Sign up for Equitymaster's free daily newsletter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get access to our latest Multibagger guide (2017 Edition) on picking money-making stocks.

This is an entirely free service. No payments are to be made.

Download Now Subscribe to our free daily e-letter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get this complimentary report.
We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
"I strongly feel that the so called old economy companies are not being given their due..." - Views on News from Equitymaster
  • E-MAIL
  • A  A  A
  • Jun 13, 2000

    "I strongly feel that the so called old economy companies are not being given their due..."

    Mr. R. Ravimohan started his career with ICICI where he held several assignments in project appraisal, systems designing, credit administration and merchant banking. He also set up the country's first electronic stock exchange the OTC Exchange of India. At present, he is the Managing Director of Crisil, India's leading credit agency and among the top five credit rating agencies in the world. Crisil has a strategic business alliance with Standard and Poor's Rating Services, USA, which is the world's leading rating agency.

    Mr. Ravimohan has trained as a chemical engineer and completed the Advanced Management Programs from Harvard Business School.

    In the first of a two part interview to equitymaster he spoke about the state of the economy, expressed his concerns on the prevailing over capacity across commodity industries and commented on the current software sector valuations.

    EQM: What is your opinion on the economy, given the fact that neither the non-oil imports nor the non food credit have grown dramatically and overall a consensus seems to be emerging that the interest rates have bottomed out. Are we in the same stage where we were last year or is there a dramatic change taking place...?

    Mr. Ravimohan: Not a dramatic change but I think the changes are not very positive. I would say that the external front is weaker than before but it is not anything to worry about. But certainly I think the pressure on the rupee would continue to be there. Crisil has predicted that the rupee would go to Rs 46 to a dollar by the end of the year. We have also been predicting that the interest rates would go up and it looks like there would be some uptick in the interest rate both because of the external pressure and the fact that the foreign inflows that were expected have not been as strong as they were envisaged to be. So I would say that this year I see interest rates going up, exchange rate ending up somewhere between Rs 45.5 to Rs 46.0, the fiscal deficit widening because when interest rates go up the cost of borrowings to the government also goes up. And inflation will certainly be at a much higher level than last year. Some part of the oil price hike that has been absorbed by the oil pool would be ultimately passed on and this would also increase the inflation.

    EQM: So for commodity industries overall, no respite from pain...

    Mr. Ravimohan: What has happened is that the margins have been squeezed and there is overcapacity in most of the industries not just in metals and oil. Across the commodity industries we find that the capacities are still very high for the current level of consumption. So the pressure on margins will be there for at least the next one or two years. And investment is also not picking up as a result of this.

    So, at the economy level the investment led growth that we were witnessing in the past will not happen now. And that slack has to picked up by the services sector and by the consumption led growth. For the latter, this inflation is not very good. So if the consumption led growth does not come, the entire burden comes on the services, which are still showing a lot of promise but whether that will be adequate to overcome the slack in the investment led growth is difficult to say. More importantly, agriculture is still moribund. So we have become extremely concentrated and vulnerable to what services will do.

    Services, be they telecom, banking and software are showing promise and they certainly have a lot more to deliver. But the thrust has come from the export market (for the software industry) and there competition is catching up. We've also (because of our success) gone up the cost chain and there are other emerging countries that are beginning to compete. So on a sustained basis over the next two years how well we maintain this growth rate will be crucial and the challenge really is that the services sector, which is growing is still very small compared to problem that we have. So whether they would be able to catch up and solve the problem remains to be seen.

    EQM: You've spoken in the past about ratio of rating upgrades/downgrades ratio being a lead indicator of economic growth. Could you elaborate on that concept?

    Mr. Ravimohan: This was based on what we've witnessed over the past four years. After the liberalisation and deregulation in 1991 we witnessed a huge upsurge in economic activity and investment activity. And all the indicators, including our rating activity, were absolutely on the upswing. I remember over three years from 1993-94 to 1995-96 the number of rating upgrades (including the no changes) we did, amounted to 90% of the total ratings i.e. around 60% were upgrades and 35% were no rating change and may be 1-2% were rating downgrades. In 1995-96 after seeing a sustained uptrend we became bullish. In 1996-97 our rating upgrade/downgrade ratio started dropping. It became somewhere around 50:50. We were surprised by three things at that time.

