X

Sign up for Equitymaster's free daily newsletter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get access to our latest Multibagger guide (2017 Edition) on picking money-making stocks.

This is an entirely free service. No payments are to be made.


Download Now Subscribe to our free daily e-letter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get this complimentary report.
We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
NPA: Hole in the pocket - Views on News from Equitymaster
 
 
  • PRINT
  • E-MAIL
  • FEEDBACK
  • A  A  A
  • Jul 7, 2001

    NPA: Hole in the pocket

    Indian banks (particularly nationalised banks) are struggling to come out of the 'net' of non-performing assets. The rising level of non-performing assets (NPAs) amounting to about Rs 600 bn has plagued the Indian banking system. Thus urgent cleaning up of bank balance sheet has become a crucial issue.

    Banks are in the risk business. In the process of providing financial services, they assume various kinds of risks viz. credit risk, market risk, operational risk, interest risk, forex risk and country risk. Among these different types of risks, credit constitutes the most dominant asset in the balance sheet, accounting for about 60% of total assets. The credit risk is generally made up of transaction risk (default risk) and portfolio risk. The risk management is a complex function and requires specialized skills and expertise. As a result managing credit risk efficiently assumes greater significance.

    What is called an NPA?
    It is those assets for which interest is overdue for more than 180 days. In simple words, an asset (or a credit facility) becomes non-performing when it ceases to yield income. As a result, banks do not recognize interest income on these assets unless it is actually received. If interest amount is already credited on an accrual basis in the past years, it should be reversed in the current year's account if such interest is still remaining uncollected.

    Once an asset falls under the NPA category, banks are required by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to make provision for the uncollected interest on these assets. For the purpose they have to classify their assets based on the strength and on collateral securities into:

    • Standard assets: This is not a non-performing asset. It does not carry more than normal risk attached to the business.

    • Substandard assets: It is an asset, which has been classified as non-performing for a period of less than two years. In this case the current networth of the borrower or the current market value of the security is not enough to ensure recovery of the debt due to the bank. The classification of substandard assets should not be upgraded (to standard assets) merely as a result of rescheduling of the payments. (Rescheduling indicates change in payment schedule by the borrower or by the banker) There must be a satisfactory performance for two years after such rescheduling.

    • Doubtful assets: It is an asset, which has remained non-performing for a period exceeding two years.

    • Loss assets: It is an asset identified by the bank, auditors or by the RBI inspection as a loss asset. It is an asset for which no security is available or there is considerable erosion in the realizable value of the security. (If the realizable value of the security as assessed by bank, approved valuers or RBI is less than 10% of the outstanding, it is known as considerable erosion in the value of asset.) As a result even though there may be some salvage or recovery value, its continuance as bankable asset is not warranted.

    After classifying assets into above categories, banks are required to make provision against these assets for the interest not collected by them. In terms of exact prudential regulations, the provisioning norms are as under:

    Asset Classification Provision requirements
    Standard assets 0.25%
    Substandard assets 10%
    Doubtful assets 20% - 50% of the secured portion depending on the
    age of NPA, and 100% of the unsecured portion.
    Loss assets It may be either written off or fully provided by the bank.

    The increasing levels of bad quality loans marred the prospects of nationalised banks in the past few years. As a result banks shifted their focus from the industrial segment to the corporate lending. This has curtailed the incremental NPAs to a certain extent. In FY01, gross NPAs of public sector banks (PSBs) increased by 3% compared to 9% jump in NPA levels of new private sector banks. The RBI has tightened the prudential norms regarding classifying assets as non-performing in line with the international standards. Accordingly, with effect from FY04, an asset will be classified as NPA if the interest is overdue for 90 days (instead of 180 days currently). These norms are likely to strengthen the balance sheet of banks, notwithstanding the fact that in the near term the higher provisions could trim the profit growth.

    The norms are tightened even for financial institutions (FIs). They are worst affected by the NPA wave thanks to lending to the commodity and economy sensitive sectors, not to mention that loans to steel, chemicals and textile sector played a key role in dragging down performance of FIs. So far they have been enjoying the privilege of recognizing a loan as NPA only if principal is overdue for more than 365 days and interest is outstanding for over 180 days. With a view to bring greater transparency, the RBI has proposed to reduce the time limit to 180 days (for principal). On the one hand imposition of stricter norms could lead to a difficult time for FIs, permitting them an option of restructuring their loans could give them some leeway.

    PSB's betting on restructuring
    Gross NPAs (Rs bn) FY00 FY01 Change
    Public sector banks 517 533 3.1%
    Old private banks 38 40 5.3%
    New private banks 9 9 8.6%
    Foreign banks 24 26 10.9%
    Financial institutions 143 157 9.7%
    Total 731 766 4.8%

    To facilitate the speedy recovery of NPAs, the RBI came up with the idea of a one-time settlement scheme for outstanding loans in FY01. PSB's have recovered about Rs 8 bn from 200,000 accounts in the last fiscal. Although, the scheme was extended till June 30, 2001, the response was not very encouraging, partly due to the legal impediments. However, the scheme actually gave the bankers an opportunity to make contact with borrowers, which were earlier in touch with only legal advisors or accountants. Empowering banks to enforce their charge without intervention of court could result in expeditious recovery of bad debts in future.

