Jul 5, 2004|
Energy stocks: A peek at the valuations
The announcement of a price hike in case of petrol, diesel and LPG along with cuts in excise duties has resulted in a spurt in oil stock prices. At the same time, one is compelled to look at the valuations to arrive a conclusion. We have thus chosen two integrated oil companies (refining and marketing) and one refining company and shall try to put things in perspective as to why they deserve the valuations at which they trade.
From the above table, it might look though that Kochi Refineries is cheaper as compared to the other two majors. However, one has to look at the business model. BPCL and HPCL are integrated oil marketing companies with refining capacities, while Kochi Refineries is a stand-alone refinery and does not, so far, have its own retail network. Lets' have a look at the individual companies to have a clear understanding of their businesses:
BPCL: BPCL is an integrated oil marketing company with its own refining capacity of 8.7 MMTPA (million metric tonnes per annum) and nearly 4,500 retail outlets. The company's business model is reasonably diversified as it has entered into the LNG business, which is likely to witness growth with new gas-based power capacities being added.
HPCL: The second largest oil marketing company has a refining capacity of nearly 13 MMTPA. It has nearly 5,100 retail outlets thereby giving the company flexibility to reach out through the length and breadth of the country. The refining margins adhere to international standards and therefore provide a cushion to the overall profitability of the company.
Kochi refineries: Kochi Refineries is a stand-alone refinery with a rated capacity of 7.5 MMTPA catering to the product needs of its parent BPCL in the southern markets. The company is now planning to venture into retail marketing of fuels so as to reduce its dependence on BPCL and diversify its revenue sources.
So, which stock would you like to be invested in?
The below mentioned table gives an indication with our views on the advantages/disadvantages of integrated companies and standalone refineries:
||Government controlled, quasi-deregulation
||Deregulated and conforms to international prices
||Own marketing network. So, better bargaining power as compared to standalone refineries
||Since no marketing network, at the mercy of marketing companies.
|Relative control on margins
||In a better position, as demand is relatively inelastic and pricing cartel among PSUs
||Government policies such as duty cuts and international prices softening can result in erosion of margins
||Expanding capacity and therefore, reducing dependence on standalone refineries
||Have to venture into marketing to diversify revenue base.
||Unlikely to be hit in the medium-term, as PSUs have created significant entry barrier. Long-term threats high.
||Controlled, as most of the stand-alone refineries are subsidiaries of the oil marketing PSUs and sell products to the parent.
From the above table, we believe it is a better option to stay invested in an integrated business model having better control over production and marketing of products as compared to a standalone refinery. The country is witnessing rapid expansion in refining capacity, and is likely to limit pricing power of standalone refineries in the future. The instance of Reliance Industries fits the above argument. Since the oil marketing companies are expanding capacities, offtake from Reliance has been lowered and as a result, Reliance Industries has offered nearly 33% discount of import parity differential on product prices. This signifies the fact that standalone refineries have little bargaining power against the marketing majors.
As the sector is de-controlled, like any global market, integrated players would be better placed to capitalize on the growth opportunity. Of course, integration is not only at the downstream level (i.e. marketing) but also at the upstream level (exploration). Until the players are given a free hand, the equation is not so favorably skewed towards integrated players.
More Views on News
Mar 27, 2017
GAIL (India) Ltd has announced results for the quarter ended December 2016. reported 9.4% year on year (YoY) decline in sales, while bottom-line grew 45.4% YoY.
Mar 17, 2017
ONGC has announced results for the quarter ended December 2016. The company has reported 9.2 % year on year (YoY) growth in sales, while bottom-line grew 197% YoY.
Jan 24, 2017
Oil India Limited announced results for the quarter ended September 2016. The company has reported an 6.5% and 7.8% Year on Year (YoY) decline in sales and net profit respectively during the quarter.
Dec 3, 2016
GAIL (India) Ltd has announced results for the quarter ended September 2016. The company has reported 16 % year on year (YoY) decline in sales, while bottom-line grew 180% YoY.
Nov 3, 2016
ONGC has announced results for the quarter ended September 2016. The company has reported 10.3 % year on year (YoY) decline in sales, while bottom-line grew 6.3% YoY.
More Views on News
Aug 7, 2017
The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.
Aug 4, 2017
The small-cap space is full of small players that are clear proxies to great growth stories and Indian megatrends.
Aug 8, 2017
Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...
Aug 12, 2017
The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.
Aug 7, 2017
Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407