    First, by the huge amount of capacity that was being added. Till 1995-96 even we didn't get a full appreciation of the capacity being added whether in steel, cement etc. A lot of announcements were made but even we were sceptical whether all of those would be followed through but by the end of 1995-96 we were surprised that all those were being constructed on the ground. Then we were clear that industry would not be able to absorb all those capacities. What was unnerving at that point was till the end of the eighties we were adding capacities in discrete proportions say 10,000 tonnes but by the mid nineties capacity additions were of the order of 5 m tonnes. So, that actually put a brake on our enthusiasm with the industry. At that time we were more worried about the tightness in the market and we started making rating changes to reflect that. I clearly remember IPCL was one of those cases where we had to bring down the rating change and they were saying in this huge upturn why are you downgrading us, but we could see the capacity build up and the tightness in the market and margins becoming an issue.

    The next year we actually saw the IIP fall purely as a result of the tightness in the market and as the IIP fell, the GDP also fell and the market's honeymoon for giving funds to anyone who wanted to set up anything ended. We saw debt equities go out of bounds. That year was the first year when a huge amount of downgrades (almost 75% of our rating actions) compared to upgrades took place. The next year was a total wash out with almost 99% downgrades and hardly one or two companies were upgraded. And what was interesting was that while at that time each one of these companies were individually reviewed, when we put all that together there was a strong correlation that emerged between the ratio of rating upgrade/downgrade and indicators such as the GDP and the IIP growth rate and amount of equity money raised from the IPO market. The latter is also an important indicator for us since debt equities balance must be maintained. Ratios such as debt equity and interest cover play an important role in our understanding of how comfortable the company's coverage is for repayment of debt. And as we saw debt equities shooting up the rating downgrades were significantly higher.

    Last year we saw somewhat of a steady state being achieved where the downgrades still predominated but it was not as widespread as the year before last. And that was a surprise us in the light of the complete lack of revival of the equity market. This year (i.e. calendar year 2000) we have seen somewhat of an uptick in the upgrades more predicated by the fact that some of the stronger companies came out as great winners or consolidated and deleveraging their risks. One company that comes to mind is Mahindra & Mahindra. They reduced their debt equity, they got rid of their car project, they improved productivity norms, forex loans were repaid. This is just one example. There are a host of companies most of whom have been upgraded this year that have followed very strong derisking measures.

    Concerns still remain on three issues: margins are still low and we feel that they will continue to remain low in many industries for some time to come. Hence the abilities of the individual companies to compete in thin margins would be of paramount importance. We are still hoping for the revival of the equity markets and we felt that maybe the feel good factor would permeate to the other sectors as well. This has not happened, so far. A lot of these companies would be able to come out of this situation only when they infuse equity in their balance sheet and retire the high cost debt that they contracted during the 1994-96 regime. In retrospect, the interest rates hardened at a time when massive investment was taking place because of the credit squeeze that was imposed in order to rein in inflation. That looks like a major cause for the downgrades that have taken place because interest rates shot up and huge investments have taken place at those very high interest rates (since many companies were caught up in the middle of the expansion when the interest rates shot up). That needs to get out of the system if these companies are to survive. Hence they need equity funding. However, the markets don't seem to be any mood to give the required funding. So these companies will have to look out for partners. What has happened is that more than 45% of the rating that are outstanding today are still below investment grade. And for them to come back to the mainstream would require balance sheet restructuring. If it's not going to come from the equity market, they'll have to look atů some of them have sold property, they've sold divisions, they've begun to move in the right direction but it's going to be a long haul.

    EQM: If you look at this from another perspective, what happens to the equity market till these companies finally get back on the rails?

    Mr. Ravimohan: The equity market has got clearly bifurcated between two dimensions. One dimension is clearly what they have been talking about, the new and the old economy stocks. The other dimension pertains to the divide between good and bad companies. Those two divides seem to be very strongly etched. I have always respected the market so you have to take my comment as a pure observation rather than a criticism of the market. I have not been able to find empathy or the analytical backing for making such a strong distinction between what they call old and new economy stocks. Certainly, I can empathise, I can understand the sharp distinction between good and bad companies. It's been done logically also. But somehow I have not yet been able to convince myself that there is a completely different paradigm under which the new economy stocks operate. And that everything they do will be good and everything the so called old economy stocks do will be bad. I have a feeling that there has been some bit of correction and there has to be a lot more correction.

    I am quite willing to accept the market's judgment when you say that there are stocks between 0 P/E to 100, 150 P/E, even 250 P/E is fine with me provided there are continuous data points. If you say that there is something (some stocks) at 500 (P/E) some at 100, a few at 30 and the remaining all at 5 P/E, there is a no continuum. After all, the software industry has to sell software to (say) the petrochemical industry. If you saying that the latter is absolutely dead and gone, then they are not going to be able to buy software also. It may be a tenuous link but there is a link and you cannot disrupt that.