    Apart from this scheme, the government has designed major policy reforms in order to enhance the efficiency of the banking system. It has decided to set up 7 more debt recovery tribunals (DRTs) in addition to the existing 22 and 5 appellate tribunals. It has also proposed to bring in legislation for facilitating foreclosure and enforcement of securities in case of default. Repealment of SICA (Sick Industrial Companies Act) was another major step. The RBI has already asked banks to file criminal cases against borrowers who are willful defaulters. These initiatives are expected to aid banks to quickly recover their dues from the borrowers.

    NPA analysis
    (Rs m) Gross NPAs Gross NPAs as a %
    of total loans
    Net NPAs as a % of
    total loans
    Provision coverage*
    Private sector banks
    ICICI Bank 4,210 6.0% 2.2% 63.4%
    HDFC Bank 1,468 3.2% 0.4% 85.9%
    UTI Bank 2,258 4.7% 3.8% 19.7%
    IDBI Bank 1,500 4.8% 3.1% 36.0%
    Public sector banks
    SBI 158,750 14.0% 6.0% 56.9%
    Corp. Bank 4,847 5.6% 2.0% 64.7%
    BOB 41,860 15.3% 6.8% 55.8%
    FIs
    ICICI 59,880 9.9% 4.9% 50.2%
    HDFC 3,001 2.3% 0.9% 62.4%
    * % of cumulative provisions made on Gross NPAs

    Although ratio of net NPAs to net advances have been declining in the past two years, it hardly offers any comfort. This is due to the fact that in absolute terms NPAs are still very high (Rs 766 bn). Therefore, it will be a challenge for banks to overcome this problem. For this, the internal control system and risk management system are required to be strengthened by banks. There should be a system for timely detection of NPAs. An important means for positioning appropriate risk management techniques is the MIS development, which requires building up of strong database and other information sets.

    The growing NPAs are a source of worry for the Finance Minister too. Looking at the changing scenario in the world markets, the problem becomes more ironical because Indian banking at this juncture cannot afford to remain unresponsive to the global requirements.

    However, the outlook for the current fiscal looks bleak. Industrial production has slowed down and the recent economic data point to a recession. Credit offtake is also lacklustre. It does seem, at this point, that NPA levels of banks would not come down significantly during the current year.

     

     

    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "NPA: Hole in the pocket". Click here!

    1 Responses to "NPA: Hole in the pocket"

    CSBN NAIR

    Jun 21, 2009

    The norm is not updated. I think it is now 90 days and in respect of a loan - an instalment has to be in default for over 90 days.

    Like 
      
    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "NPA: Hole in the pocket". Click here!
     

    More Views on News

    IDFC Bank: Strong Trading Income Shields Credit Slowdown (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Aug 10, 2017

    IDFC Bank is taking steps to address contracting NIMs and successfully transition in to a retail bank.

    ICICI Bank: Loan Slippages Trending Downwards (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Aug 10, 2017

    Asset quality will be the key thing to watch out for going forward.

    Axis Bank: Outside Watchlist Slippages a Big Worry (Quarterly Results Update - Detailed)

    Jul 31, 2017

    Almost 74% of the watchlist as provided by the bank of Rs 226 billion in FY16 has turned into non-performing assets.

    Should You Take SBI Chief's Advice and Load up on SBI Shares? (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Jul 6, 2017

    Does the stock score on the value versus price equation?

    AU Small Finance Bank Ltd. (IPO)

    Jun 27, 2017

    Should one subscribe to the IPO of AU Small Finance Bank Ltd?

    More Views on News

    Most Popular

    Demonetisation Barely Made Any Difference to Tax Collections(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 7, 2017

    The data tells us quite a different story from the one the government is trying to project.

    Proxy Plays: A Smart Way to Bet on 'Off Limits' Companies(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 4, 2017

    The small-cap space is full of small players that are clear proxies to great growth stories and Indian megatrends.

    Should You Invest In Bharat-22 ETF? Know Here...(Outside View)

    Aug 8, 2017

    Bharat-22 is one of the most diverse ETFs offered so far by the Government. Know here if you should invest...

    Signs of Life in the India VIX(Daily Profit Hunter)

    Aug 12, 2017

    The India VIX is up 36% in the last week. Fear has gone up but is still low by historical standards.

    7 Financial Gifts For Your Sister This Raksha Bandhan(Outside View)

    Aug 7, 2017

    Raksha Bandhan signifies the brother-sister bond. Here are 7 thoughtful financial gifts for sisters...

    More
    Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
    Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement.

    LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.

    SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.

    Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
    Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: info@equitymaster.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407
     

    Become A Smarter Investor In
    Just 5 Minutes

    Multibagger Stocks Guide 2017
    Get our special report, Multibagger Stocks Guide (2017 Edition) Now!
    We will never sell or rent your email id.
    Please read our Terms

    S&P BSE BANKEX


    Aug 17, 2017 (Close)

    COMPARE COMPANY

    MARKET STATS