tenure in case of infrastructure projects. Recently, the central bank provided a more powerful tool in the form of strategic debt restructuring (SDR) to help banks clean up their balance sheets. Under the norms, banks have been empowered to convert debt into majority equity holding, change the management or sell assets to recover their dues.

SDR certainly scores over CDR in bringing large corporate borrowers in toeing the line of debt contracts. But banks will be faced with the challenge of finding appropriate buyers for assets within 18 months without compromising on the rights of minority shareholders.

Do banks benefit from debt restructuring?

Apart from giving banks more teeth in setting the house in order, RBI is also keen to infuse growth in the industry. After providing licenses to 11 payment banks and 10 small banks, the central bank has given nod for holding of more than 10% stake in banks by promoters or investors. However, the permission for a larger stake will be determined on the basis of the applicant's integrity, reputation and track record in financial matters and compliance of tax laws. The removal of the decades old cap of 5% of ownership in banks paves the way for mergers and acquisitions and a consolidation in the industry.


After a volatile morning session, the Indian stock markets gained ground in the subsequent hours led by intense buying activity among index heavyweights. At the time of writing, the BSE-Sensex was trading up by around 192 points. Gains were largely seen in IT and auto stocks.

04:55 Today's investment mantra

"If a business earns 18% on capital over 20 or 30 years, even if you pay an expensive looking price, you'll end up with one hell of a result". - Charlie Munger

This edition of The 5 Minute WrapUp is authored by Radhika Pandit (Research Analyst) and Madhu Gupta (Research Analyst).

Today's Premium Edition.

These Companies Run Their Business on Other Peoples' Money

A discussion on the cash conversion ratio, negative working capital and its significance...
Read On...Get Access

Recent Articles

Sintex's Auditor Resigns. How You Can Protect Yourself from Such Stocks July 20, 2018
While the attack on the bad corporate governance is an overhang in the near term...this can be a game-changer in the years to come.
These Are the Best Stocks for the Next Decade July 19, 2018
The start-up eco-system is disrupting each and every sector that we know of. How can Indian investors benefit from this?
Our Next Recommendation... from the Superinvestor Who Buys Right and Sits Tight July 18, 2018
At Smart Money Secrets, we're finally recommending a Buy on a stock bought by one of our superinvestors - Pulak Prasad.
Your Rescue Plan from the Cave of Poor Quality Stocks July 17, 2018
And there will be no getting trapped with Amtek, Vakrangee, or Manpasand like stocks.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Is Warren Buffett A Hypocrite?". Click here!

1 Responses to "Is Warren Buffett A Hypocrite?"


Nov 20, 2015

No that's an absolutely stupid accusation by Ackman.

If Ackman in his lifetime has never ever eaten Burger King or drank Coke or for that matter eaten cake, chocolates made by Cadbury's Nestle and Lindt and then there are the oily chips of Lays, cheese, butter, etc. then he has a point there otherwise, his accusations are very childish and unwarranted and what about those multinationals that make cigarettes and beer and other alcholohic beverages.

C'mon Ackman, give us a break !! Find some valid and mature argument befitting your age and stature to take on the mighty Munger and Buffet.

Like (1)
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Is Warren Buffett A Hypocrite?". Click here!
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Equitymaster"/"Company") was incorporated on October 25, 2007. Equitymaster is a joint venture between Quantum Information Services Private Limited (QIS) and Agora group. Equitymaster is a SEBI registered Research Analyst under the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014 with registration number INH000000537.

An independent research initiative, Equitymaster is committed to providing honest and unbiased views, opinions and recommendations on various investment opportunities across asset classes.

There are no outstanding litigations against the Company, it subsidiaries and its Directors.

For the terms and conditions for research reports click here.

Details of Associates are available here.

  1. 'subject company' is a company on which a buy/sell/hold view or target price is given/changed in this Research Report.
  2. Neither Equitymaster, Research Analyst or his/her relative have any financial interest in any of the subject companies.
  3. Equitymaster's Associate has financial interest in Hindustan Unilever.
  4. Equitymaster's Associates do not have financial interest in any other subject company mentioned herein.
  5. Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have actual/beneficial ownership of one percent or more securities of the subject company at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the research report.
  6. Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of the research report.
  1. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  2. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company in the past twelve months.
  3. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  4. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for products or services other than investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.
  5. Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation or other benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the research report.
  1. The Research Analyst has not served as an officer, director or employee of the subject company.
  2. Equitymaster or the Research Analyst has not been engaged in market making activity for the subject company.
Definitions of Terms Used:
  1. Buy recommendation: This means that the investor could consider buying the concerned stock at current market price keeping in mind the tenure and objective of the recommendation service.
  2. Hold recommendation: This means that the investor could consider holding on to the shares of the company until further update and not buy more of the stock at current market price.
  3. Buy at lower price: This means that the investor should wait for some correction in the market price so that the stock can be bought at more attractive valuations keeping in mind the tenure and the objective of the service.
  4. Sell recommendation: This means that the investor could consider selling the stock at current market price keeping in mind the objective of the recommendation service.
If you have any feedback or query or wish to report a matter, please do not hesitate to write to us.