    Now (after the recent correction) we can start to talk a little more sanely about why this (software) is 150 P/E and this (old economy stocks) is 2 P/E. I still have a lot of issues on that and I feel that over the medium term that will also get corrected. I have no doubt that the software companies in this country will do very well, they have a lot of upside potential and they will grow tremendously. Clearly, keeping software companies at the highest level of valuations is something that I am very comfortable with. I have doubts on some companies' abilities to ramp up their output in tune with the market's requirements. They are growing continuously and strains will tell, managerial controls will weaken at some point in time and good managements would not like that to happen.

    They will themselves put a restraint on their growth and say 'Let me consolidate, I've grown fast enough, at the fringes I am not able to maintain quality, there are customer complaints.' Companies are already employing 8,000-9,000 people and if you expect them to grow 100%, next year they would have to add another 8,000 people. This is not a joke, it's a huge managerial challenge. Then next year they'd have to add another 16,000 people. That I'm worried about as to how companies will have to cope with that. To some extent they will get value appreciation. If today some of the leading Indian companies are getting $ 55/manhour, they may get $ 70 per hour, that will bring some growth, some amount of acquisitions will also be happening that will also bring growth. But I cannot see all this happening all the time to continuously feed the market expectation of 200% growth on a CAGR basis. If that doesn't come even these valuations are dicey. Because for these valuations to sustain you have to do three things. One you have to continuously acquire companies or continuously increase the value or continuously increase the throughput. All three are fraught with tension. To be able to do this all the time on the run would be superhuman. If some of them (software companies) succeed in doing that I would salute them. Already what they have achieved is amazing and cannot be easily replicated. So considering the pressure on the management to perform at these levels, I would be cautious.

    But on the other hand I very strongly feel that many of the so called old economy companies are doing well but are not being given their due. And have, in my opinion, a lot of upside potential. At some point in time investment managers would have to make a determination as to what the potential upside is on these two types of stocks.

    I feel that before the end of this year there would be a little more of rebalancing in values and somewhat of a more level headed continuum on valuations.

    Read the second part of the interview



    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on ""I strongly feel that the so called old economy companies are not being given their due..."". Click here!


    More Views on News

    HDFC: Red Flag in Developer Loans (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Aug 10, 2017

    HDFC starts FY18 on robust loan growth but asset quality slips on increased exposure to developer loans.

    Shriram Trans Fin: FY17 Ends on a Tepid Note due to Regulatory Headwinds (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Jun 22, 2017

    Demonetisation led slowdown coupled with shift to stringent bad loan norms keep Shriram Transport Finance on a slow wicket.

    Power Finance Corp: Alignment with RBI Norms Knocks Down FY17 Earnings (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Jun 14, 2017

    Power Finance Corporation earnings hit by RBI mandated higher provision on state government power generation projects where the recovery continues to be 100%.

    IDFC: Ends FY17 on a Healthy Note (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    May 30, 2017

    IDFC regains its tempo in FY17 post the demerger of the banking business.

    HDFC: Conservative Provisioning tempers down FY17 earnings (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    May 9, 2017

    HDFC ends FY17 on a tepid note as it remains conservative on the asset quality front.

    More Views on News

    Most Popular

    A 'Backdoor' to Multibaggers: It's Like Investing in Asian Paints Ten Years Ago(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.

    The Most Profitable Investment in the History of the World(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 8, 2017

    'Yes, it looks like a bubble. And, yes, it's like buying a lottery ticket. But there's something happening that has never happened before. It's an evolutionary leap in money itself.'

    Should You Invest In Bharat-22 ETF? Know Here...(Outside View)

    Aug 8, 2017

    Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...

    Signs of Life in the India VIX(Daily Profit Hunter)

    Aug 12, 2017

    The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.

    Bitcoin Continues Stellar Rise(Chart Of The Day)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Bitcoin hits an all-time high, is there more upside left?

    Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
    Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement.

    LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.

    SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.

    Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
    Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: info@equitymaster.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407

    Become A Smarter Investor In
    Just 5 Minutes

    Multibagger Stocks Guide 2017
    Get our special report, Multibagger Stocks Guide (2017 Edition) Now!
    We will never sell or rent your email id.
    Please read our Terms


    Aug 21, 2017 03:37 PM



    Detailed Quarterly Results With Charts