Jun 21, 2011|
The curious case of Wockhardt - II
In the previous article, 'the curious case of Wockhardt', we discussed the problems that led to the fall of Wockhardt. Moving ahead we discuss the events that helped the company to deal with its problems.
Wockhardt in a mess
Given the precarious debt position that it was in, in April 2009, Wockhardt approached the domestic lenders for corporate debt restructuring (CDR) led by ICICI Bank. In a couple of months, the lenders proposed to restructure existing loans. The lenders included domestic lenders, FCCB (foreign currency convertible bonds) holders, and other foreign lenders. FCCBs are special type of foreign loans that can later be converted to shares at a predetermined price. Most of the secured loans were given by domestic lenders. The plan was to sell some of its assets and raise Rs 7.9 bn and repayment to secured lenders to be done by 2015. The promoters also agreed to get Rs 700 m as fresh equity. In August 2009, promoters sold their personal stake in the hospital chain to Fortis for Rs 9 bn (this business also required more capital which the promoters did not have). In the same year, as per the plan it also sold two companies and gathered Rs 6.8 bn.
As per the CDR, the FCCB holders had an option to convert into shares or redeem the bonds. If they chose redemption, it would have been done at a discount of 65%. This meant a capital loss of 65% for an FCCB holder. To avoid it, one of the large state owned banks went ahead with the conversion of FCCBs into preferential shares. But the terms were not favorable to other FCCB holders. In early 2010, they approached the court and filed a winding up petition against Wockhardt.
On the other side, unsecured lenders included a couple of foreign banks who sold structured products to the company. They also approached the court opposing the CDR scheme as they believed that it was only favoring the Indian banks.
Getting out of the mess
In Feb 2009, the stock price of Wockhardt made a low of Rs 70 and was down 80% in a year. The price later recovered to Rs 150 when the sale of its nutritional business to Abbott was finalized in July 2009. The deal was valued at Rs 6.25 bn. But it hit a wall in early 2010 as Wockhardt was unable to solve its debt restructuring issues with some of its lenders. And the deal was called off mutually by Abbott and Wockhardt.
The court battle for 'winding up' went nowhere and the FCCB lenders and foreign creditors were left frustrated. In August, the company finally negotiated the restructuring of FCCB loans with the hedge fund QVT. As QVT held majority of the FCCBs (US$ 42 m) out of the total US$ 74 m remaining, the same terms were enforced on the other lenders too. As part of the settlement, QVT also decided to withdraw the 'winding up' petition filed against the company in the court.
However, unexpectedly, the blow came from the remaining FCCB holders - Sun Pharma and Syndicate Bank. The same terms were not acceptable to them. For this reason, they challenged the 'withdrawal of winding up petition' on Wockhardt. The court proceedings are going on till date. But after the settlement with QVT who holds most of the FCCBs, the stock price recovered further from the Rs 150 mark to around Rs 380 levels.
What lies ahead?
The scenario for Wockhardt has surely improved. Wockhardt has restructured most of its debt as part of the CDR. The court has granted the company temporary relief from 'winding up'. As far as the business is concerned, the US and Indian businesses have been doing well. FY11 results showed drastic improvement in the operating margins.
However, the debt as on March 2010 stood at Rs 40 bn (secured loans of approx. Rs 35 bn and unsecured FCCBs of approx. Rs 5 bn). The repayment will start from 2013. Besides this, legal hassles are not entirely over for the company either at least on the redemption of FCCBs front. Plus, the company's efforts to sell businesses to raise cash have not all yielded the desired results. All this makes the future extremely uncertain for the company. Indeed, Wockhardt is an example of what can happen to a company having a dubious management at the helm of affairs. If the court does rule in favor of Wockhardt and if it does manage to sell a part of its non-essential businesses, probably the company will see better days. Till then, a cloud still hangs over the business.
More Views on News
Aug 14, 2017
A challenging environment and one-time expense pushes Sun Pharma into a loss in the first quarter.
Aug 14, 2017
GST impact coupled with price erosion in US leads to lower profits for the quarter.
Aug 8, 2017
Profits plunge due to higher raw material costs.
Jun 16, 2017
Here's what you can expect from The 5 Minute Wrapup in the coming months and years.
Jun 23, 2017
Net Profit lower due to exceptional items in the previous year.
More Views on News
Aug 7, 2017
The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.
Aug 10, 2017
Don't miss these proxy bets on growing companies or in a few years you will be looking back with regret.
Aug 8, 2017
Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...
Aug 12, 2017
The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.
Aug 7, 2017
Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: email@example.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407